BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

34 results for “TDS”+ Section 57clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,600Mumbai1,537Bangalore877Chennai471Kolkata331Indore214Ahmedabad211Hyderabad175Chandigarh168Cochin161Karnataka153Jaipur137Pune105Lucknow56Rajkot54Raipur49Visakhapatnam48Surat36Cuttack34Ranchi34Jodhpur25Agra18Nagpur13Amritsar11Telangana11Guwahati11SC9Dehradun9Varanasi8Allahabad7Jabalpur7Patna6Panaji5Punjab & Haryana5J&K2Himachal Pradesh2Uttarakhand2Calcutta1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Depreciation31Disallowance31Section 14A28Section 35E26Section 234A26Addition to Income17Section 32(2)12Section 143(3)6Set Off of Losses3Carry Forward of Losses

ITO, TDS, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. M/S. CHHINAMASTIKA CEMENT & ISPAT PVT. LTD.,, RAMGARH

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 18/RAN/2022[16-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi27 May 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 133Section 133A

57,68,608.00 2017-18 6,84,08,367.00 4,24,21,613.00 2,59,86,754.00 Shri Dinesh Kumar Choudhary stated that while making payments to various transporters, no TDS has been deducted barring a few entity as these transporters were having less than ten vehicles/carriers, however, Shri Dinesh Kumar Choudhary could not produce any documents evidence/proof like bills

ITO, TDS,, RANCHI vs. M/S. CHINNAMASTIKA CEMENT & ISPAT LTD.,, RAMGARH

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 17/RAN/2022[15-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi

Showing 1–20 of 34 · Page 1 of 2

3
Section 1332
Section 133A2
27 May 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 133Section 133A

57,68,608.00 2017-18 6,84,08,367.00 4,24,21,613.00 2,59,86,754.00 Shri Dinesh Kumar Choudhary stated that while making payments to various transporters, no TDS has been deducted barring a few entity as these transporters were having less than ten vehicles/carriers, however, Shri Dinesh Kumar Choudhary could not produce any documents evidence/proof like bills

M/S MANIKARAN POWER LTD,RANCHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 471/RAN/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi08 Oct 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayit(Ss)A No. 01/Ran/2025 (Assessment Year: 2022-23) A.C.I.T., Manikaran Power Limited, Central Circle-2, Manikaran Tower, Kilburn Colony, Vs. Ranchi. P.O. Hinoo, Ranchi-834002 (Jharkhand) J.C.I.T. (In Situ), Pan No. Aaecm 4555 F Ranchi. Revenue/ Appellant Respondent/ Assessee Manikaran Power Limited, A.C.I.T., Manikaran Tower, Kilburn Colony, Central Circle-2, Vs. P.O. Hinoo, Ranchi-834002 Ranchi. (Jharkhand) Pan No. Aaecm 4555 F Revenue/ Appellant Respondent/ Assessee

57,00,000/- and ₹ 36,00,000/- representing the rents paid, the same was deleted by the ld. CIT(A) on the ground that the payments were made through agreements and recorded in the regular books of account and the P a g e 5 | 10 IT(SS)A 01/Ran/2025 & ITA 471/Ran/2025 JCIT Vs. Manikaran Power Ltd. recipients

ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

ITA 302/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

57,776,336.00\nB.O.I. A/c 202\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 0000110\n3,553.00\n115,745,225.00\nB.O.I. A/c 0000114\n10.350.00\nB.0.1. A/c 000035\n11,486.00\nSundry Creditors\n3.0.1. A/c 200\n10,150.00\nAs per List Attached\n45075456.00\nB.O.I. A/c 203\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 145\n4,850.00\nOutstanding Liabilities\nB.0.1. A/c 59019\n14,006 00\nLiabilities

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

ITA 300/RAN/2017[09-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

57,776,336.00\nB.O.I. A/c 029\n2,319.00\nB.O.I. A/c 036\n19,012.00\nB.Ο.Ι. A/c 201\n10,150.00\n115,745,225.00\nB.O.I. A/c 202\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 0000110\n3,553.00\nB.O.I. A/c 0000114\n10.350.00\nSundry Creditors\nB.0.1. A/c 000035\n11,486.00\nAs per List Attached\n45075456.00\n3.0.1. A/c 200\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 203\n10,150.00\nB.O.I

