BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “section 68”+ Section 273Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai35Ahmedabad26Delhi23Karnataka21Surat16Jaipur13Hyderabad11Bangalore11Chennai11Visakhapatnam9Kolkata9Chandigarh7Cochin7Nagpur7Rajkot6Pune4Jabalpur3Cuttack3Allahabad1Varanasi1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 271F33Section 153A9Section 271(1)(c)8Section 271B8Section 2507Penalty6Section 143(3)5Section 44A4Section 1394Addition to Income

SHRI SACHIN MAROTRAO RANGARI,RAJKOT vs. THE ACIT CIR-1, GANDHIDHAM, GANDHIDHAM

In the result, the grounds raised by the Assessee is allowed and the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 106/RJT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Sept 2022AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Fenil Mehta, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr.D.R
Section 271BSection 44A

68 wherein it was held that the ICAI has published same material under the head ‘Guidance Note’ on Tax Audit under Section44AB of the IT Act. “Interpreting the meaning of I.T.A No. 106/Rjt/2021 A.Y. 2016-17 Page No 7 Sachin Marotrao Rangari vs. ACIT turnover by ICAI which is having a statutory recognition”. The said material has been published

SUBHAS HANSARAJ NANDU,BHACHAU, KUTCH vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

4
Disallowance3
ITA 9/RJT/2024[2010-11]Status: Disposed
ITAT Rajkot
05 Jun 2025
AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hybrid Hearing) Assessment Year: (2010-11) Subhas Hansaraj Nandu Vs. National Faceless Assessment Opp:Shambhu Maharaj Bungalow Centre, Delhi. Bhachau, Gujarat. Pan : Afrpn 0720 J (Assessee) (Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr.Dr

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr.DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 68

68 of the I.T. Act, 1961 and disallowing Rs. 54,950/- on account of interest paid to the depositors. The above narrated facts clearly state that the initial onus was duly discharged by the assessee, during the assessment proceedings and then the onus was upon the department to collect all the details from the third parties. Since the department could

SHRI JITENDRA MAJITHIA,JAM KHAMBHALIYA vs. THE NFAC DELHI, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 181/RJT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot18 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Sagar Shah, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 250Section 271BSection 44A

273B of the Act, no penalty shall be imposed u/s. 271B if the assessee is able to show that there was reasonable cause for the failure alleged on his part. The ignorance of law cannot be considered as a reasonable cause for not getting his accounts audited. Further, the AO has not levied penalty u/s. 271B mechanically but the penalty

PANKAJ CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CC-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 4/RJT/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot25 Jan 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 132(1)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271BSection 271F

68,82,480/- for AY 2011-12 and (iii) Rs. 1,38,90,64,100/- as against returned income of Rs. 4,82,13,340/- for AY 2012-13. I.T.A Nos. 4, 5 & 6/Rjt/2022 A.Y. 2010-11 to 2012-13 Page No 3 Shri Pankaj Chimanlal Lodhiya vs. ACIT 2.2. Thereafter, the AO initiated the penalty proceedings u/s. 271F

PANKAJ CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CC-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 5/RJT/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot25 Jan 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 132(1)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271BSection 271F

68,82,480/- for AY 2011-12 and (iii) Rs. 1,38,90,64,100/- as against returned income of Rs. 4,82,13,340/- for AY 2012-13. I.T.A Nos. 4, 5 & 6/Rjt/2022 A.Y. 2010-11 to 2012-13 Page No 3 Shri Pankaj Chimanlal Lodhiya vs. ACIT 2.2. Thereafter, the AO initiated the penalty proceedings u/s. 271F

PANKAJ CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CENTARL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 6/RJT/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot25 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 132(1)Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271BSection 271F

68,82,480/- for AY 2011-12 and (iii) Rs. 1,38,90,64,100/- as against returned income of Rs. 4,82,13,340/- for AY 2012-13. I.T.A Nos. 4, 5 & 6/Rjt/2022 A.Y. 2010-11 to 2012-13 Page No 3 Shri Pankaj Chimanlal Lodhiya vs. ACIT 2.2. Thereafter, the AO initiated the penalty proceedings u/s. 271F