BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

138 results for “TDS”+ Deductionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,816Delhi5,401Bangalore2,605Chennai2,203Kolkata1,839Pune1,422Ahmedabad1,140Hyderabad869Cochin757Patna747Indore731Jaipur671Chandigarh551Karnataka443Nagpur390Cuttack365Raipur359Visakhapatnam316Surat257Rajkot228Lucknow184Amritsar165Ranchi138Jodhpur134Dehradun93Agra86Jabalpur85Panaji84Guwahati76Telangana68Allahabad67Varanasi26SC25Calcutta21Kerala17Himachal Pradesh6Rajasthan6Punjab & Haryana5J&K5Orissa4Uttarakhand2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 234E219Section 200A172TDS68Addition to Income42Section 143(3)36Section 4034Disallowance34Deduction32Section 80I28Section 194C

ITO, TDS, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. M/S. CHHINAMASTIKA CEMENT & ISPAT PVT. LTD.,, RAMGARH

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 18/RAN/2022[16-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi27 May 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 133Section 133A

deducted. The fact is that in case of the assessee, such TDS was never deducted and as such, the date

ITO, TDS,, RANCHI vs. M/S. CHINNAMASTIKA CEMENT & ISPAT LTD.,, RAMGARH

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue are dismissed

ITA 17/RAN/2022[15-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi27 May 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 133

Showing 1–20 of 138 · Page 1 of 7

27
Section 14A26
Section 14725
Section 133A

deducted. The fact is that in case of the assessee, such TDS was never deducted and as such, the date

M/S. BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED,DHANBAD vs. JCIT TDS, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 77/RAN/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Apr 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 194ASection 201Section 271CSection 273BSection 40

deducted TDS in regular course on the items on which TDS was required to be deducted and have filed TDS

M/S. BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED,DHANBAD vs. JT. CIT, TDS,, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 75/RAN/2024[08-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 194ASection 201Section 271CSection 273BSection 40

deducted TDS in regular course on the items on which TDS was required to be deducted and have filed TDS

M/S. BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED,,DHANBAD vs. JCIT, TDS CIRCLE,, DHANBAD

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed

ITA 76/RAN/2024[09-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi29 Apr 2025

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay

Section 194ASection 201Section 271CSection 273BSection 40

deducted TDS in regular course on the items on which TDS was required to be deducted and have filed TDS

M/S STROKES ADVERTISING PVT. LTD.,,RANCHI vs. DCIT,C-2, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 81/RAN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi26 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Gargआयकर अऩीऱ सं./Ita No.81/Ran/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2013-2014) M/S Strokes Advertising Pvt Ltd Vs. Dcit, Circle-2, Ranchi C/O Sri Vinay Kumar Jalan, M/S O.P.Jalan & Associates Consultants Llp, 48 Cart Sarai Road, Upper Bazaar, Ranchi, Jharkhand, Pin-834001 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aancs 6471 M (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. यनधागररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Vinay Kumar Jalan, Fca राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri P.K.Mondal, Acit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 24/05/2019 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 26/07/2019 आदेश / O R D E R This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Ranchi, Jharkhand, Dated 31.10.2018 Passed In First Appeal No.Cit(A), Ranchi/10077/2017-18 For The Assessment Year 2013-2014. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. Under The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The 50% Of Total Disallowance Made By The Ld. Assessing Officer Amounting To Rs.2,53,884/- With Respect To The Amounts Debited In The P&L Account Relating To Fuel Expenses, Fabrications Works, Mounting Of Flex & Site Expenses 2. Under The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The Addition Made By The Ld. Assessing Officer Amounting To Rs.6,47,400/ Considering It To Be Commission Paid Without Deduction Of Tds.”

For Appellant: Shri Vinay Kumar Jalan, FCAFor Respondent: Shri P.K.Mondal, ACIT(DR)
Section 143(2)Section 44A

deducted TDS on the impugned amount of commission paid by it more than Rs.40 lakhs but the TDS was not deducted

HEC LTD,FINANCE &ACCOUNTS,RANCHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, RANCHI

In the result, all appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 232/RAN/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Apr 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, J.M. & Dr.A.L.Saini, A.M.)

For Appellant: None appearedFor Respondent: Shri Indrajit Singh, CIT/ld.DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 37(1)

deducted TDS wherever applicable. The company has also added back the entire expenses in cases where non deduction of TDS

HEC LTD,FINANCE &ACCOUNTS,RANCHI vs. ACIT,CIR-1, RANCHI

In the result, all appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 231/RAN/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Apr 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, J.M. & Dr.A.L.Saini, A.M.)

For Appellant: None appearedFor Respondent: Shri Indrajit Singh, CIT/ld.DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 37(1)

deducted TDS wherever applicable. The company has also added back the entire expenses in cases where non deduction of TDS

DCIT CIRCLE-1, RANCHI vs. M/S HEC LTD, RANCHI

In the result, all appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and all appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 95/RAN/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Apr 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, J.M. & Dr.A.L.Saini, A.M.)

