Search: reassessment | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

53 results for “reassessment”+ Section 92clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,122 Delhi888 Bangalore385 Chennai331 Ahmedabad273 Jaipur248 Chandigarh137 Kolkata135 Hyderabad135 Pune89 Indore78 Surat72 Visakhapatnam71 Raipur54 Rajkot53 Guwahati46 Amritsar44 Telangana39 Lucknow32 Cochin31 Cuttack30 Allahabad28 Patna24 Nagpur22 Agra15 Karnataka11 SC8 Dehradun6 Orissa5 Calcutta4 Varanasi4 Jodhpur3 Ranchi2 Rajasthan2 Panaji2 K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 14776 Section 14864 Addition to Income45 Section 143(3)41 Section 25036 Reopening of Assessment17 Reassessment14 Survey u/s 133A12 Section 133A9

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

ITA 611/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR

Section 10Section 10(23)(iiia)Section 11Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)(b)

Showing 1–20 of 53 · Page 1 of 3

Section 142(1)9

92 taxmann.com 4 (Guj.)  Sunbarg Tradelink (P.) Ltd. v. ITO [2016] 74 taxmann.com 16 (Guj.)  Mahadev Trading Co. v. ITO [2012] 18 taxmann.com 353 (Ahd.) b) The notices u/s 148A(b) and 148 of the Act and the order u/s 148A(d) of the Act are in violation of Section 151A of the Act. 1. The notice u/s 148A

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

ITA 612/RJT/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR

Section 10Section 10(23)(iiia)Section 11Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)(b)

92 taxmann.com 4 (Guj.)  Sunbarg Tradelink (P.) Ltd. v. ITO [2016] 74 taxmann.com 16 (Guj.)  Mahadev Trading Co. v. ITO [2012] 18 taxmann.com 353 (Ahd.) b) The notices u/s 148A(b) and 148 of the Act and the order u/s 148A(d) of the Act are in violation of Section 151A of the Act. 1. The notice u/s 148A

KISHAN BEEJ,JAMNAGAR vs. ITO WARD 2(1), JAMNAGAR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 384/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.384/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2017-18 Kishan Beej Ito, Wared-2(1) बनाम Kashivishvanath Road Jamnagar – 361 001 Nr. P & T Office Vs. Jamnagar – 361 001 Pan : Aacfk 2114 P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) :

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-DR

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 250Section 271ASection 69Section 69A

92,000/-, under section 69A r.w.s. 115BBE of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 5. Aggrieved by the order of the assessing officer, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the ld.CIT(A), who has confirmed the action of the assessing officer. The ld.CIT(A) has just narrated the facts mentioned in the assessment order, and adjudicated the issue

KANAIYA FOOD PRODUCTS,JAMKANDORANA vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed

ITA 336/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos. 336/Rjt/2024 (Assessment Year: 2017-18) (Hybrid Hearing) Kanaiya Food Products, Vs. The Principal Commissioner Of A A, Dhoraji Jamkandorana Income Tax-1, Rajkot 2Nd Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, Race Road, Near Gujarat Pani Purvatha Tank, Course Ring Road, Rajkot Jamkandodrana-360405 Rajkot-361006 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aamfk9437F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Desai, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT-DR

Section 147Section 263Section 40ASection 40A(3)

92,475/- u/s. 40A(3A) of the IT Act. Therefore, assessment order passed was 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act, on 24/03/2022 by the Assessing Officer in respect of AY 2017-18, appears to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. 5.In response to such notice of ld.PCIT, the assessee has filed his reply

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. RK INFRALINK LLP, RAJKOT

In the result, ground No. 3 in Revenue`s appeal in ITA No

ITA 520/RJT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot24 Feb 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 528/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2019-20) M/S. R K Infralink Llp The Dcit, Cc-1, R K Empire, Nr. Mavdi Circle, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Amruta Estate, M Rajkot 360001 G Road, Rajkot 360001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaxfr9975L (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""थ"/Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

reassessment proceedings, therefore, we dismiss the ground raised by the assessee and confirm the findings of the learned CIT(A). 12. In the result, ground No.2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No.528/RJT/2024 A.Y.2019-20, and ground No. 2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No. 529-Rjt-24 A.Y. 2020-21, are dismissed. 13. The summarised and concise ground

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. RK INFRALINK LLP, RAJKOT

In the result, ground No. 3 in Revenue`s appeal in ITA No

ITA 521/RJT/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot24 Feb 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 528/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2019-20) M/S. R K Infralink Llp The Dcit, Cc-1, R K Empire, Nr. Mavdi Circle, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Amruta Estate, M Rajkot 360001 G Road, Rajkot 360001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaxfr9975L (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""थ"/Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

reassessment proceedings, therefore, we dismiss the ground raised by the assessee and confirm the findings of the learned CIT(A). 12. In the result, ground No.2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No.528/RJT/2024 A.Y.2019-20, and ground No. 2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No. 529-Rjt-24 A.Y. 2020-21, are dismissed. 13. The summarised and concise ground

