BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 18clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi758Mumbai752Karnataka545Chennai394Bangalore372Pune240Jaipur216Ahmedabad204Kolkata142Hyderabad138Chandigarh110Lucknow70Indore64Cochin59Amritsar56Cuttack50Visakhapatnam44Nagpur37Rajkot37Allahabad32Raipur32Surat29Agra26Telangana22Calcutta18Patna15SC14Jodhpur14Panaji14Varanasi10Ranchi9Kerala9Rajasthan7Punjab & Haryana6Jabalpur3Dehradun2Himachal Pradesh2Andhra Pradesh2Guwahati2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 12A16Section 801B8Section 118Exemption6Section 143(1)(a)4Section 139(1)4Addition to Income4Section 2(15)3Section 103

ACIT vs. M/S XAVIER INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SERVICE,

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 100/RAN/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi30 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year: 2009-2010

For Appellant: Shri B.K.Banka, CAFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Sutariaya, CIT (DR)
Section 10Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 35A

trust has to be deducted to arrive at the income available for application to charitable and religious purposes. The CIT(A) observed that the books of accounts of assessee were duly audited and assessee is running educational institution and had spent money under the head of maintenance of buildings and other assets to the tune of Rs.1

Condonation of Delay3
Charitable Trust3
Section 139(4)2

M/S CHURCH SCHOOL,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT, JAMSHEPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee being ITA No

ITA 103/RAN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi16 May 2018AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Anshul Ringasia, Advocate, ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Mondal, JCIT, ld.Sr.DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 234B

section 10(23)( c )(vi) of the IT Act and has held that mere surplus does not mean that institution is existing for M/s. Church School making profit. The predominant object test must be applied. Hon’ble Apex Court while affirming the decision of Punjab and Haryana High court in case of Pine Grove international charitable trust v/s Union

ACIT.CIRCLE-1 ,, RANCHI vs. MOHINI DEVI CHARITABLE TRUST, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 360/RAN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi18 Oct 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 11(1)Section 12A

18, 2023 O R D E R Per Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President (KZ):- The present appeal is directed at the instance of Revenue against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income 1 Assessment Year: 2013-2014 Mohini Devi Charitable Trust Tax (Appeals)-3, Patna dated 17th September, 2018 passed for A.Y. 2013-14. 2. Though the Revenue has taken four

INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. DUKHHARAN MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 261/RAN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi14 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.261/Ran/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Ito, Exemption Ward, Ranchi ….…………….……...................……….……Appellant Vs. Dudhharan Memorial Charitable Trust.…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Rani Hospital Behind Machlighar Booty Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand – 834001. [Pan: Aactd1772A] Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Md. Shadab Ahmed, Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 18, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 14, 2026 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Nfac, Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)”) Dated 20.03.2024 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”).

Section 11Section 13(1)(c)Section 250

Charitable Trust.…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Rani Hospital Behind Machlighar Booty Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand – 834001. [PAN: AACTD1772A] Appearances by: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., appeared on behalf of the appellant. Md. Shadab Ahmed, DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : December 18, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order : January 14, 2026 ORDER Per Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member: This appeal

SHREE DIGAMBER JAIN BHAWAN,RANCHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTIO), PATNA

In the result, we find that there is no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court of Delhi

ITA 28/RAN/2019[0]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi16 Sept 2020

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Godara)

Section 12A

charitable in nature and whether the activities which the Trust proposed to carry on are genuine in the sense that they are in line with the objects of the Trust. In contrast, the position would be different where the Commissioner proposes to cancel the registration of a Trust under sub-section (3) of section 12AA of the Act. There

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 5/RAN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)(a)Section 801Section 801B

18. That the assessee was prevented by a reasonable cause as attributed by it in furnishing its return of income belatedly. 19. That it is clear that the provision contained in s. 80AC as regards the time limit for filing the return of income is directory but not mandatory in view of the aforesaid provisions of the Act permitting relaxation

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 4/RAN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)(a)Section 801Section 801B

18. That the assessee was prevented by a reasonable cause as attributed by it in furnishing its return of income belatedly. 19. That it is clear that the provision contained in s. 80AC as regards the time limit for filing the return of income is directory but not mandatory in view of the aforesaid provisions of the Act permitting relaxation

ITO EXEMPTION WARD , JAMSHEDPUR vs. ALL INDIA WOMEN'S CONFERENCE , JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assesse are allowed

ITA 230/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Nov 2018

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A.K.Mohanty, JCIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 215Section 271(1)(c)

section 2(15) of the Act. 17. In the above background of the case, we find that it is not dispute that that assessee trust is giving employment to widow, destitute and helpless \women. Instead of giving them donation, the assessee is providing employment to these needy women and paying them wages for the work done. This enhances the prestige

JAMSHEDPUR MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, PATNA, PATNA

In the result, grounds of appeals raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 157/RAN/2023[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 May 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Jamshedpur Management Association, C.I.T.(Exemption), 18, Centre For Excellence, Ch Area Patna Vs. (East), Jamshedpur-831001 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaeaj 2108 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)

18, Centre For Excellence, CH Area Patna Vs. (East), Jamshedpur-831001 (Jharkhand) PAN No. AAEAJ 2108 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Assessee represented by Shri R.R. Mittal, A.R. Department represented by Md. A.H. Chowdhury, CIT-DR Date of hearing 06/05/2025 Date of pronouncement 06/05/2025 O R D E R PER: BENCH 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against