BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 145Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai156Cochin60Ahmedabad55Delhi48Chandigarh43Bangalore22Kolkata17Chennai16Agra10Jaipur7Pune7Surat5Karnataka2Rajkot2Calcutta1Visakhapatnam1Raipur1Ranchi1Hyderabad1Indore1Cuttack1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3Section 143(2)2Addition to Income2

AKSHAR JEWELLERS,JUNAGADH vs. DEPUTY / ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 535/RJT/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot31 Dec 2025AY 2023-24
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 234BSection 270A

68,10,310/- on account of estimation of\nprofit.\n9. Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee carried the\nmatter in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) who has confirmed the action of the\nassessing officer. The ld.CIT(A) observed that non-furnishing the quantity\ndetails and value is not a minor error, therefore, the rejection

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2,, JAMNAGAR vs. M/S HIRAVATI MARINE PRODUCTS (P) LTD.,, PORBANDAR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue and cross objection of the assessee both are dismissed

ITA 946/RJT/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot23 Sept 2019AY 2006-07
For Appellant: Shri P. M. Maharshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Jitendra Kumar, CIT-D.R
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

section 28 itself. Appellant has also placed reliance on the decision of Honourable Supreme court in the case of CIT V Mysore Sugar Co. ltd 46 ITR 649 (SC), in the case company has advanced money to sugarcane growers for purchase of sugarcane and when they are unable to supply sugarcane. The amount was written off and claimed