BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

81 results for “reassessment”+ Section 41(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,674Mumbai1,579Bangalore610Chennai605Jaipur369Kolkata347Ahmedabad327Hyderabad253Chandigarh196Pune176Indore130Surat115Amritsar114Raipur104Cochin82Rajkot81Nagpur65Visakhapatnam63Karnataka57Guwahati52Lucknow49Telangana45Cuttack42Agra37Allahabad37Patna35Jodhpur24Dehradun23SC22Orissa7Calcutta6Kerala5Rajasthan5Ranchi3Jabalpur2Madhya Pradesh1Uttarakhand1Varanasi1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 153A96Section 143(3)50Section 14740Section 14835Addition to Income30Section 271(1)(c)23Section 26321Deduction19Section 13217Section 250

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT vs. CLASSIC NETWORK PVT. LTD., RJAKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 286/RJT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

4. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, in lead case in ITA 288/Rjt/2022 for Assessment Year 2013-14, are as follows: “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in upholding the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in estimating suppressed sales

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 275/RJT/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

4. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, in lead case in ITA 288/Rjt/2022 for Assessment Year 2013-14, are as follows: “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in upholding the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in estimating suppressed sales

Showing 1–20 of 81 · Page 1 of 5

15
Penalty15
Limitation/Time-bar11

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 288/RJT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

4. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, in lead case in ITA 288/Rjt/2022 for Assessment Year 2013-14, are as follows: “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in upholding the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in estimating suppressed sales

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 3/RJT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

4. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, in lead case in ITA 288/Rjt/2022 for Assessment Year 2013-14, are as follows: “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in upholding the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in estimating suppressed sales

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 274/RJT/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

4. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, in lead case in ITA 288/Rjt/2022 for Assessment Year 2013-14, are as follows: “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in upholding the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in estimating suppressed sales

CLASSIC NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,RAJKOT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL - 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 177/RJT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

4. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, in lead case in ITA 288/Rjt/2022 for Assessment Year 2013-14, are as follows: “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in upholding the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in estimating suppressed sales

CLASSIC NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,RAJKOT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL -1 RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 176/RJT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

4. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, in lead case in ITA 288/Rjt/2022 for Assessment Year 2013-14, are as follows: “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in upholding the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in estimating suppressed sales

CLASSIC NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,RAJKOT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL -1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 178/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

4. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, in lead case in ITA 288/Rjt/2022 for Assessment Year 2013-14, are as follows: “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in upholding the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in estimating suppressed sales

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 290/RJT/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

4. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, in lead case in ITA 288/Rjt/2022 for Assessment Year 2013-14, are as follows: “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in upholding the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in estimating suppressed sales

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 291/RJT/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

4. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, in lead case in ITA 288/Rjt/2022 for Assessment Year 2013-14, are as follows: “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in upholding the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in estimating suppressed sales

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 13/RJT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

4. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, in lead case in ITA 288/Rjt/2022 for Assessment Year 2013-14, are as follows: “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in upholding the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in estimating suppressed sales

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 289/RJT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

4. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, in lead case in ITA 288/Rjt/2022 for Assessment Year 2013-14, are as follows: “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in upholding the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in estimating suppressed sales

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 273/RJT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

4. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, in lead case in ITA 288/Rjt/2022 for Assessment Year 2013-14, are as follows: “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in upholding the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in estimating suppressed sales

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. CLASSIC NETWORK PVT. LTD., RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 287/RJT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

4. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee, in lead case in ITA 288/Rjt/2022 for Assessment Year 2013-14, are as follows: “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in upholding the assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 11, Ahmedabad erred in estimating suppressed sales

SHRI LALJIBHAI KHIMJIBHAI PATEL,,BHUJ vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2,, BHUJ

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 388/RJT/2013[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Oct 2019AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Shri Waseem Ahmed Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Written SubmissionsFor Respondent: Shri Jitendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

reassess' to completed assessment proceedings. vi. Insofar as pending assessments are concerned, the jurisdiction to make the original assessment and the assessment under Section 153A merges into one. Only one assessment shall be made separately for each AY on the basis of the findings of the search and any other material existing or brought on the record

SHRI LALJI KHIMJI PATEL,,BHUJ vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRASL CIRCLE-II,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 715/RJT/2010[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Shri Waseem Ahmed Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Written SubmissionsFor Respondent: Shri Jitendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

reassess' to completed assessment proceedings. vi. Insofar as pending assessments are concerned, the jurisdiction to make the original assessment and the assessment under Section 153A merges into one. Only one assessment shall be made separately for each AY on the basis of the findings of the search and any other material existing or brought on the record

SHRI LALJIBHAI KHIMJIBHAI PATEL,,BHUJ vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2,, BHUJ

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 390/RJT/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Oct 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Shri Waseem Ahmed Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Written SubmissionsFor Respondent: Shri Jitendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

reassess' to completed assessment proceedings. vi. Insofar as pending assessments are concerned, the jurisdiction to make the original assessment and the assessment under Section 153A merges into one. Only one assessment shall be made separately for each AY on the basis of the findings of the search and any other material existing or brought on the record

SHRI LALJIBHAI KHIMJIBHAI PATEL,,BHUJ vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2,, BHUJ

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 391/RJT/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Oct 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Shri Waseem Ahmed Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Written SubmissionsFor Respondent: Shri Jitendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

reassess' to completed assessment proceedings. vi. Insofar as pending assessments are concerned, the jurisdiction to make the original assessment and the assessment under Section 153A merges into one. Only one assessment shall be made separately for each AY on the basis of the findings of the search and any other material existing or brought on the record

SHRI LALJI KHIMJI PATEL,,BHUJ vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRASL CIRCLE-II,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 712/RJT/2010[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Oct 2019AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Shri Waseem Ahmed Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Written SubmissionsFor Respondent: Shri Jitendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

reassess' to completed assessment proceedings. vi. Insofar as pending assessments are concerned, the jurisdiction to make the original assessment and the assessment under Section 153A merges into one. Only one assessment shall be made separately for each AY on the basis of the findings of the search and any other material existing or brought on the record

SHRI LALJI KHIMJI PATEL,,BHUJ vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRASL CIRCLE-II,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 714/RJT/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot21 Oct 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble & Shri Waseem Ahmed Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Written SubmissionsFor Respondent: Shri Jitendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

reassess' to completed assessment proceedings. vi. Insofar as pending assessments are concerned, the jurisdiction to make the original assessment and the assessment under Section 153A merges into one. Only one assessment shall be made separately for each AY on the basis of the findings of the search and any other material existing or brought on the record