M/S NAI PAHAL FOUNDATION,RANCHI vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : Na M/S Nai Pahal Foundation, Vs Cit(E), Patna 13P, Srs Park Phase-1, Tatisilway Industrial Area Khelgaon Road, Ranchi-845103 Pan No. : Aacan 4248 A .. Respondent (Appellant) Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Ar Revenue By : Shri A.K.Mohanty, Jcit(Jr.Dr) Date Of Hearing : 26.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.11.2018 O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(E)

Charitable Trust, [2011] 15 taxmann.com 123 (Punjab & Haryana) has held as under :- 5 “8. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant, but find no merit in the present appeals. As per Section 12AA of the Act, an application for registration of the Trust and Institution is required to be made within one year from the date of creation

ACIT vs. M/S XAVIER INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SERVICE,

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year: 2009-2010

5 IT A No.1 00/R an/2 014 Asse ssmen t Year: 2 009 -20 10 04/1071-73 dated 15.12.2003. The assessee is a trust and exemption under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Act for the F.Y. 2009-10 was granted to the assessee on 8.9.2009 vide Memo No.CCIT/Ran/Tech/10(23C)/13/2008-09/4351-4410. It has also been accepted by both the AO during

S S CHARITABLE TRUST,DUMKA vs. CIT APPEAL, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee-trust stands allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.49/Ran/2022 Assessment Year: 2016-17 S S Charitable Trust..….…..…………..…...…......................……...…..….. Appellant S S Vidya Vihar School, New Kumar Para, Near Dudhani Rasikpur, Asharam Road, Jharkhand-814110. [Pan: Aafts1387R] Vs. Ito, Exemption Ward, Ranchi…………………….……….…………….. Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 02, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 28, 2023 Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee-Trust Against The Order Dated 30.03.2022 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

section 11 and 12 of the Act. 7. In the result, the appeal of the assessee-trust stands allowed. Kolkata, the 28th April, 2023. [Rajesh Kumar] [Sanjay Garg] Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 28.04.2023. RS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. S S Charitable Trust 2. ITO, Exemption Ward, Ranchi 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT- , 5

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Charitable and Chaleshwar Temple Trust Vs CIT (207 ITR 368) (Bom)(HC) has held as under:- Surya Realcon P Ltd. Vs DCIT On a careful reading of section 139 of the Act, we are of the clear opinion that sub-sections (1) and (4) of section 139 have to be read together and on such a reading, the inevitable conclusion

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Charitable and Chaleshwar Temple Trust Vs CIT (207 ITR 368) (Bom)(HC) has held as under:- Surya Realcon P Ltd. Vs DCIT On a careful reading of section 139 of the Act, we are of the clear opinion that sub-sections (1) and (4) of section 139 have to be read together and on such a reading, the inevitable conclusion

HOLYFAITH TRIBAL W AND D TRUST ,RANCHI vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes only

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust, Ranchi, Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust, Ranchi, I.T.O., 406, Midland East Apartment, 406, Midland East Apartment, Exemption Ward, Exemption Ward, Vs. Anantpur, Chutia, Doranda, Anantpur, Chutia, Doranda, Ranchi. Ranchi-834002 (Jharkhand) 834002 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaath 5200 R Aaath 5200 R Appellant/ Assessee Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Respondent/ Revenue

charitable or religious purposes. During course of assessment proceedings, it was found by the Assessing Officer that out of ₹ 63,99,901/- of foreign contribution received, ₹ 9,81,735/- was transferred from designated FC bank account to unautorised FC utilization bank account of the assessee trust. The same was established on perusal of debit entries of bank of India account

SHREE SREE BALANANDA TRUST,DEOGHAR vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD,, DHANBAD

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryshree Sree Balananda Trust, I.T.O., Sri Sri Balananda Ashram, Karinabad, Exemption Ward, Vs. Deoghar, Dist.- Deoghar, Dhanbad. Jharkhand-841112 Pan No. Aabts 0579 H Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Charitable Trust v. Union of India [1992] 193 ITR 95, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court held that as per the provisions of Section 143(1)(a) of the Act the Assessing Officer could allow or disallow only such claims which were admissible/inadmissible on the basis of the returns and documents accompanying the return. It was also held that

