SHRI PARESHKUMAR NARSHIBHAI SIROYA,DHORAJI, DIST. RAJKOT vs. THE PR. CIT-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

sections": [ "263", "143(3)", "44AD", "68", "271B", "133(6)", "142(1)" ], "issues": "Whether the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax rightly

MANISH PUNJABHAI ODEDRA,PORBANDAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(4), PORBANDAR, GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

section 271B of the Act. Accordingly the AO sought\nclarification from the assessee.\n5. The assessee during the assessment proceedings submitted that he has incurred a loss\nof Rs. 60,68

SHRI MANISH PUNJABHAI ODEDARA,PORBANDAR vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (4), PORBANDAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

section 271B of the Act. Accordingly the AO sought clarification from the assessee. 5. The assessee during the assessment proceedings submitted that he has incurred a loss of Rs. 60,68

SHRI VISHAL MEHTA ,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO WARD-2(1) (2) RAJKOT, RAJKOT

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Sainiand Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपीलसं/.Ita No.74 To 77/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years: (2012-13 To 2015-2016) Vishal Mehta Income Tax Officer, बनाम Pravin Chamber, 1St Floor, Ward-2(1)(2), Rajkot Kothariya Naka Soni Bazar, Vs. Rajkot-360 001 Pan/Gir No.Ahtpm 7247 B "थायीलेखासं /. जीआइआरसं /. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) .. (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Chetan Agarwal, Ar & Shri Brijesh Parekh, Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Cit-Dr & Shri Abhimanyhu Singh, Sr-Dr

271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Since in these four appeals, filed by the assessee, the identical and similar issues are involved, hence, all these appeals are clubbed and ITA Nos.74-77/Rjt/2024 (AYs-12-13 to 15-16) Vishal Mehta 2 heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake

SHRI VISHAL MEHTA ,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO WARD-2 (1) (2), RAJKOT

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Sainiand Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपीलसं/.Ita No.74 To 77/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years: (2012-13 To 2015-2016) Vishal Mehta Income Tax Officer, बनाम Pravin Chamber, 1St Floor, Ward-2(1)(2), Rajkot Kothariya Naka Soni Bazar, Vs. Rajkot-360 001 Pan/Gir No.Ahtpm 7247 B "थायीलेखासं /. जीआइआरसं /. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) .. (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Chetan Agarwal, Ar & Shri Brijesh Parekh, Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Cit-Dr & Shri Abhimanyhu Singh, Sr-Dr

271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Since in these four appeals, filed by the assessee, the identical and similar issues are involved, hence, all these appeals are clubbed and ITA Nos.74-77/Rjt/2024 (AYs-12-13 to 15-16) Vishal Mehta 2 heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake

SHRI VISHAL MEHTA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO WARD-2 (1) (2), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Sainiand Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपीलसं/.Ita No.74 To 77/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years: (2012-13 To 2015-2016) Vishal Mehta Income Tax Officer, बनाम Pravin Chamber, 1St Floor, Ward-2(1)(2), Rajkot Kothariya Naka Soni Bazar, Vs. Rajkot-360 001 Pan/Gir No.Ahtpm 7247 B "थायीलेखासं /. जीआइआरसं /. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) .. (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Chetan Agarwal, Ar & Shri Brijesh Parekh, Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Cit-Dr & Shri Abhimanyhu Singh, Sr-Dr

271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Since in these four appeals, filed by the assessee, the identical and similar issues are involved, hence, all these appeals are clubbed and ITA Nos.74-77/Rjt/2024 (AYs-12-13 to 15-16) Vishal Mehta 2 heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake

SHRI VISHAL MEHTA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO WARD-2(1) (2) , RAJKOT

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Sainiand Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपीलसं/.Ita No.74 To 77/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years: (2012-13 To 2015-2016) Vishal Mehta Income Tax Officer, बनाम Pravin Chamber, 1St Floor, Ward-2(1)(2), Rajkot Kothariya Naka Soni Bazar, Vs. Rajkot-360 001 Pan/Gir No.Ahtpm 7247 B "थायीलेखासं /. जीआइआरसं /. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) .. (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Chetan Agarwal, Ar & Shri Brijesh Parekh, Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Cit-Dr & Shri Abhimanyhu Singh, Sr-Dr

271B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2. Since in these four appeals, filed by the assessee, the identical and similar issues are involved, hence, all these appeals are clubbed and ITA Nos.74-77/Rjt/2024 (AYs-12-13 to 15-16) Vishal Mehta 2 heard together and a consolidated order is being passed for the sake

ASHOK SHANKARNARAYAN HEBBAR,JAMNAGAR. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3),, JAMNAGAR

Appeal of the assessee are allowed

271B of the act. The assessee was show caused vide notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271A of the act on 22nd Feb, 2016 to explain why not the penalty u/s. 271A should be imposed. The assessee has not made any compliance. Therefore, the assessing officer has imposed penalty of Rs. 25,000/- as the assessee has failed to keep or maintain

ASHOK SHANKARNARAYAN HEBBAR,JAMNAGAR. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3),, JAMNAGAR

Appeal of the assessee are allowed

271B of the act. The assessee was show caused vide notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271A of the act on 22nd Feb, 2016 to explain why not the penalty u/s. 271A should be imposed. The assessee has not made any compliance. Therefore, the assessing officer has imposed penalty of Rs. 25,000/- as the assessee has failed to keep or maintain

ASHISH MANSUKHLAL GOKANI,MITHAPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Sainiआयकरअपील सं. /Ita No.483/Rjt/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2013-14 बनाम Ashish Mansukhlal Gokani Commissioner Of Income Tax Mithapur, Dist: Devbhoomi, (Appeals), / Dwarka (Guj) – 361345 National Faceless Assessment Vs [Mahesh N. Paun Advocate, Centre (Nfac), Income Tax Taxation Consultant, Shreeji Department, Delhi Chambers, 17-Nava Para, Near S.B.I. (Adb), Jam-Khambhaliya, Gujarat – 361305] "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aappg2259N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

68 sum of Rs.70,38,117/- as unexplained income with regard to bank credits which made out of normal course of business and initiate the separately penalty proceeding u/s. 271B as well as Ld. Commissioner of Appeals (NFAC) by not considering the submission fully, rather than deleting the addition partly substained to the extent

PANKAJ CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CENTARL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

Bench: Ms. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

section 139 of the Act for the Assessment Year 2010-11 on 15.10.2010; for the Assessment Year 2011-12 on 28.09.2011 and for the Assessment Year 2012-13 on 29.03.2013. A Search operation u/s. 132(1) of the Act was carried out at the residence and business premises of the assessee on 20.05.2013. Thereafter the assessee was served with

PANKAJ CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CC-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

Bench: Ms. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

section 139 of the Act for the Assessment Year 2010-11 on 15.10.2010; for the Assessment Year 2011-12 on 28.09.2011 and for the Assessment Year 2012-13 on 29.03.2013. A Search operation u/s. 132(1) of the Act was carried out at the residence and business premises of the assessee on 20.05.2013. Thereafter the assessee was served with

PANKAJ CHIMANLAL LODHIYA,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CC-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

Bench: Ms. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

section 139 of the Act for the Assessment Year 2010-11 on 15.10.2010; for the Assessment Year 2011-12 on 28.09.2011 and for the Assessment Year 2012-13 on 29.03.2013. A Search operation u/s. 132(1) of the Act was carried out at the residence and business premises of the assessee on 20.05.2013. Thereafter the assessee was served with