BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 220clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi577Patna469Mumbai386Bangalore143Pune125Hyderabad97Karnataka91Chennai85Jaipur52Visakhapatnam48Kolkata45Raipur33Lucknow32Chandigarh31Ahmedabad29Indore27Cochin21Nagpur17Kerala8Rajkot8Ranchi7Agra4Jodhpur4Amritsar3Surat3Dehradun3Cuttack2SC2Telangana1Calcutta1Rajasthan1Varanasi1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 200A28Section 234E20Section 32(2)12Section 143(3)6Addition to Income5Deduction4TDS4Section 14A3Depreciation3Disallowance

ITO, TDS, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. M/S. CHHINAMASTIKA CEMENT & ISPAT PVT. LTD.,, RAMGARH

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 18/RAN/2022[16-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi27 May 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 133Section 133A

220(1) and ending with the date on which the amount is paid. This shows that the concept of continuing default is in-built in the section. Similarly, in section 221(1) there is in terms a reference to a continuing default and the section empowers the Assessing Officer to levy penalty from time to time, so, however, that

ITO, TDS,, RANCHI vs. M/S. CHINNAMASTIKA CEMENT & ISPAT LTD.,, RAMGARH

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 17/RAN/2022[15-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi27 May 2025
3
Set Off of Losses3
Carry Forward of Losses3

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 133Section 133A

220(1) and ending with the date on which the amount is paid. This shows that the concept of continuing default is in-built in the section. Similarly, in section 221(1) there is in terms a reference to a continuing default and the section empowers the Assessing Officer to levy penalty from time to time, so, however, that

SRI SITA RAM RAI,DHANBAD vs. ITO, DHANBAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 13/RAN/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi28 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. Nos.13&14/Ran/2022 Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15 Sri Sita Ram Rai……..….…..…………..…...…......................……...…..….. Appellant 1, New Karmik Nagar, Ism Saraidhella, Dhanbad, Jharkhand - 826004. [Pan: Afipr2324B] Vs. Ito, Tds Ward-Dhanbad………………………….……….…………….. Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 01, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 28, 2023 Order Per Sanjay Garg: Both The Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Dated 15.03.2022 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). The Assessee In Both The Appeals Has Agitated The Levy Of Late Filing Fees U/S 234E Of The Act Along With Interest Thereupon Levied U/S 220(2) Of The Act. Since, Common Issues Are Involved In All The Appeals, Hence These Have Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order. The Appeal In Ita No.13/Ran/2022 For Assessment Year 2013-14 Is Taken As Lead Case For The Purpose Of Narration Of Facts. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Deducted Tax At Source (Tds) In Respect Of Certain Payments. As Per The Provisions Of 1

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234ESection 250

220(2) of the Act. Since, common issues are involved in all the appeals, hence these have heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The appeal in ITA No.13/Ran/2022 for assessment year 2013-14 is taken as lead case for the purpose of narration of facts. 2. The brief facts of the case are that

SRI SITA RAM RAI,DHANBAD vs. ITO TDS WARD, DHANBAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 14/RAN/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi28 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rajesh Kumari.T.A. Nos.13&14/Ran/2022 Assessment Years: 2013-14 & 2014-15 Sri Sita Ram Rai……..….…..…………..…...…......................……...…..….. Appellant 1, New Karmik Nagar, Ism Saraidhella, Dhanbad, Jharkhand - 826004. [Pan: Afipr2324B] Vs. Ito, Tds Ward-Dhanbad………………………….……….…………….. Respondent Appearances By: Shri Devesh Poddar, Adv., Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 01, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : April 28, 2023 Order Per Sanjay Garg: Both The Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Separate Orders Dated 15.03.2022 Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre [Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). The Assessee In Both The Appeals Has Agitated The Levy Of Late Filing Fees U/S 234E Of The Act Along With Interest Thereupon Levied U/S 220(2) Of The Act. Since, Common Issues Are Involved In All The Appeals, Hence These Have Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order. The Appeal In Ita No.13/Ran/2022 For Assessment Year 2013-14 Is Taken As Lead Case For The Purpose Of Narration Of Facts. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Deducted Tax At Source (Tds) In Respect Of Certain Payments. As Per The Provisions Of 1

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 220(2)Section 234ESection 250

220(2) of the Act. Since, common issues are involved in all the appeals, hence these have heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. The appeal in ITA No.13/Ran/2022 for assessment year 2013-14 is taken as lead case for the purpose of narration of facts. 2. The brief facts of the case are that

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

ITA 300/RAN/2017[09-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

220,508.00\nB.O.I. A/c 00001\n6,702.00\nB.O.I. A/c 204\n10,150.00\nB.C.I. A/c 209\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 207\n10,150.00\nOutstandi: Liabilities\nB.O.I. A/c 206\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 57782\n11,677.00\nLiabilities 'or Exp.\n61,000.00\nB.O.I. A/c 033\n1,086.00\nC.B.I.(CA) 39183\n13,397.00\nC.B.I.(CA) 23208\n12,396.00\nC.B.I

ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

ITA 302/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

220,508.00\nB.O.I. A/c 00001\n6,702.00\nB.O.I. A/c 204\n10,150.00\nB.C.I. A/c 209\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 207\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 206\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 57782\n11,677.00\nOutstandi: Liabilities\nB.O.I. A/c 033\n1,086.00\nLiabilities 'or Exp.\n61,000.00\nC.B.I.(CA) 39183\n13,397.00\nC.B.I.(CA) 23208\n12,396.00\nC.B.I

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD

ITA 293/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

220,508.00\nU.C.C. Bank A/c 20188\n3,149,118.00\nB.O.I. A/c 00001\n6,702.00\nOutstandi: Liabilities\nB.O.I. A/c 204\n10,150.00\nB.C.I. A/c 209\n10,150.00\nLiabilities 'or Exp.\n61,000.00\nB.O.I. A/c 207\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 206\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 57782\n11,677.00\n1\nB.O.I. A/c 033\n1,086.00\nC.B.I.(CA) 39183\n13,397.00\nC.B.I