Search: section 68

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 200Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Cochin154 Indore107 Bangalore87 Chennai35 Karnataka21 Mumbai13 Delhi13 Rajkot4 Jaipur3 Ahmedabad2 Kolkata2 Agra2 Uttarakhand1 Jodhpur1 Pune1 SC1 Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 234E16 Section 2064 Section 206C4 Section 206C(6)4 TDS4

VISHAL ENTERPRISE, ,JAMNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3,, JAMNAGAR.

ITA 347/RJT/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot31 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradip Kumar Kediasr.

For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Verma, Sr.DR

Section 206Section 206CSection 206C(6)Section 234E

68,692/- whose fine under section 234E was determined at Rs.12,48,800/- on the basis of number of days calculated by the AO. However, in the case of Rakesh B. Ladha, TCS was Rs.68,656/-. Penalty was restricted equivalent to this amount. Similar exercise was carried out in respect of other assessees. Dissatisfied with this levy of penalty

VISHAL ENTERPRISE, ,JAMNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3,, JAMNAGAR.

RAKESH BASANTILAL LADDHA,,JAMNAGAR. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3,, JAMNAGAR.

VISHAL ENTERPRISE, ,JAMNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3,, JAMNAGAR.

RAKESH BASANTILAL LADDHA,,JAMNAGAR. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3,, JAMNAGAR.

JAYESHBHAI KANJIBHAI DANGARIYA,,JAMNAGAR. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3,, JAMNAGAR.

PARAG MAKANBHAI PARSANA,JAMNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3,, JAMNAGAR.