BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

36 results for “section 68”+ Section 150(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,135Mumbai965Karnataka473Bangalore349Jaipur300Chennai265Ahmedabad251Hyderabad177Kolkata148Chandigarh125Indore121Cochin108Pune98Raipur60Surat56Calcutta52Allahabad47Cuttack42Nagpur39Telangana37Rajkot36Guwahati32Lucknow31Ranchi31Amritsar22Visakhapatnam20Jodhpur15SC15Dehradun10Panaji6Agra6Varanasi6Patna5Rajasthan5Jabalpur4Orissa3Andhra Pradesh1Uttarakhand1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 6850Section 143(3)31Addition to Income27Section 26326Section 14717Section 25015Section 14813Survey u/s 133A10Section 1447Cash Deposit

SHRI JAWAHIR RAVICHANDRA MEHTA,DUBAI(UAE) vs. THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result appeal of the assessee vide ITA/81/Rjt/2020 stands dismissed

ITA 81/RJT/2020[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot27 Dec 2021AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad, Judicial Memebr & Shri Amarjit Singh, Accountant Memebr

Section 132Section 147Section 148Section 149Section 149(3)Section 4

150, as amended with effect from 1.4.1989, does not enable the Authorities to reopen assessments, which have become final due to bar of limitation prior to 1.4.1989 and this position is applicable equally to reassessments proposed on the basis of Orders passed under the Act or under any other law." 14. The ratio of K.M Sharma and S.S. Gadgil

Showing 1–20 of 36 · Page 1 of 2

7
Section 142(1)6
Disallowance6

HOLLIS VITRIFIED PRIVATE LIMITED,MORBI, GUJARAT, INDIA vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT, GUJARAT, INDIA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee, is dismissed

ITA 363/RJT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot12 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 363/Rjt/2024 (Assessment Year: 2018-19) (Hybrid Hearing) Hollis Vitrified Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Revenue Survey No. 756/P1/P1/P1, Opp. Tax-1, Rajkot Antique Granito, Ghuntu,-Lakhdhirpur Road, Morbi (Gujarat)-363642 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aacch5628Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Fenil H. Mehta, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

150 ITR 513 "An order could be said to be erroneous when either it did not decide a point and record a finding on an issue which ought to have been done or decided it wrongly." 13. The ld. PCIT also noted that with effect from 01/06/2015, Explanation 2 to the section 263(1) has been inserted by which

VIJAY ANANDBHAI CHAVDA,GONDAL vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, RAJKOT , RAJKOT

In the result, the order passed by the PCIT u/s 263 of the Act is hereby dismissed

ITA 117/RJT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Desai, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT-D.R
Section 115BSection 144Section 263Section 68

68 2. 18,83,64,331/- Unexplained sundry Section not creditors mentioned by the A.O. 3. 6,00,56,842/- 5% of purchase Section not mentioned by the A.O. 4. 1,34,27,150

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIR.-1(1), RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S REAL PROCON PVT. LTD.,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 498/RJT/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot29 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedअपील सं./Ita No.498/Rjt/2015 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2012-2013 D.C.I.T., M/S Real Procon Pvt. Ltd., Circle-1(1), Vs. Saneshwar Complex, Rajkot. Opp. Balalji Hall, 150 Ft. Ring Road, Rajkot.

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri S.S. Rathi, Sr.D.R
Section 133(6)Section 133ASection 68

150 ft. Ring Road, Rajkot. PAN: AAECR8684A (Applicant) (Respondent) Revenue by : Shri S.S. Rathi, Sr.D.R Assessee by : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, A.R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 22/03/2022 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date of Pronouncement:27/04/2022 आदेश/O R D E R PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Revenue against

FORTUNE DEVELOPERS,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1)(1),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 41/RJT/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri B. D. Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

150 Feet Ward-2(1)(1), Ring Road, Rajkot-360005 Rajkot PAN: AACFF3536A (Applicant) (Respondent) Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri B. D. Gupta, Sr. DR सुनवाईक"तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 21/12/2022 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement: 04/01/2023 आदेश/O R D E R PER WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance

THE DCIT, MORBI CIRCLE, , MORBI vs. M/S. CLAYRIS CERAMICS PVT. LTD.,, MORBI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 287/RJT/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot20 Dec 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 287/Rjt/2018 With Co No. 28/Rjt/2018 निर्धररवरध/Asstt. Year: 2013-14 D.C.I.T, M/S. Clayris Ceramic Pvt. Ltd., Morbi Circle, Vs. Opp. Soriso Ceramics, Morbi. B.H Fame Ceramics Pvt., 8A-Nh, Morbi.

