DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI vs. M/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD, RANCHI

36,000\nLand & Crop Compensation\n89,82,07,000\n74,48,000\nCredit of Dividend Distribution Tax\n40,87,00,000\nRehabilitation fund Contribution Expenses\n23,17,26,000\n23,16,60,000\n25,20,60,000\n26,19,00,000\nIICM Charges\n2,20,00,000\n2,16,22,000\n2,35,40,000\nProvisions Toward NCWA VIII

SHRI NAVNEET MODI,RANCHI vs. DCIT,CIRCLE-2, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. No.53/Ran/2019 Assessment Year: 2013-14 Shri Navneet Modi….…..…………..…...…......................……...…..….. Appellant Modi House, Kanke Dam Side Road, Kanke, Ranchi-834008. [Pan: Actpm1511F] Vs. Dcit, Circle-2, Ranchi.………………………….……….…………….. Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 28, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 28, 2023 Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 03.10.2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Ranchi [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

36,234/- and assessed the total income by the assessee at Rs.31,65,966/- and initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. 5. During the penalty proceedings, the ld counsel for the assessee has submitted that certain disallowances were made on ad hoc basis and in that case, there was neither concealment of income nor furnishing

ACIT CIR-2(1), JSR vs. JUSCO LTD , JSR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Act. The AO noted that Form no. 10CCB is mandatory along with return or during the assessment proceedings but the assessee company has not ITA Nos. 8 & 9/Ran/2018 AY: 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/s Jamshedpur Utilities & Services Company Ltd. submitted the Form no. 10CCB. Accordingly the counsel of the assessee was asked to explain

ACIT CIR-2(1), JSR vs. JUSCO LTD , JSR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Act. The AO noted that Form no. 10CCB is mandatory along with return or during the assessment proceedings but the assessee company has not ITA Nos. 8 & 9/Ran/2018 AY: 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/s Jamshedpur Utilities & Services Company Ltd. submitted the Form no. 10CCB. Accordingly the counsel of the assessee was asked to explain

JAMSHEDPUR UTILITIES AND SERVICES COMPANY LTD,JSR vs. ACIT CIR-2, JSR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Act. The AO noted that Form no. 10CCB is mandatory along with return or during the assessment proceedings but the assessee company has not ITA Nos. 8 & 9/Ran/2018 AY: 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/s Jamshedpur Utilities & Services Company Ltd. submitted the Form no. 10CCB. Accordingly the counsel of the assessee was asked to explain

JUSCO LTD ,JSR vs. DCIT CIR-2 , JSR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee are partly allowed and the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Act. The AO noted that Form no. 10CCB is mandatory along with return or during the assessment proceedings but the assessee company has not ITA Nos. 8 & 9/Ran/2018 AY: 2013-14 & 2014-15 M/s Jamshedpur Utilities & Services Company Ltd. submitted the Form no. 10CCB. Accordingly the counsel of the assessee was asked to explain

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

section 132(1)\nof the Act was carried out in the case of Sri Lal Babu Singh on November 23,\n2011. In the course of search operations, cash in the form of deposits in the bank\naccounts of Rs. 75.78 crs and Fixed Deposits of Rs. 17.40 crs were found and\nseized.\nCHANDRAHAT\n11/3/15\nertified to be True Bopy Post

DCIT CIRCLE-1 , RANCHI vs. CCL LTD , RANCHI

Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Business expenditure\nAllowability of (Welfare expenses of employees) - Assessee-\ncompany was engaged in business of coal mining It claimed\nexpenses incurred towards welfare of of its employees like canteen,\nhostels, etc. business expenditure Commissioner disallowed same\non ground that said expenditures had not been properly explained\nand that assessee

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

36,000\n40,87,00,000\n23,17,26,000\n23,16,60,000\n25,20,60,000\n26,19,00,000\n2,20,00,000\n2,13,49,00,000\n19,85,73,000\n2,16,22,000\n2,35,40,000\n1,21,53,000\nDisallowance of Prior Period Expenses\nPrior Period Expenses as per Note

