BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 271C(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi240Mumbai162Bangalore99Kolkata58Karnataka47Raipur42Jaipur31Cochin28Ahmedabad23Indore15Chandigarh14Jodhpur12Nagpur11Lucknow10Chennai9Hyderabad8Telangana7Visakhapatnam7Surat6Agra5Jabalpur5Panaji5Pune3Ranchi3SC3Dehradun3Orissa2Rajkot2Varanasi1Kerala1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 271C24Section 194A6Section 2016Section 403Section 273B3Deduction3Penalty3TDS3Disallowance3Limitation/Time-bar

M/S. BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED,DHANBAD vs. JT. CIT, TDS,, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 75/RAN/2024[08-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 194ASection 201Section 271CSection 273BSection 40

1) of the Act. Thus, it cannot be considered as time barred. The ld. CIT(A) also held or imposition of penalty under Section 271C of the Act. The ld. CIT(A), accordingly, confirmed the order of Assessing Officer who imposed penalty under Section 271C of the Act. 4. Aggrieved by the order of ld. CIT(A), the assessee company

M/S. BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED,,DHANBAD vs. JCIT, TDS CIRCLE,, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

3
ITA 76/RAN/2024[09-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 194ASection 201Section 271CSection 273BSection 40

1) of the Act. Thus, it cannot be considered as time barred. The ld. CIT(A) also held or imposition of penalty under Section 271C of the Act. The ld. CIT(A), accordingly, confirmed the order of Assessing Officer who imposed penalty under Section 271C of the Act. 4. Aggrieved by the order of ld. CIT(A), the assessee company

M/S. BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED,DHANBAD vs. JCIT TDS, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 77/RAN/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Apr 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 194ASection 201Section 271CSection 273BSection 40

1) of the Act. Thus, it cannot be considered as time barred. The ld. CIT(A) also held or imposition of penalty under Section 271C of the Act. The ld. CIT(A), accordingly, confirmed the order of Assessing Officer who imposed penalty under Section 271C of the Act. 4. Aggrieved by the order of ld. CIT(A), the assessee company