BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 10(29)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi576Karnataka511Mumbai478Chennai283Bangalore265Jaipur161Pune154Ahmedabad133Hyderabad91Chandigarh87Kolkata74Lucknow52Cochin50Indore41Amritsar40Cuttack32Rajkot27Agra21Visakhapatnam20Nagpur19Surat18Allahabad17Calcutta16Telangana14SC11Raipur7Jodhpur7Kerala5Varanasi5Rajasthan4Patna3Jabalpur2Punjab & Haryana2Andhra Pradesh2Ranchi2Dehradun2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 114Section 10(23)(c)2Section 12A2Exemption2Addition to Income2

M/S CHURCH SCHOOL,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT, JAMSHEPUR

In the result, the appeal of assessee being ITA No

ITA 103/RAN/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi16 May 2018AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Anshul Ringasia, Advocate, ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Mondal, JCIT, ld.Sr.DR
Section 10(23)(c)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 234B

section 10(23)( c )(vi) of the IT Act and has held that mere surplus does not mean that institution is existing for M/s. Church School making profit. The predominant object test must be applied. Hon’ble Apex Court while affirming the decision of Punjab and Haryana High court in case of Pine Grove international charitable trust v/s Union

ITO EXEMPTION WARD , JAMSHEDPUR vs. ALL INDIA WOMEN'S CONFERENCE , JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assesse are allowed

ITA 230/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Nov 2018

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A.K.Mohanty, JCIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 215Section 271(1)(c)

charitable purposes and is being utilised for the personal benefit of the trustee or management of the society. In our considered view the activities carried on by the trust are in the nature of general public utility and not the activity of business. Merely from the fact that the assessee during the financial years 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009- 10