DCIT CIR-1,, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

36,000\nLand & Crop Compensation\n89,82,07,000\n74,48,000\nCredit of Dividend Distribution Tax\n40,87,00,000\nRehabilitation fund Contribution Expenses\n23,17,26,000\n23,16,60,000\n25,20,60,000\n26,19,00,000\nIICM Charges\n2,20,00,000\n2,16,22,000\n2,35,40,000\nProvisions Toward NCWA VIII

CCL,RANCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1, RANCHI

36,000\nLand & Crop Compensation\n89,82,07,000\n74,48,000\nCredit of Dividend Distribution Tax\n40,87,00,000\nRehabilitation fund Contribution Expenses\n23,17,26,000\n23,16,60,000\n25,20,60,000\n26,19,00,000\nIICM Charges\n2,20,00,000\n2,35,40,000\nProvisions Toward NCWA VIII

ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

36)\n39\nGOVERNMENT OF INDIA\nDIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (INV.)\nCENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING (3RD FLOOR)\nBIR CHAND PATEL MARG, PATNA-800 001\n*************************\nF. No. DGIT(Inv.)/Pat/S1-96/L.B.S./2013-14/\n**********\nJanuary 9th 2014\nTo\nThe Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-I\nPatna.\nSub: Illegal payments by M/s BCCL, Dhanbad, to contractors -reg.\nRef:-D.O. F. No. DGIT(Inv)/Pat/S1-96/L.B.S

M/S. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1,, RANCHI

36,000\n23,16,60,000\n25,20,60,000\n26,19,00,000\n2,16,22,000\n2,35,40,000\n1,21,53,000\nDisallowance of Prior Period Expenses\n1 Prior Period Expenses as per Note 32 of\nAnnual Report\n12 Prior period exp. not exceeding Rs. 10 Lacs,\non estimate @ 50%- enhancement\n13 Repair expenses\n14 Stripping

CCL ,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIR-1 , RANCHI

Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Business expenditure\nAllowability of (Welfare expenses of employees) Assessee-\ncompany was engaged in business of coal mining It claimed\nexpenses incurred towards welfare of of its employees like canteen,\nhostels, etc. business expenditure Commissioner disallowed same\non ground that said expenditures had not been properly explained\nand that assessee

CCL,RNCHI vs. ACIT CIR-1 , RANCHI

36,000\nLand & Crop Compensation\n89,82,07,000\n74,48,000\nCredit of Dividend Distribution Tax\n40,87,00,000\nRehabilitation fund Contribution Expenses\n23,17,26,000\n23,16,60,000\n25,20,60,000\n26,19,00,000\nIICM Charges\n2,20,00,000\n2,13,49,00,000\n2,35,40,000\nProvisions Toward NCWA VIII

DCIT CIR-1, RANCHI vs. CCL, RANCHI

36,000\nLand & Crop Compensation\n89,82,07,000\n74,48,000\nCredit of Dividend Distribution Tax\n40,87,00,000\nRehabilitation fund Contribution Expenses\n23,17,26,000\n23,16,60,000\n25,20,60,000\n26,19,00,000\nIICM Charges\n2,20,00,000\n2,35,40,000\nProvisions Toward NCWA VIII

CCL LTD ,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

36,000\n40,87,00,000\n23,17,26,000\n23,16,60,000\n25,20,60,000\n26,19,00,000\n2,20,00,000\n2,13,49,00,000\n19,85,73,000\n2,16,22,000\n2,35,40,000\n1,21,53,000\nDisallowance of Prior Period Expenses\n1 Prior Period Expenses as per Note

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD

36,907/-, K N Singh has disclosed Cheque in Hand of Rs. 65,09,508/- and Cash at Bank of Rs. 2,12,569/-.\nHowever, Information is not available in case of Bharat Singh.\nOn analysis of the above-mentioned Cheque in Hand and Cash at Bank, it clearly shows that huge\namounts in the Balance Sheet