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT. D.R
Section 68

section 68 of the Act by treating the unsecured loans as unexplained cash credit. 2.2 The facts in brief are that the assessee in the present case, a private limited company, is engaged in the business of manufacturing of tiles. During the ITA no.287/Rjt/2018 with C.O No.28/Rjt/2018 Asstt. Year 2013-14 3 year under consideration, the assessee has shown

THE DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 , RAJKOT vs. SHRI SHAMJIBHAI SADHABHAI KANGAD, GANDHIDHAM-KUTCH

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue, in IT(SS) No

ITA 321/RJT/2022[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot31 Jul 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआ.(खो और ज).सं./It(Ss)A Nos.11 To 20/Rjt/2022 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years:2011-12 To 2020-21 बनाम/ Shri Shamjibhai Sadhabhai Deputy Commissioner Of Kangad Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Vs. Bbz-S-60, Zanda Chowk, “Amruta Estate”, 2Nd Floor, Gandhidham-370 201 M.G. Road, Rajkot-360001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.:Adepk 3471 E (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) आ.(खो और ज).सं./It(Ss)A Nos.21 To 23/Rjt/2022 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Years:2014-15, 2016-17 &2017-18 बनाम/ Deputy Commissioner Of Income Shri Shamjibhai Sadhabhai Tax, Central Circle-1, “Amruta Kangad Vs. Estate”, 2Nd Floor, M.G. Road, Bbz-S-60, Zanda Chowk, Rajkot-360001 Gandhidham-370 201 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.:Aabca 8202 E (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent) आ.(खो और ज).सं./It(Ss)A Nos.15/Rjt/2023 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Year:2019-20 बनाम/ Deputy Commissioner Of Shri Hetab Shamjibhai Kangad Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Bbz-South-60, Zanda Chowk, Vs. “Amruta Estate”, 2Nd Floor, Gandhidham-370 201 M.G. Road, Rajkot-360001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.:Aqtpk 7484 M (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""यथ"/Respondent)

Section 153A

150 crores in addition to the deposits of the directors, shareholders and relatives in the companies. A chart showing year-wise exposure of debt was submitted before the assessing officer. It was submitted that properties & assets mortgaged for taking finance from the bank are all accounted for in the books of account of relevant group concern or in the books

FUSION GRANITO PRIVATE LIMITED,MORBI vs. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms

ITA 190/RJT/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. A. L. Saini, Am & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.190/Rjt/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Physical Hearing) Fusion Granito Pvt. Ltd. बनाम/ Principal Commissioner Of Income Revenue Survey No.555/P1/91, Tax-1, Vs. Nr. Khokhra Hanuman Temple, 2Nd Jetpar Road, Morbi-363641 Rajkot, Floor, “Aayakar Bhawan”, Race Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aadcf 0696 B (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By Shri Bandish Soparkar, Ar ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By Shri Praveen Verma, Cit Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing 24/06/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 10/09/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, A.M By Way Of This Appeal, The Assessee Has Challenged The Correctness Of The Order Passed By The Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1, Rajkot [In Short ‘Ld. Pcit’], Dated 27.03.2023, Under Section 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’] For The Assessment Year (Ay) 2018-19. 2. Grievances Raised By The Assessee, Which, Being Interconnected, Will Be Taken Up Together, Are As Follows: “1. The Revision Order U/S 263 Of The Act Dated 28.03.2023 Is Bad In Law. 2. The Hon’Ble Pr. Cit-1, Rajkot Has Erred In Law As Well As On Facts In Completing The Revision Proceedings U/S 263 Of The Act Hurriedly In Short Span Of Time Fusion Granito Pvt. Ltd.

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

1, Rajkot [in short ‘Ld. PCIT’], exercised his jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. On verification of records, it was observed by ld PCIT that the assessee had introduced huge amount in the company in the form of share application money amounting to Rs.12,50,00,000/-. One of the reasons for selection of case

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1,, JAMNAGAR vs. M/S. SENOR METALS PVT. LTD., JAMNAGAR

In the results the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 260/RJT/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot01 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms Suchitra Raghunath Kambleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 260/Rjt/2015 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year:2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Dushyant Maharshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Pratap Singh, C.I.T.D.R
Section 36Section 40Section 43(5)

68 087 77 55 982 1 73 60 002 1 93 45 151 (Increase )/Decrease in stock Opening stock By product 1 28 206 2 86 589 Work in process 5 86 46 481 6 63 78 651 Finished goods 1 11 79 254 77 63 967 Total 6 99 53 941 7 44 29 207 Closing stock By product

