BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 482clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi185Mumbai80Chennai44Kolkata23Chandigarh21Bangalore19Jaipur16Indore13Lucknow10Ahmedabad7Guwahati7Jodhpur6Pune4Karnataka2Rajkot2Hyderabad1Orissa1Panaji1Dehradun1Raipur1Rajasthan1Telangana1SC1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 1434Section 1324Section 1422Capital Gains2Undisclosed Income2Limitation/Time-bar2

ASSTT. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CEN. CIR-1,, RAJKOT vs. RAJESHKUMAR GOVINDBHAI PATEL,, RAJKOT

In the result both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross Objections filed by the assessee are hereby dismissed

ITA 25/RJT/2021[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot12 Apr 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 132Section 142Section 143Section 153A

482/- could have been made in absence of any incriminating material found in the course of search. The Ld CIT[A] called for a remand report from the AO and rejoinder from the assessee and after considering various judicial precedents decided the issue in favour of the assessee observing [since detailed analysis is made by the CIT[A] both

ASSTT. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, CEN. CIR-1,, RAJKOT vs. RAJESHKUMAR GOVINDBHAI PATEL,, RAJKOT

In the result both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross Objections filed by the assessee are hereby dismissed

ITA 26/RJT/2021[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot12 Apr 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 132Section 142Section 143Section 153A

482/- could have been made in absence of any incriminating material found in the course of search. The Ld CIT[A] called for a remand report from the AO and rejoinder from the assessee and after considering various judicial precedents decided the issue in favour of the assessee observing [since detailed analysis is made by the CIT[A] both