Search: section 68

7 results for “section 68”+ Section 10A(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 10A16 Section 80P11 Section 143(1)(a)9 Section 12A8 Section 1437 Section 139(1)7 Section 139(4)5 Section 143(3)5 Deduction5 Disallowance

THE ITO, WARD-2,, JUNAGADH vs. M/S D. JEWEL,, JUNAGADH

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 15/RJT/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot24 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Waseem Ahmedअपील सं./Ita No.15/Rjt/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year: 2013-2014 Income Tax Officer, M/S. D. Jewel, Ward-2, Vs. 1-Shishu Mangal Road, Junagadh. Gandhigram, Junagadh.

For Appellant: Shri Samir Jani, A.RFor Respondent: Shri S.S. Rathi, Sr.D.R

Section 10ASection 115J

68,63,487/- u/s 10A as well as u/s 10AA and claimed refund of Rs. 1,05,00,000/- paid as advance tax. 4.7 The assessee has also not selected/specified the date in ITR form where it has been asked that “if liable to furnish the audit report u/s 115JC of the Act mentioned the date of furnishing the audit

THE ITO, WARD-2,, JUNAGADH vs. M/S D. JEWEL,, JUNAGADH

ATUL AUTO LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIR.-1(1),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

THE ITO, WARD-2,, JUNAGADH vs. M/S D. JEWEL,, JUNAGADH

ATUL AUTO LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIR.-1(1),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

THE DY. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CIR.-1(1), RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S ATUL AUTO LIMITED,, SHAPAR.VERAVAL

GODHAVADAR SEVA SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD.,GODHAVADAR, LILIYA MOTA, AMRELI-365535 vs. THE ADIT (CPC), BANGALORE, BANGALORE

BATAVA DEVLI SEVA SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD.,BATAVA DEVLI, TAL. KUNLAVA, DIST. AMRELI. vs. THE ADIT, (CPC), BANGALORE, BANGALORE

SHREE SWAMINARAYAN MANDIR TRUST ,RAMPAR vs. THE ITO, EXEMPTION WARD - 1, RAJKOT

DAWOODI BOHRA JAMAT VERAVAL,VERAVAL vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), RAJKOT