M/S. SIMERO VITRIFIED P. LTD. ,MORBI vs. THE PR. CIT-3 , RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 276/RJT/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot22 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Us Is A Private Limited Company & Engaged In The Business Of Manufacturing Of Vitrified Tiles. The Return Of Income Has Been E-Filed By The Assessee, On 10/09/2016 For Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2016-17, Reporting Loss Of Rs. 5,68,00,829/-, Which Was Later Revised On 09/03/2018, Declaring Total Loss Of Rs. 13,97,40,413/-, Claiming Investment Allowance U/S 32Ac Of The Income Tax Act. The Case Has Been Selected For Complete Scrutiny (Cass) Specifically To Examine The Followings: 1) Whether Outward Foreign Remittance Is From Disclosed Sources & Appropriate Withholding & Reporting Obligation Have Been Complied With; 2) Whether Investment & Income Relating To Properties Are Duly Disclosed; 3) Whether Receipt Of Foreign Remittance Has Been Correctly Offered For Tax And, 4) Whether Sundry Creditors Are Genuine. 4. The Assessment Order U/S 143(3) For The Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2016-17 Was Passed By Dcit, Morbi Circle, Morbi, Being The Assessing Officer (Ao), On 21/12/2018, Allowing The Loss Claimed Of Rs. 13,97,40,413/- To Be Carry Forward To Subsequent Years. 2

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 32ASection 68

section 68 of the Act, the assessee needs to explain the source of the source. However, the assessee has failed to prove the source of the source, as necessary documents and evidences were not filed by the assessee. As per ld DR balance-sheet and confirmation of certain shareholders are not available. The assessee has not submitted the entire

SHRI DHILAN BHUPATRAI BHATHA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO-WARD-1 (1), JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 152/RJT/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot20 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri Mahavir Prasad

For Appellant: Shri Ranjeet Lalchandani, ARFor Respondent: None
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 68

1), B/h. Raiya Telephone Exchange, Jamnagar 150 Feet Ring Road, Rajkot – 360005 PAN : AIDPB 8256 E अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Ranjeet Lalchandani, AR Revenue by : None सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 13/05/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date of Pronouncement: 25/05/2022 आदेश/O R D E R PER BENCH : These three appeals filed by the assessee

SHRI DHILAN BHUPATRAI BHATHA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO-WARD-1 (1), JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 150/RJT/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri Mahavir Prasad

For Appellant: Shri Ranjeet Lalchandani, ARFor Respondent: None
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 68

1), B/h. Raiya Telephone Exchange, Jamnagar 150 Feet Ring Road, Rajkot – 360005 PAN : AIDPB 8256 E अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Ranjeet Lalchandani, AR Revenue by : None सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 13/05/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date of Pronouncement: 25/05/2022 आदेश/O R D E R PER BENCH : These three appeals filed by the assessee

SHRI DHILAN BHUPATRAI BHATHA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO-WARD-1 (1), JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 151/RJT/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot20 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri Mahavir Prasad

For Appellant: Shri Ranjeet Lalchandani, ARFor Respondent: None
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 68

1), B/h. Raiya Telephone Exchange, Jamnagar 150 Feet Ring Road, Rajkot – 360005 PAN : AIDPB 8256 E अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Ranjeet Lalchandani, AR Revenue by : None सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 13/05/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date of Pronouncement: 25/05/2022 आदेश/O R D E R PER BENCH : These three appeals filed by the assessee

M\S. LEXICO CERAMICS,RAJKOT vs. THE PR. CIT-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1/RJT/2023[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Rajkot12 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalassessment Year : 2015-15 M/S Lexico Ceramics, C/O Kalpesh S. Doshi & Co., Vs Principal Commissioner Of Chartered Accountants, Income-Tax-1, 1006-09, The Spire-2, Near Sheetal Rajkot Park Brts Stop, 150 Ft. Ring Road, Rajkot-360005 Pan : Aaefl 8870 D अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ar Revenue By : Shri Shramdeep Sinha, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 19/04/2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 12/05/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Waseem Ahmed, Am :

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)

150 Ft. Ring Road, Rajkot-360005 PAN : AAEFL 8870 D अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, AR Revenue by : Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT-DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 19/04/2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 12/05/2023 आदेश/O R D E R PER WASEEM AHMED, AM : This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against

M/S AMBITIOUS FINANCE & INVESTMENT PVT. LTD.,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(4),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 123/RJT/2014[1997-98]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot06 Mar 2023AY 1997-98

