BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

39 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 1clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,939Delhi1,594Chennai1,110Ahmedabad872Pune808Bangalore808Karnataka619Jaipur519Kolkata475Hyderabad310Chandigarh254Surat228Cochin210Amritsar200Cuttack155Rajkot152Lucknow146Indore140Visakhapatnam127Nagpur104Agra64Raipur63Allahabad57Jodhpur54Patna51Calcutta41Telangana39Ranchi39SC25Panaji24Jabalpur21Dehradun21Varanasi19Guwahati16Kerala13Rajasthan10Punjab & Haryana9Orissa6Andhra Pradesh2Himachal Pradesh2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 12A134Section 1148Exemption35Section 2(15)23Section 80G18Section 1017Section 12A(1)(ac)12Addition to Income10Charitable Trust10

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 4/RAN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)(a)Section 801Section 801B

Charitable and Chaleshwar Temple Trust Vs CIT (207 ITR 368) (Bom)(HC) has held as under:- Surya Realcon P Ltd. Vs DCIT On a careful reading of section 139 of the Act, we are of the clear opinion that sub-sections (1

SURYA REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED,SARAIDHELA, DHANBAD vs. DCIT, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, DHANBAD

Showing 1–20 of 39 · Page 1 of 2

Section 143(1)(a)9
Section 801B8
Deduction7

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 5/RAN/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)(a)Section 801Section 801B

Charitable and Chaleshwar Temple Trust Vs CIT (207 ITR 368) (Bom)(HC) has held as under:- Surya Realcon P Ltd. Vs DCIT On a careful reading of section 139 of the Act, we are of the clear opinion that sub-sections (1

SHREE SREE BALANANDA TRUST,DEOGHAR vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD,, DHANBAD

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 16/RAN/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi04 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryshree Sree Balananda Trust, I.T.O., Sri Sri Balananda Ashram, Karinabad, Exemption Ward, Vs. Deoghar, Dist.- Deoghar, Dhanbad. Jharkhand-841112 Pan No. Aabts 0579 H Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 11Section 13(9)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 154

Section 143(1)(a) of the Act and the same was confined only to such adjustments specifically enumerated in the proviso (i), (ii) and (iii) of the Act. In the case of S.R.F. Charitable Trust

SARVODAYA WELFARE SOCIETY,RANCHI vs. CIT EXEMPTION , PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 237/RAN/2017[17-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi26 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : Na Sarvodya Welfare Society, Vs Cit(E), Patna Bethany Convent Compound, Kadru Road, Near Kadru Over Bridger, P.Odoranda, Dist-Ranchi- 834002 Pan/Gir No. : Aanas 3371 A .. Respondent (Appellant) Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Ar Revenue By : Shri Inderjit Singh, Cit(Sr.Dr) Date Of Hearing : 22.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.11.2018

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Inderjit Singh, CIT(Sr.DR)
Section 12A

1 4(ii) which reads as under :- “4(ii). To establish, manage, administer, carry on, conduct, support and promote formal, non-formal education of all levels, Environment Protection Women and Child Development, Health Care Services, Care of the Aged and Handicapped, Centre for distressed children and women, Legal Aid centres, Uplift and relief of the poor, and the weaker sections

M/S NAI PAHAL FOUNDATION,RANCHI vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 268/RAN/2016[]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi26 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : Na M/S Nai Pahal Foundation, Vs Cit(E), Patna 13P, Srs Park Phase-1, Tatisilway Industrial Area Khelgaon Road, Ranchi-845103 Pan No. : Aacan 4248 A .. Respondent (Appellant) Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Ar Revenue By : Shri A.K.Mohanty, Jcit(Jr.Dr) Date Of Hearing : 26.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.11.2018 O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(E)

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, ARFor Respondent: Shri A.K.Mohanty, JCIT(Jr.DR)
Section 11Section 12A

trust were not questioned by the Commissioner. Considering the fact that the continuance of registration is further a subject matter of scrutiny by the Commissioner as contemplated under section 12AA(3), the revenue would not be justified in refusing the registration at the threshold.” [Para 9] 10. In the instant case, we find that the CIT(E) has refused registration

AAKANKSHA UTPRERAK SAMAJIK SANSTHA,DHANBAD vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 6/RAN/2017[]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi28 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year : Na Aakanksha Utprerak Vs Cit(E), Patna Samajik Sanstha, Nawagarh More, Po-Kharkharee, Dhanbad-828125 Pan No. : Aacaa 2234 K .. Respondent (Appellant) Assessee By : Shri Devesh Poddar, Ar Revenue By : Shri Inderjit Singh, Cit(Sr.Dr) Date Of Hearing : 26.11.2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.11.2018 O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(E)

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Poddar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Inderjit Singh, CIT(Sr.DR)
Section 11Section 12A

trust were not questioned by the Commissioner. Considering the fact that the continuance of registration is further a subject matter of scrutiny by the Commissioner as contemplated under section 12AA(3), the revenue would not be justified in refusing the registration at the threshold.” [Para 9] 10. In the instant case, we find that the CIT(E) has refused registration

THE HAZARIBAGH CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,HAZARIBAG vs. ACIT, HAZARIBAG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 158/RAN/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi09 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: BEFORES/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Podar, AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Rinku Singh, CIT DR
Section 11(1)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)

Charitable and Chaleshwar Temple Trust vs CIT, 207 ITR 368 (Bom), wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has categorically held that the provisions of section 139(1

