M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LIMITED ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed and appeal by the assessee is partly allowed as well as cross-objection by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

48,000/- on the grounds that TDS was not deducted in violation of provision of section 40(a)(ia). The disallowance

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LTD, DHANBAD

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed and appeal by the assessee is partly allowed as well as cross-objection by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

48,000/- on the grounds that TDS was not deducted in violation of provision of section 40(a)(ia). The disallowance

RAM KUMAR,JAMSHEDPUR vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No. 189/Ran/2025 Assessment Year: 2018-2019 Ram Kumar,…………………………………………..Appellant C/O. Ram Bilash Prasad Gupta, Gayatri Niwas, Ekta Colony, Majhi Tola, Adityapur, Jamshedpur-831013, Jharkhand [Pan:Anspk0996Q] -Vs.- Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,....Respondent Central Circle, Office Road, Jamshedpur-831001, Jharkhand Appearances By: Shri Akshay Ringasia, A.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Shri Khubchand T. Pandya, Sr. D.R., Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue Date Of Concluding The Hearing: July 21, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order: August 25, 2025 O R D E R

48,610/- on 04.10.2018. A survey operation was conducted in the case of assessee under section 133A of the Income Tax Act by the ITO, Ward-3(3), Jamshedpur in the business premises on 28.02.2018. During the course of survey proceedings, documents vide Identification Marks RK-01 to RK-04 were impounded. The case was selected for compulsory scrutiny

M/S P.K.UPADHYAY vs. ITO WARD-3(5), PALAMAU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Manish Borad

48,688/- Total Rs.34,13,698/- According to the ld. Assessing Officer, the assessee failed to deduct TDS under section

ACIT, EXEMPTION CIRCLE, RANCHI vs. M/S. R.V.S. EDUCATIONAL TRUST, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am (Through : Hybrid Mode) आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.24/Ran/2020 (Ǔ""ȡ[""""[/ A.Y. :2016-2017) Acit, Exemption Circle, Ranchi Vs. M/S Rvs Educational Trust, C/O Binda Apartments (India) Private Limited, Siroman Nagar, Dimna Road, Mango, Jamshedpur-831012 ̾Ĉĭēıĕĸù Ĭĝń/Pan No. : Aaatr4456M (\ "Ȣ"ȡ"ȸ/Appellant) (Ĥ×""ȸ/ Respondent) ..

48,23,302/- R.V.S. International School Rs.1,15,70,373/- R.V.S. Academy Rs. 75,37,646/- Total Rs.4,39,31,321/- (b) Ld. Assessing officer has disallowed capital expenditure on the single reason that no details have been furnished before her but the facts are different...... Assesse trust has submitted the details of addition in fixed assets at the time

CCL,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI

48,51,116\n35,29,25,558\n10,09,00,000\n21,99,00,000\n36,08,20,000\n39,21,891\n7,54,00,000\nTotal Rs.\n1,75,11,86,674\n1,10,13,17,344 82,28,00,000 58,07,20,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\n13,13,47,37,752\n3. The first issue

DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI vs. M/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD, RANCHI

48,51,116\n35,29,25,558\n10,09,00,000\n21,99,00,000\n36,08,20,000\n12 Prior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n13 Repair expenses\n14 Stripping Activity Adjustment\n15 R & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\n16 Expense u/s 35E\n17 Int. u/s 234A / 234B

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

48,51,116\n35,29,25,558\n10,09,00,000\n21,99,00,000\n36,08,20,000\n39,21,891\n7,54,00,000\nTotal Rs.\n1,75,11,86,674\n1,10,13,17,344 82,28,00,000 58,07,20,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\n13,13,47,37,752\n3.\nThe first issue

DCIT CIR-1,, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

48,51,116\n12\nPrior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n35,29,25,558\n13\nRepair expenses\n14\nStripping Activity Adjustment\n15\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\n16\nExpense u/s 35E\n17\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B

DCIT CIRCLE-1 , RANCHI vs. CCL LTD , RANCHI

48,51,116\n12\nPrior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n35,29,25,558\n13\nRepair expenses\n14\nStripping Activity Adjustment\n10,09,00,000\n21,99,00,000\n15\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\n36,08,20,000\n16\nExpense u/s 35E\n39,21,891\n7,54,00,000\n17\nInt

