BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 120(4)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai695Delhi686Bangalore328Chandigarh144Ahmedabad144Chennai141Kolkata140Jaipur137Karnataka125Pune103Cochin89Hyderabad79Indore62Calcutta52Surat46Raipur44Cuttack38Visakhapatnam33Lucknow24Guwahati17Telangana9Agra8SC8Amritsar7Rajkot7Nagpur7Varanasi5Panaji5Rajasthan3Patna3Ranchi2Dehradun2Jabalpur2Kerala1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Allahabad1Andhra Pradesh1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 32(2)10Section 143(3)4Section 12Section 14A2Depreciation2Disallowance2Addition to Income2Set Off of Losses2Carry Forward of Losses

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

ITA 300/RAN/2017[09-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026

Bench: Hon'Ble Itat - By It Department Si No.

Section 1Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

gains of subsequent years without any limit whatsoever." 8. In the light of the judicial precedents on the issue especially that of the Hon'ble Gujarat High court in the case of General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. (supra), we find that the issue is covered in favour of the assessee, therefore, the ground taken by the revenue is rejected

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD

ITA 294/RAN/2017[12-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026

Bench: Hon'Ble Itat - By It Department Si No.

2
Section 1Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

gains of subsequent years without any limit whatsoever." 8. In the light of the judicial precedents on the issue especially that of the Hon'ble Gujarat High court in the case of General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. (supra), we find that the issue is covered in favour of the assessee, therefore, the ground taken by the revenue is rejected