BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “TDS”+ Section 201(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,585Delhi1,545Bangalore1,107Chennai652Kolkata465Karnataka256Indore241Pune173Jaipur164Raipur153Nagpur145Hyderabad144Ahmedabad141Cochin99Chandigarh62Surat54Jodhpur45Lucknow43Rajkot42Jabalpur42Panaji36Visakhapatnam29Telangana27Kerala26Dehradun24Cuttack24Agra18Amritsar17Patna17SC13Guwahati9Ranchi9Varanasi8Himachal Pradesh6Allahabad4Orissa3Rajasthan3J&K1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 271C24Section 4015Section 20113Section 32(2)12Section 143(3)10Disallowance7Section 194A6Deduction6TDS6Addition to Income

ITO, TDS, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. M/S. CHHINAMASTIKA CEMENT & ISPAT PVT. LTD.,, RAMGARH

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 18/RAN/2022[16-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi27 May 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 133Section 133A

Section 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act by holding that "Admittedly, in this case despite making contrary observation, the ITO/TDS has accepted the transportation payment as genuine that is why he has computed the TDS liability on those payments u/s 201(1) and interest u/s 201(1A). Therefore, it is not in dispute that the transportation payments has been

ITO, TDS,, RANCHI vs. M/S. CHINNAMASTIKA CEMENT & ISPAT LTD.,, RAMGARH

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 17/RAN/2022[15-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi
6
Section 273B3
Section 14A3
27 May 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 133Section 133A

Section 201(1)/201(1A) of the Act by holding that "Admittedly, in this case despite making contrary observation, the ITO/TDS has accepted the transportation payment as genuine that is why he has computed the TDS liability on those payments u/s 201(1) and interest u/s 201(1A). Therefore, it is not in dispute that the transportation payments has been

M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LTD ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 130/RAN/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi20 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Manish Boradi.T.A. No.130/Ran/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S Bharat Coking Coal Ltd…………..…...…......................……...…..….. Appellant Finance Directorate, Ground Floor, Koyla Bhawan, Koyla Nagar, Dhanbad-826005. [Pan: Aaacb7934M] Vs. Acit, Circle-1, Dhanbad…..……………………….……….…………….. Respondent Appearances By: Shri M. K. Choudhary, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Saumyajit Das Gupta, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : August 26, 2022 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : September 20, 2022 Order Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 20.09.2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Dhanbad [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’).

Section 143(3)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 244ASection 250Section 40

TDS and another one against the order under section 143(3) of the Act for disallowance under section 40(a)(i)/(ia) of the Act. The disallowance under section 40 is with respect to same issue on which order under section 201

M/S. BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED,DHANBAD vs. JT. CIT, TDS,, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 75/RAN/2024[08-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 194ASection 201Section 271CSection 273BSection 40

section 201 or to impose penalty u/s 271C for default of non-deduction of TDS. 3. For that Ld. CIT(A) erred

M/S. BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED,,DHANBAD vs. JCIT, TDS CIRCLE,, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 76/RAN/2024[09-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 194ASection 201Section 271CSection 273BSection 40

section 201 or to impose penalty u/s 271C for default of non-deduction of TDS. 3. For that Ld. CIT(A) erred

M/S. BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED,DHANBAD vs. JCIT TDS, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 77/RAN/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Apr 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 194ASection 201Section 271CSection 273BSection 40

section 201 or to impose penalty u/s 271C for default of non-deduction of TDS. 3. For that Ld. CIT(A) erred

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD

ITA 293/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

3,376,336.00\nB.O.I. A/c 030\n2,299.66\n172,021,561.00\nB.O.I. A/c 0000106\n579,827.00\nB.O.I. A/c 0000110\n401,649.00\nSandry Crediter\nB.0.1. A/c 0000114\n781,633.00\nB.O.L. A/c 000035\n43,180.78\nAs per List Attached\n63633822.00\nB.0.1. A/c 000113\n5,000.00\nB.0.1. A/c 00004\n2,647,451.18\nB.O.L. A/c 000186\n1,705,016.10\nOutstanding Liabilities\nB.O.L

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

ITA 300/RAN/2017[09-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

201\n10,150.00\n115,745,225.00\nB.O.I. A/c 202\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 0000110\n3,553.00\nB.O.I. A/c 0000114\n10.350.00\nSundry Creditors\nB.0.1. A/c 000035\n11,486.00\nAs per List Attached\n45075456.00\n3.0.1. A/c 200\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 203\n10,150.00\nB.O.I. A/c 145\n4,850.00\nB.0.1. A/c 59019\n14,006 00\nOutstanding Liabilities\nB.O.L

ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

ITA 302/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

3)\n1 Contractual Expenses related to Kustore area (LB\nSingh)\n23,22,00,000\n1,33,93,00,000\n36,44,00,000\n3\nContractual Expenses (details not furnished)\n34,76,18,000\n4\nContractual Exp. Barora - Block II liab. disallowed\nu/s 40(a)(ia) - Settled in VsV Dt. 23.02.2021 &\n24.02.2021 - Not pressed\n35,88,38,000\n6\nGrant