SARVODAYA WELFARE SOCIETY,RANCHI vs. CIT EXEMPTION , PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : Na Sarvodya Welfare Society, Vs Cit(E), Patna Bethany Convent Compound, Kadru Road, Near Kadru Over Bridger, P.Odoranda, Dist-Ranchi- 834002 Pan/Gir No. : Aanas 3371 A .. Respondent (Appellant) Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Ar Revenue By : Shri Inderjit Singh, Cit(Sr.Dr) Date Of Hearing : 22.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.11.2018

C) or Sections 11 and 12 are not applicable while considering the application for registration under Section 12AA of the Act. The application for registration is required to be made within one year of the creation of the Trust. Section 12AA of the Act, requires satisfaction in respect of the genuineness of the activities of the Trust, which includes

AAKANKSHA UTPRERAK SAMAJIK SANSTHA,DHANBAD vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : Na Aakanksha Utprerak Vs Cit(E), Patna Samajik Sanstha, Nawagarh More, Po-Kharkharee, Dhanbad-828125 Pan No. : Aacaa 2234 K .. Respondent (Appellant) Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Ar Revenue By : Shri Inderjit Singh, Cit(Sr.Dr) Date Of Hearing : 26.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.11.2018 O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(E)

C) or Sections 11 and 12 are not applicable while considering the application for registration under Section 12AA of the Act. The application for registration is required to be made within one year of the creation of the Trust. Section 12AA of the Act, requires satisfaction in respect of the genuineness of the activities of the Trust, which includes

M/S NAI PAHAL FOUNDATION,RANCHI vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : Na M/S Nai Pahal Foundation, Vs Cit(E), Patna 13P, Srs Park Phase-1, Tatisilway Industrial Area Khelgaon Road, Ranchi-845103 Pan No. : Aacan 4248 A .. Respondent (Appellant) Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Ar Revenue By : Shri A.K.Mohanty, Jcit(Jr.Dr) Date Of Hearing : 26.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.11.2018 O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(E)

C) or Sections 11 and 12 are not applicable while considering the 6 application for registration under Section 12AA of the Act. The application for registration is required to be made within one year of the creation of the Trust. Section 12AA of the Act, requires satisfaction in respect of the genuineness of the activities of the Trust, which includes

ACIT vs. M/S XAVIER INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SERVICE,

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year: 2009-2010

charitable trust as contemplated by section 11(1)(a) and Section 7 IT A No.1 00/R an/2 014 Asse ssmen t Year: 2 009 -20 10 10(23)(C

INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. DUKHHARAN MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.261/Ran/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Ito, Exemption Ward, Ranchi ….…………….……...................……….……Appellant Vs. Dudhharan Memorial Charitable Trust.…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Rani Hospital Behind Machlighar Booty Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand – 834001. [Pan: Aactd1772A] Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Md. Shadab Ahmed, Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 18, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 14, 2026 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Nfac, Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)”) Dated 20.03.2024 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”).

Charitable Trust ₹1,20,000/- to Manorama Sinha respectively. The Assessing Officer held that the above payments were excessive and unreasonable, and accordingly invoked the provisions of section 13(1)(c) of the Act, thereby denying exemption under section 11

ITO EXEMPTION WARD , JAMSHEDPUR vs. ALL INDIA WOMEN'S CONFERENCE , JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assesse are allowed

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

1) Aims and object of the trust are as follows:- (a) To help handicapped. mentally retarded and needy women and children to earn their livelihood by opening avenues of employment and maintain orphanage to bring up children born of leper parents till they are settled in life. It will be purely philanthropic and charitable institution without any profit motive

CHANDRAVANSHI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION,GARHWA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Chandravanshi Educational Foundation, C.I.T.(Exemption), C/O-R C Chandravanshi Welfare Trust, Patna. Vs. Garhwa-833114 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aagcc 7713 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

C Chandravanshi Welfare Trust, Patna. Vs. Garhwa-833114 (Jharkhand) PAN No. AAGCC 7713 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Assessee represented by Shri Devesh Poddar, A.R. Department represented by Shri Kanhaiya Lal Kanak, CIT-DR Date of hearing 12/11/2025 Date of pronouncement 29/01/2026 O R D E R PER: RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY, A.M. 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed

ACIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, RANCHI vs. M/S. R.V.S. EDUCATIONAL TRUST, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am (Through : Hybrid Mode) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.24/Ran/2020 (Ǔ""ȡ[""""[/ A.Y. :2016-2017) Acit, Exemption Circle, Ranchi Vs. M/S Rvs Educational Trust, C/O Binda Apartments (India) Private Limited, Siroman Nagar, Dimna Road, Mango, Jamshedpur-831012 ̾Ĉĭēıĕĸù Ĭĝń/Pan No. : Aaatr4456M (\ "Ȣ"ȡ"ȸ/Appellant) (Ĥ×""ȸ/ Respondent) ..

1)(a) of the Act. Similar view has been taken by the Hon'ble Rajesthan High Court in Maharana of Mewar Charitable Foundation. In the case of Hon'ble Delhi Court in the case of DIT (E) Vs span foundation 178 Taxman, 436(Del), it was held that on payment of funds borrowed for construction of the building wasto

M/S CHURCH SCHOOL,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT, JAMSHEPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee being ITA No

1, held that what is necessary to be considered is whether having regard to all the facts and circumstances of the case, the dominant object of the activity is profit making or carrying out a charitable purpose and in the case of assessee it has never been used for profit motive and all receipts are being used for educational purposes