BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 69Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai421Delhi276Jaipur130Bangalore73Chandigarh58Kolkata45Indore44Hyderabad39Chennai26Surat22Agra20Lucknow20Ahmedabad19Guwahati16Pune13Nagpur12Amritsar8Visakhapatnam4Jodhpur4Raipur3Rajkot3Allahabad2SC1Varanasi1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 69B2Section 142(1)2Penalty2Survey u/s 133A2

K B JWELLERS,GANDHIDHAM vs. ITO WARD 1 GANDHIDHAM, GADHIDHAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 788/RJT/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot01 Apr 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Sanghavi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Dheeraj Kumar Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 145(3)Section 69B

transferred for melting and out of which 24 carat gold received was of 9655.903 grams means there was a loss of 2402.73 grams. Same way Gold ornaments of 18 carat was sent for melting and out of which 24 carat gold received was of 362.800 grams and there was a loss of 190.091 grams. Thus total loss due to closer

THE ACIT, CIRCLE- 1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. SMT. MANISHABEN N. MASHRU,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 355/RJT/2011[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Jan 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Shri Rajpal Yadavsr.No.

For Appellant: Shri M.J. Ranpura, CAFor Respondent: Shri Hargovind Singh, CIT-DR
Section 131Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

transferred to the travel agents the assessee should have deducted TDS by treating such discount as commission. 42. On appeal, the ld.CIT(A) has confirmed disallowance. The ld.counsel for the assessee contended that the issue in dispute is squarely covered by the decision of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Ahmedabad Stamp Vendors Association Vs. Union

SHRI DAMJIBHAI LEKHRAJBHAI THAVRANI,,JUNAGADH vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD 1(2)(4),, RAJKOT

ITA 16/RJT/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2010-11

price. As per IT Act, any purchase in cash above Rs. 20,000 (now 10,000) is not permitted. Buyers across India deposit the cash purchase- amount into the bank-account of self-styled Angadiya/shroff, who remitted cash to seller, after deducting commission. In certain instances, such Bank-accounts were also used for layering and delayering of funds