CCL,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI

ITA 165/RAN/2017[07-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

57,00,000\n47,00,000\n4,18,00,000\n33,11,00,000\n14,89,91,861\n23,99,90,931\nDisputed\nTotal Rs.\n42,60,02,440\n33,40,83,502\n2,99,00,000\n29,31,00,000\n1,06,99,22,792\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/s CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions

DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI vs. M/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD, RANCHI

ITA 178/RAN/2017[12-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

57,00,000\nDisallowance of Prior Period Expenses\n47,00,000\n4,18,00,000\n33,11,00,000\n1 Prior Period Expenses as per Note 32 of\nAnnual Report\n14,89,91,861\n12 Prior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n23,99,90,931\n13 Repair expenses\n14 Stripping Activity Adjustment

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

ITA 173/RAN/2017[07-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

57,00,000\n47,00,000\n4,18,00,000\n33,11,00,000\n14,89,91,861\n23,99,90,931\nTotal Rs.\n42,60,02,440\n33,40,83,502\n2,99,00,000\n29,31,00,000\n1,06,99,22,792\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\n3\nM/s Central Coal Fields Ltd.\nM/s CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee

DCIT CIR-1,, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

ITA 174/RAN/2017[08-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

57,00,000\n10\nDisallowance of Prior Period Expenses\n47,00,000\n4,18,00,000\n11\nPrior Period Expenses as per Note 32 of\nAnnual Report\n33,11,00,000\n12\nPrior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n14,89,91,861\n13\nRepair expenses\n23,99,90,931\n14\nStripping Activity Adjustment

DCIT CIRCLE-1 , RANCHI vs. CCL LTD , RANCHI

ITA 37/RAN/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

57,00,000\n10\nDisallowance of Prior Period Expenses\n47,00,000\n4,18,00,000\n11\nPrior Period Expenses as per Note 32 of\nAnnual Report\n33,11,00,000\n12\nPrior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n14,89,91,861\n13\nRepair expenses\n23,99,90,931\n14\nStripping Activity Adjustment

CCL,RANCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1, RANCHI

ITA 166/RAN/2017[08-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

57,00,000\nPrior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n47,00,000\n4,18,00,000\n33,11,00,000\nRepair expenses\n14,89,91,861\nStripping Activity Adjustment\n23,99,90,931\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\nExpense u/s 35E\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B\nTotal

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD

ITA 293/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

57,776,336.00\nB.O.I. A/c 029\n2,319.00\nB.O.I. A/c 036\n19,012.00\nB.Ο.Ι. A/c 201\n10,150.00\n115,745,225.00\nB.O.I. A/c 202\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 0000110\n3,553.00\nB.O.I. A/c 0000114\n10.350.00\nSundry Creditors\nB.0.1. A/c 000035\n11,486.00\nAs per List Attached\n45075456.00\n3.0.1. A/c 200\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 203\n10,150.00\nOutstanding

M/S. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1,, RANCHI

ITA 74/RAN/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026AY 2020-21
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

57,00,000\n47,00,000\n4,18,00,000\n33,11,00,000\n14,89,91,861\n23,99,90,931\nTotal Rs.\n42,60,02,440\n33,40,83,502\n2,99,00,000\n29,31,00,000\n1,06,99,22,792\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/s CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

ITA 176/RAN/2017[10-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

57,00,000\nPrior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n47,00,000\n4,18,00,000\n33,11,00,000\nRepair expenses\n14,89,91,861\nStripping Activity Adjustment\n23,99,90,931\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\nExpense u/s 35E\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B\nDisputed\nTotal

CCL LTD ,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

ITA 32/RAN/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

57,00,000\n47,00,000\n4,18,00,000\n33,11,00,000\n14,89,91,861\n23,99,90,931\nDisputed\nTotal Rs.\n42,60,02,440\n33,40,83,502\n2,99,00,000\n29,31,00,000\n1,06,99,22,792\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/s CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions

CCL,RNCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1 , RANCHI

ITA 167/RAN/2017[09-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

57,00,000\nDisallowance of Prior Period Expenses\n47,00,000\n4,18,00,000\n33,11,00,000\nPrior Period Expenses as per Note 32 of\nAnnual Report\n14,89,91,861\nPrior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n23,99,90,931\nRepair expenses\nStripping Activity Adjustment\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment

CCL,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR01 , RANCHI

ITA 168/RAN/2017[10-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

57,00,000\n47,00,000\n4,18,00,000\n33,11,00,000\n14,89,91,861\n23,99,90,931\n42,60,02,440\n33,40,83,502\n2,99,00,000\n29,31,00,000\n1,06,99,22,792\nM/s CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\n3\nM/s Central Coal Fields Ltd.\nSI.\nHead

CCL ,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI

ITA 266/RAN/2017[13-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026
Section 14ASection 234ASection 35E

57,00,000\n4,18,00,000\n33,11,00,000\n14,89,91,861\n23,99,90,931\nTotal Rs.\n42,60,02,440\n33,40,83,502\n2,99,00,000\n29,31,00,000\n1,06,99,22,792\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\nM/s CENTRAL COALFIELDS Ltd.\nAssessee's Appeals-disputed Additions\nSI.\nHead

CCL ,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 170/RAN/2017[12-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.164,165,166,167,168,169,170&266/Ran/2017 (A.Y :2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.32/Ran/2018 (Ay : 2014-2015) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.190 & 191/Ran/2019 (Ay:2015-16 & 2016-17) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.119, 120, 74/Ran/2024 (Ay: 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) M/S Central Coalfields Limited, Vs. Addl.Cit, Range-1, Ranchi Darbhanga House, Office Of Gm Finance-A, Opp. Governor House Ranchi-834001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aaacc 7476 R & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.172,173,174,175,176,177,178 & 235/Ran/2017 (A.Y :2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.37/Ran/2018 (Ay : 2014-2015) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.174 & 175/Ran/2019 (Ay:2015-16 & 2016-17) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.47, 203, 204, 128/Ran/2024 (Ay: 2017-2018, 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Addl.Cit, Range-1, Ranchi Vs. M/S Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, Office Of Gm Finance-A, Opp. Governor House Ranchi-834001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aaacc 7476 R (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri M.K.Chowdhary & Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocates राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rajib Jain, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 05/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 05/01/2026 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), Ranchi/Nfac, Delhi, Dated 12.04.2017, 26.04.2017, 25.04.2027, 28.04.2017, 08.11.2017

For Appellant: Shri M.K.ChowdharyFor Respondent: Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR

TDS is liable to be deducted on the said payment. Thus, this issue is in held in favour of the assessee. 20. Next issue is in regard to provisions towards NCWA VIII. It was the submission that this is an interim relief on account of the pay revision. It was the submission that in April 2008 the holding company being

DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI vs. M/S CCL , RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 172/RAN/2017[06-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.164,165,166,167,168,169,170&266/Ran/2017 (A.Y :2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.32/Ran/2018 (Ay : 2014-2015) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.190 & 191/Ran/2019 (Ay:2015-16 & 2016-17) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.119, 120, 74/Ran/2024 (Ay: 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) M/S Central Coalfields Limited, Vs. Addl.Cit, Range-1, Ranchi Darbhanga House, Office Of Gm Finance-A, Opp. Governor House Ranchi-834001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aaacc 7476 R & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.172,173,174,175,176,177,178 & 235/Ran/2017 (A.Y :2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.37/Ran/2018 (Ay : 2014-2015) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.174 & 175/Ran/2019 (Ay:2015-16 & 2016-17) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.47, 203, 204, 128/Ran/2024 (Ay: 2017-2018, 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Addl.Cit, Range-1, Ranchi Vs. M/S Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, Office Of Gm Finance-A, Opp. Governor House Ranchi-834001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aaacc 7476 R (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri M.K.Chowdhary & Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocates राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rajib Jain, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 05/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 05/01/2026 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), Ranchi/Nfac, Delhi, Dated 12.04.2017, 26.04.2017, 25.04.2027, 28.04.2017, 08.11.2017

For Appellant: Shri M.K.ChowdharyFor Respondent: Shri Rajib Jain, CIT-DR

TDS is liable to be deducted on the said payment. Thus, this issue is in held in favour of the assessee. 20. Next issue is in regard to provisions towards NCWA VIII. It was the submission that this is an interim relief on account of the pay revision. It was the submission that in April 2008 the holding company being