CCL,RANCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1, RANCHI

48,51,116\nPrior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n35,29,25,558\n10,09,00,000\n21,99,00,000\nRepair expenses\n36,08,20,000\nStripping Activity Adjustment\n39,21,891\n7,54,00,000\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\nExpense u/s 35E\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B\nTotal

M/S. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1,, RANCHI

48,51,116\n35,29,25,558\n10,09,00,000\n21,99,00,000\n36,08,20,000\n39,21,891\n7,54,00,000\nTotal Rs.\n1,75,11,86,674\n1,10,13,17,344\n82,28,00,000\n58,07,20,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\n13,13,47,37,752\n3. The first issue

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

48,51,116\n35,29,25,558\n10,09,00,000\n36,08,20,000\nPrior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\nRepair expenses\nStripping Activity Adjustment\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\nExpense u/s 35E\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B\n7,54,00,000\nTotal

CCL,RNCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1 , RANCHI

48,51,116\nPrior Period Expenses as per Note 32 of\nAnnual Report\n35,29,25,558\n10,09,00,000\n21,99,00,000\nPrior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n36,08,20,000\nRepair expenses\nStripping Activity Adjustment\nR & D Expenses and Actuary Payment\nExpense u/s 35E\nInt. u/s 234A / 234B

CCL LTD ,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

48,51,116\n35,29,25,558\n99,64,95,453\n74,74,00,000\n10,09,00,000\n21,99,00,000\n36,08,20,000\n39,21,891\n7,54,00,000\nTotal Rs.\n1,75,11,86,674\n1,10,13,17,344 82,28,00,000 58,07,20,000\nGrand total Disputes

CCL,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR01 , RANCHI

48,51,116\n35,29,25,558\n74,74,00,000\n10,09,00,000\n21,99,00,000\n36,08,20,000\n39,21,891\n7,54,00,000\n1,75,11,86,674\n1,10,13,17,344 82,28,00,000 58,07,20,000\n13,13,47,37,752\n3.\nThe first issue is with regard

CCL ,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI

48,51,116\n35,29,25,558\n10,09,00,000\n36,08,20,000\n39,21,891\n7,54,00,000\nTotal Rs.\n1,75,11,86,674\n1,10,13,17,344\n82,28,00,000\n58,07,20,000\nGrand total Disputes Rs.\n13,13,47,37,752\n3.\nThe first issue is with regard to disallowance

CCL,RNACHI vs. ADDITIONAL CIT ,RG -1 , RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri George Mathan, Jm & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.164,165,166,167,168,169,170&266/Ran/2017 (A.Y :2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.32/Ran/2018 (Ay : 2014-2015) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.190 & 191/Ran/2019 (Ay:2015-16 & 2016-17) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.119, 120, 74/Ran/2024 (Ay: 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) M/S Central Coalfields Limited, Vs. Addl.Cit, Range-1, Ranchi Darbhanga House, Office Of Gm Finance-A, Opp. Governor House Ranchi-834001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aaacc 7476 R & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.172,173,174,175,176,177,178 & 235/Ran/2017 (A.Y :2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.37/Ran/2018 (Ay : 2014-2015) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.174 & 175/Ran/2019 (Ay:2015-16 & 2016-17) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.47, 203, 204, 128/Ran/2024 (Ay: 2017-2018, 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21) Addl.Cit, Range-1, Ranchi Vs. M/S Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, Office Of Gm Finance-A, Opp. Governor House Ranchi-834001 स्थायी लेखा सं./Pan No. : Aaacc 7476 R (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) निर्ाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri M.K.Chowdhary & Shri Devesh Poddar, Advocates राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rajib Jain, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 05/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 05/01/2026 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These Are The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), Ranchi/Nfac, Delhi, Dated 12.04.2017, 26.04.2017, 25.04.2027, 28.04.2017, 08.11.2017

TDS is liable to be deducted on the said payment. Thus, this issue is in held in favour of the assessee. 20. Next issue is in regard to provisions towards NCWA VIII. It was the submission that this is an interim relief on account of the pay revision. It was the submission that in April 2008 the holding company being