Bench: Mrs. Annapurna Gupta & Mrs. Madhumita Royिनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 1997-98 M/S. Ambitious Finance & Vs. Income Tax Officer, Investment Pvt. Ltd., Ward- 2(4), 107, Kapad Market, Para Bazar, Rajkot Rajkot Pan : Aabca 8076 C अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" "" "" यथ" "" "" यथ" यथ"/ (Respondent) यथ" Assessee By : Written Submission Revenue By : Shri V.J. Boricha, Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 14.12.2022 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 06.03.2023 आदेश आदेश/O R D E R आदेश आदेश Per Annapurna Gupta:

For Appellant: Written SubmissionFor Respondent: Shri V.J. Boricha, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 234BSection 250

Section 144 of the I.T. Act on the best judgment and on the basis of material available with Department and inquiries conducted in this regard to establish interconnection between the deposits made by the depositors and introduction of the same into the books of accounts of the assessee. 6. The assessee is doing finance business. During

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2,, MORBI vs. M/S FAIZ INDS.,, WANKANER

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 96/RJT/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot31 Oct 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt.Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Year : 2013-14 Ito, Ward-2 Vs. M/S.Faiz Industries Morbi. B-1, National Highway Lalpar, Tal. Wankaner अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/(Respondent) Assessee By : Shri D.M. Rindani, Ld.Ar Revenue By : Shri Shramdeep Sinha, Ld.Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 16/10/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 31/10/2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Annapurna Guptapresent Appeal Has Been Filed By The Revenue Against Order Passed By The Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-3, Rajkot [Hereinafter Referred To As “Ld.Cit(A)Under Section 250(6) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 ("The Act" For Short) Dated 31.1.2017 Pertaining To The Asst.Year 2013-14. 2. Solitary Ground Raised In The Appeal Reads As Under:

For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, ld.CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 145Section 250(6)Section 44A

section 145 of the Act and valuing closing stock and inventories as prescribed under the Act and no error or defects has been pointed out by the lower authorities in this behalf. Thus, the assessee contended that the proposed addition was unjustified. However, the ld.AO did not accept the explanation of the assessee. He maintained his view of deliberate

TRICOT IMPEX PVT. LTD.,,RAJKOT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1),, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 455/RJT/2018[ 2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Sept 2022

Bench: Hearing Of Appeal.”

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 68

150 Feet Ring Vs (Respondent) Road, Opp. Big Bazar, Rajkot PAN: AAFCT0371D (Appellant) Assessee by: None Revenue by: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr. D.R. Date of hearing : 07-07-2022 Date of pronouncement : 21-09-2022 आदेश/ORDER PER BENCH:- This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2015-16, arises from order of the CIT(A)-2, Rajkot dated

ASHISHKUMAR BHAGVANJIBHAI KANSAGRA,RAJKOT vs. ACIT CIR - 2(1), RKT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 409/RJT/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot23 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Sainiआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.409/Rjt/2025 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2016-17) (Hybrid Hearing) Ashishkumar Bhagvanjibhai Vs. Acit Kansagara, Circle – 2(1), C-507, Imperial Heights, Rajkot - 360001 150 Feet Ring Road, Rajkot - 360005 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Acspk6893P (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Ms. Alpa V. Makadiya, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

150 Feet Ring Road, Rajkot - 360005 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: ACSPK6893P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Ms. Alpa V. Makadiya, Ld. AR Respondent by : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 02/09/2025 Date of Pronouncement : 23/09/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to Assessment Year 2016-17, is directed against

THE ITO, WARD-3(1),, JAMNAGAR vs. M/S 2D ENTERPRISE,, JAMNAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 278/RJT/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot31 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Ms. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Ms. Suchitra Kamble (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Mehul Ranpura, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Kumar Pandey, Sr. D.R
Section 142Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 68

150/- from H P Chemical Pvt. Ltd. and Rs. 10,74,250/- from Shahmaru Construction Pvt. Ltd. The assessee furnished the reply thereby submitting the copy of PAN card of depositors, copy of account of the above parties from assessee’s books of accounts, copy of confirmation of assessee’s accounts from books of depositors, copy of return of income

SHRI MAGANBHAI BACHUBHAI RUPAPARA,SHAPAR (VERAVAL), RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1)(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 67/RJT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot22 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Rashmin Vekariya, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B. D. Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 68

150/- as unexplained credit u/s 68 of the I.T. Act is upheld. 1. The appeal is treated as dismissed.” 5. The assessee is in appeal before us against the aforesaid order passed by Ld. CIT(Appeals) confirming the additions made by the AO in respect of agricultural income. The primary contention of the counsel for the assessee before