BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 10(100)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,233Mumbai1,202Bangalore658Chennai421Kolkata269Hyderabad200Indore181Ahmedabad160Chandigarh155Karnataka135Jaipur130Pune112Raipur83Cochin66Cuttack44Surat42Visakhapatnam36Lucknow32Jabalpur26Amritsar23Nagpur22Rajkot19Guwahati18Telangana17Jodhpur16Agra14Dehradun14Patna14Panaji8Ranchi6SC6Varanasi5Rajasthan3Allahabad3Uttarakhand2Orissa1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 32(2)12Section 26312Section 143(3)9Addition to Income5Section 1474Section 14A3Depreciation3Disallowance3Set Off of Losses3Carry Forward of Losses

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, JAMSHEDPUR, JAMSHEDPUR vs. BENKO TRADERS PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 436/RAN/2024[2015]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi17 Dec 2025

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayi.T.A. No.436/Ran/2024 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Acit, Cc, Jamshedpur…………….…….…............................……….……Appellant Vs. Benko Traders Pvt. Ltd....………...….…..….........……........……...…..…..Respondent 119, 4Th Floor, Block D, White House, Park Stree, Wb – 700016. [Pan: Aabcb1888R] Appearances By: Shri Akshay Ringasia, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Khubchand T. Pandya, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : November 07, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : December 17, 2025 Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Patna For The Assessment Year 2015–16 Dated 25.09.2024 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (The ‘Act’). 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income Under Section 139 Of The Act Declaring A Total Income As Nil. The Return Was Processed Under Section 143(1). Subsequently, The Case Was Selected For Scrutiny & An Assessment Under Section 143(3) Was Completed On 28.11.2017 Determining The Total Income At ₹9,88,28,406. Based On Information Received From The Investigation Wing, Mumbai, Relating To Alleged Use Of Stock Exchange Platform (Bse/Nse) For Generating Fictitious Long-Term/Short-Term Capital Gains Through Certain Scripts & Alleged Accommodation Entries, The Assessing Officer Recorded Reasons Under Section 147 Of The Act. A Notice Under Section 148 Was Issued The Assessee Filed Its Return Declaring The Same Income

Section 139Section 143(1)Section 143(3)
3
Section 1482
Section 682
Section 147
Section 148
Section 250
Section 68
Section 69C

100, alleging that such commission was paid for obtaining accommodation entries. However, during the course of assessment proceedings, the AO did not carry out any independent enquiry or verification to validate the allegation. No summons were issued to the broker, no statement was recorded, and no evidence was gathered to suggest that the assessee made any payment over and above

SANJAY CHAWLA,CHAIBASA vs. PR. CIT, RANCHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 135/RAN/2025[20-21]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi07 Oct 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahaysanjay Chawla, Pr.C.I.T., Sentola, Chaibasa-833201 (Jharkhand) Ranchi. Vs. Pan No. Acmpc 6808 J Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 263Section 63

TDS & TCS provisions. 7. That as stated above, it is not a case where no enquiry or no application of mind has been done by the Ld AO. Apparently what can be opined is only that the Ld PCTT was not fully convinced with the enquiry and verification done by the Ld AO and as such, the powers vested

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD

ITA 293/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

100,000.00 839,308,307.00\nCash ar Bank\nB.O.I., ENA Branch, CP A/c 174\n139,750.19\nB.O.I., ENA Branch, SB A/c 17205\n694,093.80\nLess:-Drawing\nU.C.O. Bank C/a 20150\n30,781.00\nPersonal USt\n455,028.00\nU.C.O. Bank C/a 20133\n235,417.57\nGift to Brother\n57,500,000.00 57,955,028.00\nU.B.I, Dhan., A/c 21024\n5,373.00\n781

SHRIRAM MARKETING SERVICES,GIRIDIH vs. PCIT, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 104/RAN/2022[13-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi28 Mar 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 147Section 148Section 263

100, 000 24 23.07.2012 9,50,000 ' 0059050048595 25 27.07.2012 9,50,000 26 14.08.2012 9,50,000 27 17.09,2012 9,00,000 28 10.10,2012 2,93,000 29 22.11.2012 5,00,000 30 10.12.2012 11,000 31 29.12.2012 2,00,000 32 17.01.2013 20,000 33 14.02.2013 10,000 34 28.02.2013 10,000 35 06.03.2013 10

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

ITA 300/RAN/2017[09-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

100,000.00 839,308,307.00\nCash ar Bank\nB.O.I., ENA Branch, CP A/c 174\n139,750.19\nB.O.I., ENA Branch, SB A/c 17205\n694,093.80\nLess:-Drawing\nU.C.O. Bank C/a 20150\n30,781.00\nPersonal USt\n455,028.00\nU.C.O. Bank C/a 20133\n235,417.57\nGift to Brother\n57,500,000.00 57,955,028.00\nU.B.I, Dhan., A/c 21024\n5,373.00\n781

ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LTD , DHANBAD

ITA 302/RAN/2017[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi06 Jan 2026
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 32(2)

100,000.00 839,308,307.00\nCash ar Bank\nC\nLess:-Drawing\nB.O.I., ENA Branch, CP A/c 174\n139,750.19\nB.O.I., ENA Branch, SB A/c 17205\n694,093.80\nPersonal USt\n455,028.00\nU.C.O. Bank C/a 20150\n30,781.00\nGift to Brother\n57,500,000.00 57,955,028.00\nU.C.O. Bank C/a 20133\n235,417.57\nU.B.I, Dhan., A/c 21024\n5,373.00\n781