BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “charitable trust”+ Addition to Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,170Delhi992Chennai680Karnataka492Bangalore461Ahmedabad334Pune275Jaipur254Kolkata232Hyderabad178Chandigarh139Cochin120Amritsar85Lucknow79Indore71Surat70Rajkot66Cuttack49Allahabad49Visakhapatnam43Nagpur39Agra37Raipur32Jodhpur30Telangana26Patna23Calcutta19SC14Panaji14Guwahati13Dehradun13Jabalpur11Varanasi10Kerala9Ranchi8Rajasthan4Orissa3Himachal Pradesh2Andhra Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana2J&K1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 1111Section 12A7Exemption7Addition to Income7Section 143(1)(a)5Deduction4Charitable Trust4Section 2503Section 139(4)3Section 139(1)

ACIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, RANCHI vs. M/S. R.V.S. EDUCATIONAL TRUST, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 24/RAN/2020[16-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi21 May 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am (Through : Hybrid Mode) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.24/Ran/2020 (Ǔ""ȡ[""""[/ A.Y. :2016-2017) Acit, Exemption Circle, Ranchi Vs. M/S Rvs Educational Trust, C/O Binda Apartments (India) Private Limited, Siroman Nagar, Dimna Road, Mango, Jamshedpur-831012 ̾Ĉĭēıĕĸù Ĭĝń/Pan No. : Aaatr4456M (\ "Ȣ"ȡ"ȸ/Appellant) (Ĥ×""ȸ/ Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Shikesh Jha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Shiv Swaroop Singh, CIT-DR
Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 143(3)

income for charitable purpose and held that the assesse was entitled to the benefits under section 11 and 12 of the said Act. (ii) Disallowance of Capital Expenditure of Rs.4,39,31,322/- (a) That the assesse trust has made capital expenditure for different units during the year which are as under:- R.V.S. College of Engineering & Technology Rs.2

3
Section 11(1)3
Disallowance3

S S CHARITABLE TRUST,DUMKA vs. CIT APPEAL, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee-trust stands allowed

ITA 49/RAN/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi28 Apr 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.49/Ran/2022 Assessment Year: 2016-17 S S Charitable Trust..….…..…………..…...…......................……...…..….. Appellant S S Vidya Vihar School, New Kumar Para, Near Dudhani Rasikpur, Asharam Road, Jharkhand-814110. [Pan: Aafts1387R] Vs. Ito, Exemption Ward, Ranchi…………………….……….…………….. Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 02, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 28, 2023 Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee-Trust Against The Order Dated 30.03.2022 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 119(2)(b)Section 234Section 250

Income Tax Act by the ld Assessing Officer. 6. Any other grounds of appeal, if any, will be urged at the time of hearing.” 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a trust registered u/s 11 and 12 of the Act as a charitable institution. The assessee-trust engaged in running of an educational institution

INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. DUKHHARAN MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 261/RAN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi14 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.261/Ran/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Ito, Exemption Ward, Ranchi ….…………….……...................……….……Appellant Vs. Dudhharan Memorial Charitable Trust.…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Rani Hospital Behind Machlighar Booty Road, Ranchi, Jharkhand – 834001. [Pan: Aactd1772A] Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Md. Shadab Ahmed, Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : December 18, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 14, 2026 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Nfac, Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)”) Dated 20.03.2024 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”).

Section 11Section 13(1)(c)Section 250

Charitable Trust ₹1,20,000/- to Manorama Sinha respectively. The Assessing Officer held that the above payments were excessive and unreasonable, and accordingly invoked the provisions of section 13(1)(c) of the Act, thereby denying exemption under section 11 of the Act and making additions to the income

DCIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, RANCHI vs. M/S JAMSHEDPUR DIOCEASAN EDUCATION SOCIETY, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is, hereby, dismissed

ITA 122/RAN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi10 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A No.122/Ran/2019 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Dcit, Exemption Circle, Ranchi..................................................……Appellant Vs. M/S Jamshedpur Diocesan Education Society…..........……...…..…..Respondent Bishop’S House, Golmuri, Jamshedpur-831003. [Pan: Aaatj8652K] Appearances By: Shri Yogesh Agarwal, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Pranob Kr. Koley, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : May 22, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : July 10, 2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Dated 26.11.2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Jamshedpur (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’) Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. The Revenue Is Aggrieved By The Action Of The Cit(A) In Allowing The Deduction U/S 11 Of The Act To The Assessee-Society Which Was Deducted By The Assessing Officer Observing That The Assessee-Society Was Carrying Out Its Educational Activities On Profit Motive Basis. 3. The Assessee-Society I.E. M/S Jamsedpur Diocesan Education Society Is A Society Engaged In Running Of Educational Institutions. The Society Is Registered Vide Registration No.943/2010-11 By The Director

Section 11Section 12ASection 250

trust, duly registered u/s 12AA of the Act with all benefits as per section 11 of the Act. 3.6 As held above the society is involved in charitable activities by providing education to children. No society can perform any charitable activities without acquiring fund for its object related expenditure. The appellant society does not get any aid either from Government

JUSCO EDUCATION MISSION FOUNDATION ,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DCIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE , RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 2/RAN/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi30 May 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 144ASection 2(15)Section 234B

Trust, rejected the claim of the society that it is doing charitable activities on the ground that Section 12A of the Act provides pre-condition for evaluating exemption under the Act subject to the society is imparting education for charitable purpose and not for earning any profit. The ld. CIT(A) then confirmed the addition

THE HAZARIBAGH CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,HAZARIBAG vs. ACIT, HAZARIBAG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 158/RAN/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi09 Jun 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: BEFORES/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Devesh Podar, AdvFor Respondent: Smt. Rinku Singh, CIT DR
Section 11(1)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)

addition. 4. In reply, ld CIT DR submitted the decision of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Trustee of Tulsidar Gopaji Charitable and Chaleshwar Temple Trust (supra) was in relation to the provisions of section 11(1) of the Act. It was P a g e 3 | 6 Assessment Year : 2016-17 the submission that when

SHREE SREE BALANANDA TRUST,DEOGHAR vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD,, DHANBAD

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 16/RAN/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi04 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryshree Sree Balananda Trust, I.T.O., Sri Sri Balananda Ashram, Karinabad, Exemption Ward, Vs. Deoghar, Dist.- Deoghar, Dhanbad. Jharkhand-841112 Pan No. Aabts 0579 H Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 11Section 13(9)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 154

Charitable Trust v. Union of India [1992] 193 ITR 95, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court held that as per the provisions of Section 143(1)(a) of the Act the Assessing Officer could allow or disallow only such claims which were admissible/inadmissible on the basis of the returns and documents accompanying the return. It was also held that

PATEL SEVA SANGH,BOKARO STEEL CITY vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE), RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 486/RAN/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Jan 2026AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Patel Seva Sangh, I.T.O., C/O-Sardar Patel Public School, Sector- Exemption, Vs. 9, Bokaro-827009 (Jharkhand) Hazaribagh. Pan No. Aabtp 2202 N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 143(2)Section 144Section 44ASection 56

charitable institutions. 3. That Ld. Commissioner Appeal has erred in confirming addition made by The Learned Assessing Officer (AO) has erred in law and on facts in estimating the income of the assessed at 20% of the gross receipts by arbitrarily relying on Income Patel Seva Sangh Vs ITO Tax Return (ITR) figures of previous years, which are pending adjudication