BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 32(1)(ii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,786Mumbai1,686Bangalore948Chennai497Kolkata340Hyderabad254Indore196Ahmedabad180Karnataka176Cochin158Chandigarh152Jaipur139Raipur99Pune96Nagpur62Visakhapatnam58Lucknow50Surat47Rajkot42Cuttack42Guwahati21Amritsar18Patna18Dehradun16Telangana15SC12Kerala9Agra8Jodhpur6Varanasi5Ranchi5Uttarakhand2Jabalpur2Allahabad2Himachal Pradesh1Panaji1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 32(2)14Section 143(3)6Depreciation5Addition to Income5Set Off of Losses5Carry Forward of Losses5Section 14A3Disallowance3Section 31(1)2Section 32(1)

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

ITA 300/RAN/2017[09-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

32,000/- under Rule\n8D(2)(iii) of the Rules.\n8. Ld. CIT(A) in the appellate proceedings recorded the finding that\nassessee's own interest free funds were sufficient to cover\ninvestment made in the securities. Ld. CIT(A) noted that the equity\nfund of the assessee was Rs. 4,657 Cr whereas average\ninvestments were only

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LIMITED ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed and appeal by the assessee is partly allowed as well as cross-objection by the assessee is allowed

ITA 290/RAN/2017[08-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi31 Mar 2023

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

2
Business Income2
Section 31(1)Section 32(1)Section 32(2)

32(2) as amended by Finance Act, 2001 and were available for carry forward and set off against the profits and gains of subsequent years without any limit whatsoever.” 8. In the light of the judicial precedents on the issue especially that of the Hon’ble Gujarat High court in the case of General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. (supra

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LTD, DHANBAD

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed and appeal by the assessee is partly allowed as well as cross-objection by the assessee is allowed

ITA 298/RAN/2017[08-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi31 Mar 2023

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 31(1)Section 32(1)Section 32(2)

32(2) as amended by Finance Act, 2001 and were available for carry forward and set off against the profits and gains of subsequent years without any limit whatsoever.” 8. In the light of the judicial precedents on the issue especially that of the Hon’ble Gujarat High court in the case of General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. (supra

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD

ITA 293/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

32,000/- under Rule\n8D(2)(iii) of the Rules.\n8. Ld. CIT(A) in the appellate proceedings recorded the finding that\nassessee's own interest free funds were sufficient to cover\ninvestment made in the securities. Ld. CIT(A) noted that the equity\nfund of the assessee was Rs. 4,657 Cr whereas average\ninvestments were only

ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

ITA 302/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

32,000/- under Rule\n8D(2)(iii) of the Rules.\n8. Ld. CIT(A) in the appellate proceedings recorded the finding that\nassessee's own interest free funds were sufficient to cover\ninvestment made in the securities. Ld. CIT(A) noted that the equity\nfund of the assessee was Rs. 4,657 Cr whereas average\ninvestments were only