ITO, TDS,, RANCHI vs. M/S. CHINNAMASTIKA CEMENT & ISPAT LTD.,, RAMGARH

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

TDS liability in this case. 4. Ld. CIT(A) has erred in accepting the submission of the petitioner assessee in its entirely during the appeal proceedings without making any cross verification of the facts of the case as stated supra and without giving any further opportunity to the Assessing Officer/ Revenue to rebut the claim of the assessee

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR vs. BENKO TRADERS PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.436/Ran/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Acit, Cc, Jamshedpur…………….…….…............................……….……Appellant Vs. Benko Traders Pvt. Ltd....………...….…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent 119, 4Th Floor, Block D, White House, Park Stree, Wb – 700016. [Pan: Aabcb1888R] Appearances By: Shri Akshay Ringasia, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Khubchand T. Pandya, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : November 07, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : December 17, 2025 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Patna For The Assessment Year 2015–16 Dated 25.09.2024 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (The ‘Act’). 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income Under Section 139 Of The Act Declaring A Total Income As Nil. The Return Was Processed Under Section 143(1). Subsequently, The Case Was Selected For Scrutiny & An Assessment Under Section 143(3) Was Completed On 28.11.2017 Determining The Total Income At ₹9,88,28,406. Based On Information Received From The Investigation Wing, Mumbai, Relating To Alleged Use Of Stock Exchange Platform (Bse/Nse) For Generating Fictitious Long-Term/Short-Term Capital Gains Through Certain Scripts & Alleged Accommodation Entries, The Assessing Officer Recorded Reasons Under Section 147 Of The Act. A Notice Under Section 148 Was Issued The Assessee Filed Its Return Declaring The Same Income

89,300. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A), who deleted the additions observing as under: “Appellate findings: I have heard the rival submissions and perused the orders of the Ld.AO and the material available on record. In his written submission the Ld. AR stated that the Ld. AO has grossly erred in adding the profit

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LIMITED ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed and appeal by the assessee is partly allowed as well as cross-objection by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

89,176/- (AY 1996-97 to 2005-06) and restricting the same for C.O. No. 07/Ran/2018 AY: 2008-09 M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited preceding 8 years only by relying on the amendment made in this regard by Finance (No. 2), Bill 1996. 5. Aggrieved by the above order passed by the ld. AO, assessee preferred an appeal before

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LTD, DHANBAD

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed and appeal by the assessee is partly allowed as well as cross-objection by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

89,176/- (AY 1996-97 to 2005-06) and restricting the same for C.O. No. 07/Ran/2018 AY: 2008-09 M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited preceding 8 years only by relying on the amendment made in this regard by Finance (No. 2), Bill 1996. 5. Aggrieved by the above order passed by the ld. AO, assessee preferred an appeal before

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. SHRI VIJAY PRASAD, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue as well as cross-objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Bleassessment Year: 2012-13 Acit, Central Circle-1, Ranchi Shri Vijay Prasad Flat No. 202, Madhusudan Sir Vs Krishanapuri, Dimna Road Mango, Jamshedpur-831012. Pan: Ailpp 0228 L (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No.19/Ran/2021 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 35/Ran/2021) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Vijay Prasad Acit, Central Circle-1, Ranchi Flat No. 202, Madhusudan Sir Vs Krishanapuri, Dimna Road Mango, Jamshedpur-831012. Pan: Ailpp 0228 L (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 29.11.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 11.12.2023 O R D E R Per Sonjoy Sarma: Jm This Appeal Is Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A)-3, Patna Dated 09.03.2021 Against Same Impugned Order A Cross-Objection Also Filed By The Assessee Being C.O. No. 19/Ran/2021. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are The Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income For The A.Y. 2012-13 On 11.09.2012 Showing Total Income Of Rs. 14,32,834/-. The Case Of The Assessee Was Selected For Scrutiny Under Cass & The Assessment In The Case Of Assessee Was Completed U/S 143(3) Of The Act On 28.03.2014 Determining Total Income Of Rs.