ITO EXEMPTION WARD , JAMSHEDPUR vs. ALL INDIA WOMEN'S CONFERENCE , JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assesse are allowed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

trust funds for charitable purposes. 5. For that in view of the case, the CIT(A) was not justified in not giving exemption to the income of the appellant. In the process the CIT(A) was not justified in confirming the order of the AO.’ 9. Ld Authorised Representative of the assesse submitted that the issues under consideration are covered

INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. DUKHHARAN MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.261/Ran/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Ito, Exemption Ward, Ranchi ….…………….……...................……….……Appellant Vs. Dudhharan Memorial Charitable Trust.…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Rani Hospital Behind Machlighar Booty Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand – 834001. [Pan: Aactd1772A] Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Md. Shadab Ahmed, Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 18, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 14, 2026 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Nfac, Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)”) Dated 20.03.2024 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”).

11 on ground that assessee-trust paid salary to one of trustee and, thus, there was violation of provisions of section 13(1)(c), in view of fact that payment of salary was being made since inception of trust and it had not been disputed by revenue in earlier years and, moreover, said trustee was exclusively working for trust, impugned

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust to prove the fact that it is a charitable or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act, the assessee did not get any notice therefore, the assessee could not comply to the queries made by the Ld. CIT(E). Accordingly, the application for granting regular registration was rejected. He therefore

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust to prove the fact that it is a charitable or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act, the assessee did not get any notice therefore, the assessee could not comply to the queries made by the Ld. CIT(E). Accordingly, the application for granting regular registration was rejected. He therefore

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust to prove the fact that it is a charitable or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act, the assessee did not get any notice therefore, the assessee could not comply to the queries made by the Ld. CIT(E). Accordingly, the application for granting regular registration was rejected. He therefore

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust to prove the fact that it is a charitable or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act, the assessee did not get any notice therefore, the assessee could not comply to the queries made by the Ld. CIT(E). Accordingly, the application for granting regular registration was rejected. He therefore

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust to prove the fact that it is a charitable or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act, the assessee did not get any notice therefore, the assessee could not comply to the queries made by the Ld. CIT(E). Accordingly, the application for granting regular registration was rejected. He therefore

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

trust to prove the fact that it is a charitable or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act, the assessee did not get any notice therefore, the assessee could not comply to the queries made by the Ld. CIT(E). Accordingly, the application for granting regular registration was rejected. He therefore

M/S CHURCH SCHOOL,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT, JAMSHEPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee being ITA No

5. Aggrieved by such order of AO, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT-A, who deleted the addition made on account of depreciation and sustained the additions made on account of income over expenditure and donation. 6. Being not satisfied with the order of the CIT-A, now the assessee and the revenue both in appeal before

ACIT.CIRCLE-1 ,, RANCHI vs. MOHINI DEVI CHARITABLE TRUST, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act. The ld. CIT(Appeals) has rightly followed the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona, reported in (2018) 300 CTR 1 (SC)/ 89 taxmann.com 127. After considering the reasoned finding of the ld. CIT(Appeals), we do not find any error

ACIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, RANCHI vs. M/S. R.V.S. EDUCATIONAL TRUST, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am (Through : Hybrid Mode) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.24/Ran/2020 (Ǔ""ȡ[""""[/ A.Y. :2016-2017) Acit, Exemption Circle, Ranchi Vs. M/S Rvs Educational Trust, C/O Binda Apartments (India) Private Limited, Siroman Nagar, Dimna Road, Mango, Jamshedpur-831012 ̾Ĉĭēıĕĸù Ĭĝń/Pan No. : Aaatr4456M (\ "Ȣ"ȡ"ȸ/Appellant) (Ĥ×""ȸ/ Respondent) ..

charitable purpose and held that the assesse was entitled to the benefits under section 11 and 12 of the said Act. (ii) Disallowance of Capital Expenditure of Rs.4,39,31,322/- (a) That the assesse trust has made capital expenditure for different units during the year which are as under:- R.V.S. College of Engineering & Technology Rs.2,48,23,302/- R.V.S