BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 54Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh27Delhi26Indore17Ahmedabad15Jaipur13Mumbai13Bangalore11Raipur9Chennai8Pune8Surat7Agra4Hyderabad3Karnataka3Telangana3SC2Amritsar2Rajkot2Nagpur1Calcutta1Jodhpur1Kolkata1Allahabad1Lucknow1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 54F8Section 143(3)6Section 2634Section 54B2Long Term Capital Gains2Deduction2Survey u/s 133A2

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2) (5), , RAJKOT vs. SHRI DHIRAJLAL BHANJIBHAI VADALIA, RAJKOT

ITA 228/RJT/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jun 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year : 2009-10 Shri Dhirajlal Bhanjibhai Vadalia Cit-1, 1St Floor, Sterling Appts., Vs Rajkot. Jawahar Road, Rajkot.

For Appellant: Shri Deepak Rindani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Samir Tekriwal, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 54BSection 54F

section requires only user of the land for agricultural purposes and no sale of produce for legal provisions of Sec. 54B and thus the same cannot constitute an error as far as the provisions of Sec. 263 are concerned. Your notice itself, in para 3 thereof, states that the claim of deduction u/s 54B "does not appear

SHRI DHIRAJLAL BHANJIBHAI VADALIA,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

ITA 135/RJT/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jun 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year : 2009-10 Shri Dhirajlal Bhanjibhai Vadalia Cit-1, 1St Floor, Sterling Appts., Vs Rajkot. Jawahar Road, Rajkot.

For Appellant: Shri Deepak Rindani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Samir Tekriwal, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 54BSection 54F

section requires only user of the land for agricultural purposes and no sale of produce for legal provisions of Sec. 54B and thus the same cannot constitute an error as far as the provisions of Sec. 263 are concerned. Your notice itself, in para 3 thereof, states that the claim of deduction u/s 54B "does not appear