89,846/-. 3. Aggrieved by the above order assessee went in appeal before the ld. CIT(A) where the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed. 4. Dissatisfied with the above order revenue is in appeal before this Tribunal. Although revenue has raised 6 grounds of appeal in present appeal. However, main grievance of revenue is relating to delete

ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

89,09,000\n13. The first issue is in regard to addition made on contractual expenses\nrelated to Kustore area (L.B.Singh). It was submitted by the Ld.AR that the\nissue was in regard to the contractual payments made to Shri LB Singh and\nhis brothers which has been disallowed by the AO on the ground that Shri\nLB Singh

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

89,09,000\n13. The first issue is in regard to addition made on contractual expenses\nrelated to Kustore area (L.B.Singh). It was submitted by the Ld.AR that the\nissue was in regard to the contractual payments made to Shri LB Singh and\nhis brothers which has been disallowed by the AO on the ground that Shri\nLB Singh

CCL,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI

89,91,861\n23,99,90,931\nDisputed\nTotal Rs.\n42,60,02,440\n33,40,83,502\n2,99,00,000\n29,31,00,000\n1,06,99,22,792\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/s CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nLease Rent/ Depreciation Forest Land\n1\n2\nLand & Crop Compensation

DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI vs. M/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD, RANCHI

89,91,861\n12 Prior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n23,99,90,931\n13 Repair expenses\n14 Stripping Activity Adjustment\n15 R & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\nExpense u/s 35E\n16\n17\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B\nTotal

DCIT CIR-1,, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

89,91,861\n13\nRepair expenses\n23,99,90,931\n14\nStripping Activity Adjustment\n15\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\n16\nExpense u/s 35E\n17\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B\nTotal Rs.\n42,60,02,440\n33,40,83,502\n2,99,00,000\n29,31,00,000\n1,06,99,22,792\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/s CENTRAL COALFIELDS

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

89,91,861\n23,99,90,931\nTotal Rs.\n42,60,02,440\n33,40,83,502\n2,99,00,000\n29,31,00,000\n1,06,99,22,792\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\n3\nM/s Central Coal Fields Ltd.\nM/s CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nAY 2016-17\nBy Assessee

DCIT CIRCLE-1 , RANCHI vs. CCL LTD , RANCHI

89,91,861\n13\nRepair expenses\n23,99,90,931\n14\nStripping Activity Adjustment\n15\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\nExpense u/s 35E\n16\n17\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B\nTotal Rs.\n42,60,02,440\n33,40,83,502\n2,99,00,000\n29,31,00,000\n1,06,99,22,792\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\n3\nM/s Central

CCL,RANCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1, RANCHI

89,91,861\nStripping Activity Adjustment\n23,99,90,931\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\nExpense u/s 35E\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B\nTotal Rs.\n42,60,02,440\n33,40,83,502\n2,99,00,000\n29,31,00,000\n1,06,99,22,792\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/s CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD

89,09,000\n13.\nThe first issue is in regard to addition made on contractual expenses\nrelated to Kustore area (L.B.Singh). It was submitted by the Ld.AR that the\nissue was in regard to the contractual payments made to Shri LB Singh and\nhis brothers which has been disallowed by the AO on the ground that Shri\nLB Singh

M/S. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1,, RANCHI

89,91,861\n23,99,90,931\nTotal Rs.\n42,60,02,440\n33,40,83,502\n2,99,00,000\n29,31,00,000\n1,06,99,22,792\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/s CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nAY 2016-17\n191/RAN/2019\nBy Assessee

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

89,91,861\nStripping Activity Adjustment\n23,99,90,931\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\nExpense u/s 35E\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B\nDisputed\nTotal Rs.\n42,60,02,440\n33,40,83,502\n2,99,00,000\n29,31,00,000\n1,06,99,22,792\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/s CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions

CCL,RNCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1 , RANCHI

89,91,861\nPrior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n23,99,90,931\nRepair expenses\nStripping Activity Adjustment\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\nExpense u/s 35E\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B\nDisputed\nDisputed\nDisputed\nDisputed\nDisputed\nTotal

CCL LTD ,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

89,91,861\n23,99,90,931\nDisputed\nTotal Rs.\n42,60,02,440\n33,40,83,502\n2,99,00,000\n29,31,00,000\n1,06,99,22,792\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/s CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\n3\nM/s Central Coal Fields Ltd.\nSI.\nHead\nΙ.Τ.Α. No.\nAY 2016-17\n191/RAN/2019