For Appellant: None appearedFor Respondent: Shri Indrajit Singh, CIT/ld.DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 37(1)

deducted TDS wherever applicable. The company has also added back the entire expenses in cases where non deduction of TDS

DEVPRABHA CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LTD.,,DHANBAD vs. PCIT, DHANBAD

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 27/RAN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi30 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahay(Virtual Hearing) Devprabha Construction Private Ltd., P.C.I.T., Dev Villa, Behind Radha Swamy Arcade, Dhanbad, Vs. Saraidhela, Dhanbad-828127. Aayakar Bhawan, Luby Pan No. Aaecb 2652 A Circular Road, Dhanbad-826001 (Jharkhand) Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 263

TDS not deducted, out of which AO has conducted enquiry and verified only 5 persons. b) Hire Charges have been

SHRI VINSHNU KUMAR JALAN,RANCHI vs. ACIT CIR-3, RANCHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 98/RAN/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi21 May 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadaleassessment Year: 2013-2014

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Poddar/Devesh Poddar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri P.K.Mondal, JCIT
Section 194(6)Section 194CSection 40

deducting TDS which was liable for such deduction. The assessee was liable to deduct TDS on transport payments made if Form

ACIT CIR-1 , DHANBAD vs. M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LTD, DHANBAD

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed and appeal by the assessee is partly allowed as well as cross-objection by the assessee is allowed

ITA 298/RAN/2017[08-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi31 Mar 2023

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 31(1)Section 32(1)Section 32(2)

TDS was not deducted in violation of provision of section 40(a)(ia). The disallowance made is unjustified and illegal

M/S BHARAT COOKING COAL LIMITED ,DHANBAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1 , DHANBAD

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed and appeal by the assessee is partly allowed as well as cross-objection by the assessee is allowed

ITA 290/RAN/2017[08-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi31 Mar 2023

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 31(1)Section 32(1)Section 32(2)

TDS was not deducted in violation of provision of section 40(a)(ia). The disallowance made is unjustified and illegal

JHARKHAND STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LIMITED,RANCHI vs. ACIT, C.C.1, RANCHI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 38/RAN/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi05 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayjharkhand State Beverages A.C.I.T., Corporation Limited, Central Circle-1, Vs. Utpad Bhawan, Kanke Road, Ranchi. Ranchi-834008. Pan No. Aaccj 5622 N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

deduction of TDS, the Assessing Officer had disallowed 30% of the said expenses on which the TDS had not been

COMMERCIAL CARRIERS PVT. LTD.,,JAMSHEPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), JAMSHEPUR

Appeal is allowed

ITA 192/RAN/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi04 Mar 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Sainiassessment Year :2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 194CSection 40

deducting TDS. This disallowance sum in dispute involves figure of Rs.3,34,60,529/-. There is no dispute that the assessee

RAMSHAKAL CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD,JAMSHEDPUR vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4/RAN/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi22 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S. S. Godara, J.M. & Dr.A.L.Saini, A.M.)

For Appellant: None appearedFor Respondent: Shri Chandan Das, JCIT/ld.DR
Section 143(3)

TDS deducted, after verifying the TDS certificates. 9. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical

MOUNT OLIVE'S WELFARE TRUST,GUMLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS) WARD- RANCHI, RANCHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 252/RAN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi09 Jun 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: the Tribunal was due to the fact that after corona virus

For Appellant: Shri Vinay Goenka, ld ARFor Respondent: Shri Khub Chand Pandya, Sr hri Khub Chand Pandya, Sr DR

TDS has been deducted. It was the submission that the impugned assessment year being 2015-16 and the requirement of TDS

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RANCHI, RANCHI vs. SHRI VIJAY PRASAD, JAMSHEDPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue as well as cross-objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 35/RAN/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi11 Dec 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Bleassessment Year: 2012-13 Acit, Central Circle-1, Ranchi Shri Vijay Prasad Flat No. 202, Madhusudan Sir Vs Krishanapuri, Dimna Road Mango, Jamshedpur-831012. Pan: Ailpp 0228 L (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No.19/Ran/2021 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 35/Ran/2021) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Vijay Prasad Acit, Central Circle-1, Ranchi Flat No. 202, Madhusudan Sir Vs Krishanapuri, Dimna Road Mango, Jamshedpur-831012. Pan: Ailpp 0228 L (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 29.11.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 11.12.2023 O R D E R Per Sonjoy Sarma: Jm This Appeal Is Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A)-3, Patna Dated 09.03.2021 Against Same Impugned Order A Cross-Objection Also Filed By The Assessee Being C.O. No. 19/Ran/2021. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are The Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income For The A.Y. 2012-13 On 11.09.2012 Showing Total Income Of Rs. 14,32,834/-. The Case Of The Assessee Was Selected For Scrutiny Under Cass & The Assessment In The Case Of Assessee Was Completed U/S 143(3) Of The Act On 28.03.2014 Determining Total Income Of Rs.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Pranob Kumar Koley, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 194(7)Section 194CSection 40

deduction of TDS is a fat mat of and consequent of the first statutory obligation to not deduct TDS on receipt

ITO, TDS WARD, RANCHI vs. M/S AWADHESH SINGH CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.,, RANCHI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 281/RAN/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi30 Sept 2020AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri S.S. Godara, Jm

Section 133ASection 194CSection 201(1)

deducted TDS M/s Awadesh Singh Construction Pvt. Ltd. ITA Nos.280&281/Ran/2019 Assessment Years:2016-17 & 2017-18 Page 2 on alleged

ITO, TDS WARD, RANCHI vs. M/S AWADHESH SINGH CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.,, RANCHI

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 280/RAN/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Ranchi30 Sept 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Am & Shri S.S. Godara, Jm

Section 133ASection 194CSection 201(1)

deducted TDS M/s Awadesh Singh Construction Pvt. Ltd. ITA Nos.280&281/Ran/2019 Assessment Years:2016-17 & 2017-18 Page 2 on alleged