BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 47clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,401Delhi1,019Jaipur281Kolkata238Chennai216Bangalore170Ahmedabad170Chandigarh138Hyderabad115Karnataka111Indore110Surat105Pune80Cochin60Nagpur53Visakhapatnam49Rajkot48Raipur45Guwahati37Calcutta36Allahabad32Amritsar26Lucknow22Cuttack20Jodhpur19Agra17Telangana8Patna5Jabalpur4SC3Ranchi2Panaji2Dehradun2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 132(1)2Section 1482Section 1472Section 143(3)2Bogus/Accommodation Entry2Deduction2Addition to Income2Search & Seizure2

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR vs. M/S SURAJ SOLUTION PVT LTD, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, both appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the

ITA 72/RAN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 132(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

47,26,890/- making addition of Rs.93,75,381/- on account of clinker rake handling charges. 4. Aggrieved by the order of AO, assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings, the AR of the assessee appeared and argued the grounds and reiterated the submissions made before the AO. The CIT(A) after considering the submissions

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE , JAMSHEDPUR vs. M/S SURAJ SOLUTIONS PVT LTD , JAMSHDPUR

In the result, both appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the

ITA 184/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 132(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

47,26,890/- making addition of Rs.93,75,381/- on account of clinker rake handling charges. 4. Aggrieved by the order of AO, assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A). In the appellate proceedings, the AR of the assessee appeared and argued the grounds and reiterated the submissions made before the AO. The CIT(A) after considering the submissions