AAKANKSHA UTPRERAK SAMAJIK SANSTHA,DHANBAD vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : Na Aakanksha Utprerak Vs Cit(E), Patna Samajik Sanstha, Nawagarh More, Po-Kharkharee, Dhanbad-828125 Pan No. : Aacaa 2234 K .. Respondent (Appellant) Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Ar Revenue By : Shri Inderjit Singh, Cit(Sr.Dr) Date Of Hearing : 26.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.11.2018 O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(E)

charitable and religious purposes, receiving contribution, shall not be an income in terms of Section 11 of the Act. The benefit of Sections 11 and 12 of the Act, are available only if such Trust or Institution is registered under Section 12AA of the Act. 10. On the other hand, Section 10(23C) of the Act are the provisions

ACIT vs. M/S XAVIER INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SERVICE,

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year: 2009-2010

Section 12AA of the Act was withdrawn by the department. In the above circumstances, we do not find any good reason to interfere with the order of the CIT(A), which is hereby confirmed and ground of appeal of the revenue is dismissed. 6 IT A No.1 00/R an/2 014 Asse ssmen t Year: 2 009 -20 10 11. Ground

S S CHARITABLE TRUST,DUMKA vs. CIT APPEAL, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee-trust stands allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.49/Ran/2022 Assessment Year: 2016-17 S S Charitable Trust..….…..…………..…...…......................……...…..….. Appellant S S Vidya Vihar School, New Kumar Para, Near Dudhani Rasikpur, Asharam Road, Jharkhand-814110. [Pan: Aafts1387R] Vs. Ito, Exemption Ward, Ranchi…………………….……….…………….. Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 02, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 28, 2023 Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee-Trust Against The Order Dated 30.03.2022 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

6. We have considered the rival contentions. Since the assessment year 2016-17 was the first year for which Form 10 was to be e-filed and since the assessee-trust was having reasonable belief that the assessee-trust has applied 85% of its income for charitable purposes and, therefore, the assessee-trust was not required to file Form

HOLYFAITH TRIBAL W AND D TRUST ,RANCHI vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes only

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust, Ranchi, Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust, Ranchi, I.T.O., 406, Midland East Apartment, 406, Midland East Apartment, Exemption Ward, Exemption Ward, Vs. Anantpur, Chutia, Doranda, Anantpur, Chutia, Doranda, Ranchi. Ranchi-834002 (Jharkhand) 834002 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaath 5200 R Aaath 5200 R Appellant/ Assessee Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Respondent/ Revenue

6) were not issued rightly and as such, could P a g e 1 | 7 Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust Vs ITO(E) not be complied with. In any view of the case, this by itself cannot be the reason to disallow the exemption claimed. 3. For that the Ld. AO -ITO Exemption has no jurisdiction to reject the claim

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Charitable and Chaleshwar Temple Trust Vs CIT (207 ITR 368) (Bom)(HC) has held as under:- Surya Realcon P Ltd. Vs DCIT On a careful reading of section 139 of the Act, we are of the clear opinion that sub-sections (1) and (4) of section 139 have to be read together and on such a reading, the inevitable conclusion

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Charitable and Chaleshwar Temple Trust Vs CIT (207 ITR 368) (Bom)(HC) has held as under:- Surya Realcon P Ltd. Vs DCIT On a careful reading of section 139 of the Act, we are of the clear opinion that sub-sections (1) and (4) of section 139 have to be read together and on such a reading, the inevitable conclusion

INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. DUKHHARAN MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.261/Ran/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Ito, Exemption Ward, Ranchi ….…………….……...................……….……Appellant Vs. Dudhharan Memorial Charitable Trust.…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Rani Hospital Behind Machlighar Booty Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand – 834001. [Pan: Aactd1772A] Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Md. Shadab Ahmed, Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 18, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 14, 2026 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Nfac, Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)”) Dated 20.03.2024 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”).

