BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 14clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai946Delhi930Karnataka567Chennai488Bangalore458Ahmedabad289Jaipur252Pune248Kolkata173Hyderabad166Chandigarh107Cochin94Amritsar80Indore72Rajkot69Surat67Lucknow56Visakhapatnam48Cuttack46Allahabad33Raipur32Nagpur30Telangana30Agra27Patna24Jodhpur22Calcutta19SC14Kerala9Dehradun9Guwahati8Varanasi7Rajasthan7Punjab & Haryana6Ranchi6Panaji5Jabalpur4Andhra Pradesh2Himachal Pradesh2Orissa2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 12A13Section 801B8Section 143(1)(a)4Section 139(1)4Exemption4Section 139(4)2Section 1392Section 8012Section 13(1)(c)2

SHREE DIGAMBER JAIN BHAWAN,RANCHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTIO), PATNA

In the result, we find that there is no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court of Delhi

ITA 28/RAN/2019[0]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi16 Sept 2020

Bench: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Godara)

Section 12A

charitable in nature and whether the activities which the Trust proposed to carry on are genuine in the sense that they are in line with the objects of the Trust. In contrast, the position would be different where the Commissioner proposes to cancel the registration of a Trust under sub-section (3) of section 12AA of the Act. There

INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. DUKHHARAN MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 261/RAN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi14 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.261/Ran/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Ito, Exemption Ward, Ranchi ….…………….……...................……….……Appellant Vs. Dudhharan Memorial Charitable Trust.…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Rani Hospital Behind Machlighar Booty Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand – 834001. [Pan: Aactd1772A] Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Md. Shadab Ahmed, Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 18, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 14, 2026 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Nfac, Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)”) Dated 20.03.2024 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”).

Deduction2
Condonation of Delay2
Bench:
Section 11Section 13(1)(c)Section 250

Charitable Trust.…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Rani Hospital Behind Machlighar Booty Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand – 834001. [PAN: AACTD1772A] Appearances by: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., appeared on behalf of the appellant. Md. Shadab Ahmed, DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : December 18, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order : January 14, 2026 ORDER Per Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member: This appeal

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 5/RAN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)(a)Section 801Section 801B

14. That for claiming deduction U/s 80113, furnishing of return on or before due date u/s 139(1) is directory and not mandatory and, therefore, relief shall be granted by the appellate authority in case, there was genuine and valid reason for the delay in filing of return. 15. That there was genuine and valid reason for the delay

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 4/RAN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)(a)Section 801Section 801B

14. That for claiming deduction U/s 80113, furnishing of return on or before due date u/s 139(1) is directory and not mandatory and, therefore, relief shall be granted by the appellate authority in case, there was genuine and valid reason for the delay in filing of return. 15. That there was genuine and valid reason for the delay

ULGULAN FOUNDATION,RANCHI vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PATNA

Appeals are allowed

ITA 223/RAN/2018[0]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi14 Jul 2020

Bench: Shri S.S, Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am बनाम M/S Binod Vichar Manch Cit(Exemption), Patna / C/O Haldhar Mahto, Bagdaha, V/S. Rajganj, Dhanbad-828113. [Pan No.Aadtb0125E] अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent .. बनाम Ulgulan Foundation Cit(Exemption), Patna / C/O Ajay Kumar Patni, Block V/S. Road, Bundu, Ranchi-835204. [Pan No.Aaatu7514M] अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent ..

Section 12A

14-07-2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement -07-2020 आदेश /O R D E R Per Bench(Oral): These two assessees’ separate appeals arise against the Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption), Patna’s separate orders dated 19.02.2018 & 15.03.2018 involving proceedings u/s 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’); respectively. Heard

M/S BINOD VICHAR MANCH,DHANBAD vs. CIT (EXEMPTION),, PATNA

Appeals are allowed

ITA 264/RAN/2018[0]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi14 Jul 2020

Bench: Shri S.S, Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am बनाम M/S Binod Vichar Manch Cit(Exemption), Patna / C/O Haldhar Mahto, Bagdaha, V/S. Rajganj, Dhanbad-828113. [Pan No.Aadtb0125E] अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent .. बनाम Ulgulan Foundation Cit(Exemption), Patna / C/O Ajay Kumar Patni, Block V/S. Road, Bundu, Ranchi-835204. [Pan No.Aaatu7514M] अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent ..

Section 12A

14-07-2020 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement -07-2020 आदेश /O R D E R Per Bench(Oral): These two assessees’ separate appeals arise against the Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption), Patna’s separate orders dated 19.02.2018 & 15.03.2018 involving proceedings u/s 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’); respectively. Heard