Search: bogus purchases

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 56(2)(vii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 56(2)(vii)4 Section 143(3)4 Section 1483 Section 1473 Section 2502 Addition to Income2

KAVITA CHAURASIA,RANCHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(5), RANCHI, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 65/RAN/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

purchased the flat at a consideration Rs.14,75,000/- as settled vide agreement of sale dated 19.01.2011. 5. The ld. CIT(A) did not accept the above contention of the assessee observing that the advance payment of Rs.1,00,000/- as mentioned in the said agreement was paid in cash and therefore, as required u/s 56(2)(vii

KULDIP SINGH,RANCHI vs. DCIT/ACIT, CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 180/RAN/2025[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi10 Feb 2026

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.180/Ran/2025 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Kuldip Singh…………………….……….……...................……….……Appellant The Avenue Vishnupuri Marg, Upper Burdwan Compound, Lalpur, Ranchi- 834001. [Pan: Agjps6921P] Vs. Dcit/Acit, Circle-1, Ranchi…...…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Kailash Gautam, Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 05, 2026 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : February 10, 2026 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Nfac, Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)”) Dated 06.03.2025 Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”).