11 on ground that assessee-trust paid salary to one of trustee and, thus, there was violation of provisions of section 13(1)(c), in view of fact that payment of salary was being made since inception of trust and it had not been disputed by revenue in earlier years and, moreover, said trustee was exclusively working for trust, impugned

ACIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, RANCHI vs. M/S. R.V.S. EDUCATIONAL TRUST, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am (Through : Hybrid Mode) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.24/Ran/2020 (Ǔ""ȡ[""""[/ A.Y. :2016-2017) Acit, Exemption Circle, Ranchi Vs. M/S Rvs Educational Trust, C/O Binda Apartments (India) Private Limited, Siroman Nagar, Dimna Road, Mango, Jamshedpur-831012 ̾Ĉĭēıĕĸù Ĭĝń/Pan No. : Aaatr4456M (\ "Ȣ"ȡ"ȸ/Appellant) (Ĥ×""ȸ/ Respondent) ..

charitable purpose and held that the assesse was entitled to the benefits under section 11 and 12 of the said Act. (ii) Disallowance of Capital Expenditure of Rs.4,39,31,322/- (a) That the assesse trust has made capital expenditure for different units during the year which are as under:- R.V.S. College of Engineering & Technology Rs.2,48,23,302/- R.V.S

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust to prove the fact that it is a charitable or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act, the assessee did not get any notice therefore, the assessee could not comply to the queries made by the Ld. CIT(E). Accordingly, the application for granting regular registration was rejected. He therefore

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust to prove the fact that it is a charitable or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act, the assessee did not get any notice therefore, the assessee could not comply to the queries made by the Ld. CIT(E). Accordingly, the application for granting regular registration was rejected. He therefore

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust to prove the fact that it is a charitable or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act, the assessee did not get any notice therefore, the assessee could not comply to the queries made by the Ld. CIT(E). Accordingly, the application for granting regular registration was rejected. He therefore

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust to prove the fact that it is a charitable or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act, the assessee did not get any notice therefore, the assessee could not comply to the queries made by the Ld. CIT(E). Accordingly, the application for granting regular registration was rejected. He therefore

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust to prove the fact that it is a charitable or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act, the assessee did not get any notice therefore, the assessee could not comply to the queries made by the Ld. CIT(E). Accordingly, the application for granting regular registration was rejected. He therefore

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust to prove the fact that it is a charitable or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act, the assessee did not get any notice therefore, the assessee could not comply to the queries made by the Ld. CIT(E). Accordingly, the application for granting regular registration was rejected. He therefore

M/S CHURCH SCHOOL,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT, JAMSHEPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee being ITA No

6. Being not satisfied with the order of the CIT-A, now the assessee and the revenue both in appeal before us challenging the impugned order of the CIT-A. 7. Before us the ld.AR submits that the assessee is a premier institute in the city of Jamshedpur and is known for its charitable activities across the society irrespective

ACIT.CIRCLE-1 ,, RANCHI vs. MOHINI DEVI CHARITABLE TRUST, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act. The ld. CIT(Appeals) has rightly followed the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona, reported in (2018) 300 CTR 1 (SC)/ 89 taxmann.com 127. After considering the reasoned finding of the ld. CIT(Appeals), we do not find any error

ITO EXEMPTION WARD , JAMSHEDPUR vs. ALL INDIA WOMEN'S CONFERENCE , JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assesse are allowed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

6. Hence, I am of the opinion that the A.O. has rightly disallowed the exemption as claimed u/s 11 by the assessee. “ 7. The assessee submitted the counter comments vide letter dated 11.09.2014 as under: "In response to your letter dated 2nd September 2014, we submit as follows:- (1) Aims and object of the trust are as follows

JUSCO EDUCATION MISSION FOUNDATION ,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE , RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

trust and allow the said ground. However the Ld. CIT (Appeals) is highly unjustified in simultaneously treating the excess of income over expenditure as per Profit & Loss A/C without considering the exemptions u/s 11 without any reason and confirming the addition of Rs. 1,71,97,154/- and the same is liable to be deleted