BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 81clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,010Delhi1,518Bangalore637Chennai457Ahmedabad445Kolkata331Jaipur319Hyderabad256Chandigarh216Surat201Cochin159Indore159Pune157Karnataka132Visakhapatnam95Raipur94Cuttack58Calcutta58Nagpur50Lucknow42Rajkot39Amritsar34Guwahati28SC24Telangana20Agra14Dehradun12Jodhpur11Panaji9Jabalpur7Patna7Rajasthan5Ranchi3Orissa2Allahabad2MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Andhra Pradesh1Gauhati1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Kerala1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)10Section 2746Long Term Capital Gains3Section 132(1)2Section 132(4)2Section 153A2Capital Gains2Penalty2Undisclosed Income2

ASHOK BEHL,RANCHI vs. ITO,WARD-1(1), RANCHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 78/RAN/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi10 Sept 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S, Godara, Jm & Dr. A.L. Saini, Am Ashok Behl Vs. Ito, Ward-1(1), Ranchi 1St Floor, Samridhi Complex, South Office Para, Doranda, Ranchi – 834001. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Adwpb2438E (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""थ" / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri D. Sannigarh, ARFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Mohanti, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)

81,301 Rs. 22, 10, 501 Short Term Capital Gain Rs. 43,89,499 Therefore, the claim of the assessee regarding long term capital gain was not accepted by assessing officer and assessing officer treated a sum of Rs.43,89,499/- as short term capital gain and added to the total income of the assessee. 4. Aggrieved by the order

RINKU SINGH,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 81/RAN/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

81 & 82/Ran/2022 Rinku Singh Vs DCIT & 1 Anr Appeal 81/Ran/2022 for A.Y. 2015-16 as a lead case. In this appeal, the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: "1. That under the facts and circumstances of the case, no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) should had been levied, hence, the impugned order levying penalty

NITU SINGH,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 82/RAN/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 274

81 & 82/Ran/2022 Rinku Singh Vs DCIT & 1 Anr Appeal 81/Ran/2022 for A.Y. 2015-16 as a lead case. In this appeal, the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: "1. That under the facts and circumstances of the case, no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) should had been levied, hence, the impugned order levying penalty