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. RK INFRALINK LLP, RAJKOT

In the result, ground No. 3 in Revenue`s appeal in ITA No

ITA 518/RJT/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot24 Feb 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 528/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2019-20) M/S. R K Infralink Llp The Dcit, Cc-1, R K Empire, Nr. Mavdi Circle, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Amruta Estate, M Rajkot 360001 G Road, Rajkot 360001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaxfr9975L (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""थ"/Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

reassessment proceedings, therefore, we dismiss the ground raised by the assessee and confirm the findings of the learned CIT(A). 12. In the result, ground No.2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No.528/RJT/2024 A.Y.2019-20, and ground No. 2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No. 529-Rjt-24 A.Y. 2020-21, are dismissed. 13. The summarised and concise ground

R K INFRALINK LLP,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, ground No. 3 in Revenue`s appeal in ITA No

ITA 528/RJT/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot24 Feb 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 528/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2019-20) M/S. R K Infralink Llp The Dcit, Cc-1, R K Empire, Nr. Mavdi Circle, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Amruta Estate, M Rajkot 360001 G Road, Rajkot 360001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaxfr9975L (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""थ"/Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

reassessment proceedings, therefore, we dismiss the ground raised by the assessee and confirm the findings of the learned CIT(A). 12. In the result, ground No.2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No.528/RJT/2024 A.Y.2019-20, and ground No. 2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No. 529-Rjt-24 A.Y. 2020-21, are dismissed. 13. The summarised and concise ground

R K INFRALINK LLP,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, ground No. 3 in Revenue`s appeal in ITA No

ITA 529/RJT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot24 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 528/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2019-20) M/S. R K Infralink Llp The Dcit, Cc-1, R K Empire, Nr. Mavdi Circle, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Amruta Estate, M Rajkot 360001 G Road, Rajkot 360001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaxfr9975L (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""थ"/Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

reassessment proceedings, therefore, we dismiss the ground raised by the assessee and confirm the findings of the learned CIT(A). 12. In the result, ground No.2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No.528/RJT/2024 A.Y.2019-20, and ground No. 2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No. 529-Rjt-24 A.Y. 2020-21, are dismissed. 13. The summarised and concise ground

R K INFRALINK LLP,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CC-1, RAJKOT, RAJOKT

In the result, ground No. 3 in Revenue`s appeal in ITA No

ITA 530/RJT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot24 Feb 2026AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 528/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2019-20) M/S. R K Infralink Llp The Dcit, Cc-1, R K Empire, Nr. Mavdi Circle, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Amruta Estate, M Rajkot 360001 G Road, Rajkot 360001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaxfr9975L (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""थ"/Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

reassessment proceedings, therefore, we dismiss the ground raised by the assessee and confirm the findings of the learned CIT(A). 12. In the result, ground No.2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No.528/RJT/2024 A.Y.2019-20, and ground No. 2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No. 529-Rjt-24 A.Y. 2020-21, are dismissed. 13. The summarised and concise ground

R K INFRALINK LLP,RAJKOT vs. ACIT, CC-1, RAJKOT , RAJKOT

In the result, ground No. 3 in Revenue`s appeal in ITA No

ITA 531/RJT/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot24 Feb 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 528/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2019-20) M/S. R K Infralink Llp The Dcit, Cc-1, R K Empire, Nr. Mavdi Circle, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Amruta Estate, M Rajkot 360001 G Road, Rajkot 360001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaxfr9975L (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""थ"/Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

reassessment proceedings, therefore, we dismiss the ground raised by the assessee and confirm the findings of the learned CIT(A). 12. In the result, ground No.2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No.528/RJT/2024 A.Y.2019-20, and ground No. 2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No. 529-Rjt-24 A.Y. 2020-21, are dismissed. 13. The summarised and concise ground

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. RK INFRALINK LLP, RAJKOT

In the result, ground No. 3 in Revenue`s appeal in ITA No

ITA 519/RJT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot24 Feb 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 528/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: (2019-20) M/S. R K Infralink Llp The Dcit, Cc-1, R K Empire, Nr. Mavdi Circle, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Amruta Estate, M Rajkot 360001 G Road, Rajkot 360001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaxfr9975L (अपीलाथ"/Assessee) (""थ"/Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

reassessment proceedings, therefore, we dismiss the ground raised by the assessee and confirm the findings of the learned CIT(A). 12. In the result, ground No.2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No.528/RJT/2024 A.Y.2019-20, and ground No. 2 raised by the assessee, in ITA No. 529-Rjt-24 A.Y. 2020-21, are dismissed. 13. The summarised and concise ground

THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (3),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S SWAPNALOK DEVELOPERS, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 438/RJT/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot22 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri Ranjit Singh, CIR-DRFor Respondent: Shri D.M. Rindani, AR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 40Section 80I

92,64,437/- On verification of partnership deed of the firm dated 02.12.2004, it is noticed that the assessee is a partnership firm consisting of ten partners having equal share @ 10%. As per the contents of the partnership deed simple interest @ 12% per annum was to be paid to the partners on the balance amount to their credit

SHRI PRASHANT JENTILAL RAMANI,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO 3 (1) (3), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, these Tax Appeals are also allowed

ITA 152/RJT/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot20 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 69A

reassessment order passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 and penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the same Assessment Year (A.Y) 2010-11. I.T.A Nos. 152 & 153/Rjt/2023 A.Y. 2010-11 Page No 2 Prashant Jentilal Ramani Vs. ITO 2. The brief facts of the case is that

SHRI PRASHANT JENTILAL RAMANI,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO 3 (1) (3), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, these Tax Appeals are also allowed

ITA 153/RJT/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot20 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 69A

reassessment order passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 and penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the same Assessment Year (A.Y) 2010-11. I.T.A Nos. 152 & 153/Rjt/2023 A.Y. 2010-11 Page No 2 Prashant Jentilal Ramani Vs. ITO 2. The brief facts of the case is that

SHRI BHARATKUMAR IASHWARBHAI BHATIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE ACIT, CENTRAL CIRL-1,, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue, in ITA No

ITA 44/RJT/2023[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Jun 2025AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 134 & 135/Rjt/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: (2007-08 & 2008-09) Income Tax Officer, Ward- Shri Kherajmal Lekhrajbjai 5Th 1(2)(1), Aaykar Bhavan, Thavrani, 4- Parsana Nagar, Shri Vs. Floor, Room No. 517, Race Vaheguru Grupa, Near Refugee Course Ring Road, Rajkot-360 Colony, Rajkot-360 001 001 "थायी लेखा सं./जी आइ आर सं./Pan/Gir No.: Adrpt 5807 E (Appellant) (Respondent)

92,37,997/- The A.O. is directed to consider the income of the above-mentioned cases as determined above. Thus the ground of appeal is partly allowed to this extent.” 9. Aggrieved by the order of Ld. CIT(A) Revenue as well as assessee, filed appeals before us. 10. The Revenue is in appeal because Ld.CIT(A) has restricted upto

SHRI HEMAL MANHARBHAI VAISHNAV,VERAVAL-362266 vs. THE ITO WARD-4,, VERAVAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 201/RJT/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot13 Dec 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year 2012-13. I.T.A No. 201/Rjt/2022 A.Y. 2012-13 Page No 2 Hemal Manharbhai Vaishnav vs. ITO 2. The brief facts of the case is that the assessee is an individual and receiving salary income and interest income

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1 (1), , RAJKOT vs. M/S. DHRUV CRAFT MILL PVT. LTD., VILLAGE: - LILAPAR, TAL. & DIST. MORBI,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are hereby dismissed

ITA 206/RJT/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot03 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 143Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment order passed under section 143 r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Years 2014-15 & 2015-16. Since I.T.A Nos. 206 & 207/Rjt/2022 A.Ys. 2014-15 & 2015-16 Page No 2 DCIT Vs. M/s. Dhruv Craft Mill Pvt. Ltd. identical issue of bogus purchase is involved in both cases

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1 (1), , RAJKOT vs. M/S. DHRUV CRAFT MILL PVT. LTD., VILLAGE: - LILAPAR, TAL. & DIST. MORBI,

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are hereby dismissed

ITA 207/RJT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot03 Nov 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 143Section 143(1)Section 148

reassessment order passed under section 143 r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Years 2014-15 & 2015-16. Since I.T.A Nos. 206 & 207/Rjt/2022 A.Ys. 2014-15 & 2015-16 Page No 2 DCIT Vs. M/s. Dhruv Craft Mill Pvt. Ltd. identical issue of bogus purchase is involved in both cases

THE ITO, WARD-3(1)(1),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. SHRI GIRISHKUMAR M. PURUSWANI,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 405/RJT/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot31 Jan 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment itself is bad in law. The Assessing Officer has overruled the above objection filed by the assessee and satisfied with the explanation of cash deposits to the extent of Rs. 92,51,359/- and not satisfied with the balance cash deposit of Rs. 9,80,77,641/- is added as unexplained cash deposit of the assessee and demanded