Search: charitable trust

9 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 142(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 12A32 Section 1111 Section 801B8 Exemption7 Section 143(1)(a)4 Section 139(1)4 Deduction4 Section 173 Section 13(1)3 Section 133(6)3 Charitable Trust3 Condonation of Delay2

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 5/RAN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)(a)Section 801Section 801B

Charitable and Chaleshwar Temple Trust Vs CIT (207 ITR 368) (Bom)(HC) has held as under:- Surya Realcon P Ltd. Vs DCIT On a careful reading of section 139 of the Act, we are of the clear opinion that sub-sections (1) and (4) of section 139 have to be read together and on such a reading, the inevitable conclusion

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 4/RAN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)(a)Section 801Section 801B

SARVODAYA WELFARE SOCIETY,RANCHI vs. CIT EXEMPTION , PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 237/RAN/2017[17-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi26 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : Na Sarvodya Welfare Society, Vs Cit(E), Patna Bethany Convent Compound, Kadru Road, Near Kadru Over Bridger, P.Odoranda, Dist-Ranchi- 834002 Pan/Gir No. : Aanas 3371 A .. Respondent (Appellant) Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Ar Revenue By : Shri Inderjit Singh, Cit(Sr.Dr) Date Of Hearing : 22.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.11.2018

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Inderjit Singh, CIT(Sr.DR)

Section 12A

142 (Madras) has held as under:- “It is not denied by the assessee that on the date of the application under section 12AA, it was yet to commence its operation. But nevertheless the genuineness of the objects of the trust were not questioned by the Commissioner. Considering the fact that the continuance of registration is further a subject matter

M/S NAI PAHAL FOUNDATION,RANCHI vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 268/RAN/2016[]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi26 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : Na M/S Nai Pahal Foundation, Vs Cit(E), Patna 13P, Srs Park Phase-1, Tatisilway Industrial Area Khelgaon Road, Ranchi-845103 Pan No. : Aacan 4248 A .. Respondent (Appellant) Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Ar Revenue By : Shri A.K.Mohanty, Jcit(Jr.Dr) Date Of Hearing : 26.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.11.2018 O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(E)

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, ARFor Respondent: Shri A.K.Mohanty, JCIT(Jr.DR)

Section 11Section 12A

AAKANKSHA UTPRERAK SAMAJIK SANSTHA,DHANBAD vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6/RAN/2017[]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi28 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : Na Aakanksha Utprerak Vs Cit(E), Patna Samajik Sanstha, Nawagarh More, Po-Kharkharee, Dhanbad-828125 Pan No. : Aacaa 2234 K .. Respondent (Appellant) Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Ar Revenue By : Shri Inderjit Singh, Cit(Sr.Dr) Date Of Hearing : 26.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.11.2018 O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(E)

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Inderjit Singh, CIT(Sr.DR)

Section 11Section 12A

142 (Madras) has held as under:- 7 “It is not denied by the assessee that on the date of the application under section 12AA, it was yet to commence its operation. But nevertheless the genuineness of the objects of the trust were not questioned by the Commissioner. Considering the fact that the continuance of registration is further a subject matter

HOLYFAITH TRIBAL W AND D TRUST ,RANCHI vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 69/RAN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust, Ranchi, Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust, Ranchi, I.T.O., 406, Midland East Apartment, 406, Midland East Apartment, Exemption Ward, Exemption Ward, Vs. Anantpur, Chutia, Doranda, Anantpur, Chutia, Doranda, Ranchi. Ranchi-834002 (Jharkhand) 834002 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaath 5200 R Aaath 5200 R Appellant/ Assessee Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Respondent/ Revenue

Section 11Section 13(1)Section 133(6)Section 17

Section 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued, in response to which the Secretary of the Trust appeared and produced the documents required for verification of the P a g e 3 | 7 Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust Vs ITO(E) application of income for charitable

INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. DUKHHARAN MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 261/RAN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi14 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.261/Ran/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Ito, Exemption Ward, Ranchi ….…………….……...................……….……Appellant Vs. Dudhharan Memorial Charitable Trust.…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Rani Hospital Behind Machlighar Booty Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand – 834001. [Pan: Aactd1772A] Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Md. Shadab Ahmed, Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 18, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 14, 2026 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Nfac, Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)”) Dated 20.03.2024 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”).

Section 11Section 13(1)(c)Section 250

sections 143(2) and 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were issued. During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer observed that the assessee trust had paid substantial amounts to specified persons as remuneration namely ₹72,00,000 to Shri Rajesh Kumar, ₹24,00,000 to Dr. Soni Sinha, ₹7,20,000 to Shri Pawan Kumar, ₹1

M/S MANAVTA,JAMTARA vs. CIT EXPEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 146/RAN/2017[17-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi02 Dec 2019

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia& Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Inderjeet Singh, CIT (D.R.)

Section 12A

142 (Madras) has held as under:- "It is not denied by the assessee that on the date of the application under section 12AA, it was yet to commence its operation. But nevertheless the genuineness of the objects of the trust were not questioned by the Commissioner. Considering the fact that the continuance of registration is further a subject matter

PATEL SEVA SANGH,BOKARO STEEL CITY vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE), RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 486/RAN/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Jan 2026AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Patel Seva Sangh, I.T.O., C/O-Sardar Patel Public School, Sector- Exemption, Vs. 9, Bokaro-827009 (Jharkhand) Hazaribagh. Pan No. Aabtp 2202 N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 143(2)Section 144Section 44ASection 56

1 That The Learned Commissioner of Income Tax. (Appeals) has erred in confirming the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 144 of Income Tax Act 1961, falling to consider the peculiar facts and circumstances surrounding the assessment for the Assessment Year 2018-19, which was the first year of implementation of the Faceless Assessment Scheme and there