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 305/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi18 Sept 2025

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act. Therefore, the application filed in Form 10AB for grant of regular registration under sub clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 300/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi18 Sept 2025

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act. Therefore, the application filed in Form 10AB for grant of regular registration under sub clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 304/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi18 Sept 2025

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act. Therefore, the application filed in Form 10AB for grant of regular registration under sub clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1

VISHWA NIRMALA DHARMA TRUST JAMSHEDPUR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 306/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi18 Sept 2025

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act. Therefore, the application filed in Form 10AB for grant of regular registration under sub clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1

SATYALOK KRIYA YOGA,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 301/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi18 Sept 2025

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act. Therefore, the application filed in Form 10AB for grant of regular registration under sub clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1

G D RUNGTA FOUNDATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD, JSR, JAMSHEDPUR

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 303/RAN/2024[NOT APPLICABLE]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi18 Sept 2025

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

trust wholly for charitable Satyalok Kriya Yoga, Vishwa Nirmala Dharma, G.D. Rungta Foundation or religious purposes within the meaning of section 11 read with section 2(15) of the Act. Therefore, the application filed in Form 10AB for grant of regular registration under sub clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1

ACIT vs. M/S XAVIER INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SERVICE,

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 100/RAN/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi30 May 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year: 2009-2010

For Appellant: Shri B.K.Banka, CAFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Sutariaya, CIT (DR)
Section 10Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 35A

charitable trust as contemplated by section 11(1)(a) and Section 7 IT A No.1 00/R an/2 014 Asse ssmen

ACIT.CIRCLE-1 ,, RANCHI vs. MOHINI DEVI CHARITABLE TRUST, VARANASI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 360/RAN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi18 Oct 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 11(1)Section 12A

section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act. The ld. CIT(Appeals) has rightly followed the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona, reported in (2018) 300 CTR 1 (SC)/ 89 taxmann.com 127. After considering the reasoned finding of the ld. CIT(Appeals), we do not find any error

S S CHARITABLE TRUST,DUMKA vs. CIT APPEAL, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee-trust stands allowed

ITA 49/RAN/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi28 Apr 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.49/Ran/2022 Assessment Year: 2016-17 S S Charitable Trust..….…..…………..…...…......................……...…..….. Appellant S S Vidya Vihar School, New Kumar Para, Near Dudhani Rasikpur, Asharam Road, Jharkhand-814110. [Pan: Aafts1387R] Vs. Ito, Exemption Ward, Ranchi…………………….……….…………….. Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 02, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 28, 2023 Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee-Trust Against The Order Dated 30.03.2022 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 119(2)(b)Section 234Section 250

section 11 and 12 of the Act. 7. In the result, the appeal of the assessee-trust stands allowed. Kolkata, the 28th April, 2023. [Rajesh Kumar] [Sanjay Garg] Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 28.04.2023. RS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. S S Charitable

JAMSHEDPUR MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION,JAMSHEDPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, PATNA, PATNA

In the result, grounds of appeals raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 157/RAN/2023[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 May 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Jamshedpur Management Association, C.I.T.(Exemption), 18, Centre For Excellence, Ch Area Patna Vs. (East), Jamshedpur-831001 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaeaj 2108 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)

1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) erred in rejecting the application for registration u/s 12AA made on 08th December, 2021 without establishing that the activities of the assessee institute as well as the objects of the Trust were in genuine. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case

HOLYFAITH TRIBAL W AND D TRUST ,RANCHI vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 69/RAN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Before Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayshri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust, Ranchi, Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust, Ranchi, I.T.O., 406, Midland East Apartment, 406, Midland East Apartment, Exemption Ward, Exemption Ward, Vs. Anantpur, Chutia, Doranda, Anantpur, Chutia, Doranda, Ranchi. Ranchi-834002 (Jharkhand) 834002 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaath 5200 R Aaath 5200 R Appellant/ Assessee Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue Respondent/ Revenue

Section 11Section 13(1)Section 133(6)Section 17

Section 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued, in response to which the Secretary of the Trust appeared and produced the documents required for verification of the P a g e 3 | 7 Holyfaith Tribal W & D Trust Vs ITO(E) application of income for charitable

INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. DUKHHARAN MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 261/RAN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi14 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.261/Ran/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Ito, Exemption Ward, Ranchi ….…………….……...................……….……Appellant Vs. Dudhharan Memorial Charitable Trust.…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Rani Hospital Behind Machlighar Booty Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand – 834001. [Pan: Aactd1772A] Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Md. Shadab Ahmed, Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 18, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 14, 2026 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Nfac, Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)”) Dated 20.03.2024 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”).

Section 11Section 13(1)(c)Section 250

Charitable Trust ₹1,20,000/- to Manorama Sinha respectively. The Assessing Officer held that the above payments were excessive and unreasonable, and accordingly invoked the provisions of section

CHANDRAVANSHI EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION,GARHWA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PATNA

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 473/RAN/2024[-]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Jan 2026

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Chandravanshi Educational Foundation, C.I.T.(Exemption), C/O-R C Chandravanshi Welfare Trust, Patna. Vs. Garhwa-833114 (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aagcc 7713 F Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 2(15)

1)(ac)(vi) in Form No. 10AC dated 24/09/2021 on the ground that the applicant failed to prove the genuineness of its activities claimed to have been made in accordance with the objects for which the society was constituted wholly for charitable or religious purposes within the meaning of Section 11 read with section