Search: capital gains

7 results for “capital gains”+ Section 271(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)37 Section 153A23 Section 27421 Section 132(1)10 Section 2637 Undisclosed Income7 Section 271A6 Penalty6 Section 132(4)5 Capital Gains

PADAM KUMAR JAIN,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and copy of common order passed is to be placed on respective case files

ITA 16/RAN/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi17 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 132(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 271ASection 274Section 80G

capital gain only after an explanation sought by Assessing Officer and it was not a case of suo-moto explanation, Assessing Officer liable to invoke penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c). Similarly, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs Zoom Communication (P.) Ltd. reported in 191 Taxman 179 (Delhi)/ [2010] 327 ITR 510 (Delhi

PADAM KUMAR JAIN,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

PADAM KUMAR JAIN,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

PADAM KUMAR JAIN,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

M/S NANDLAL KESHARDEO,RANCHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE (1), RANCHI

RINKU SINGH,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

NITU SINGH,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

ALLIANCE DEALERS PVT.LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR

PADAM KUMAE JAIN,RANCHI vs. CIT, CENTRAL, PATNA