BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 272A(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai33Ahmedabad22Pune11Cuttack8Delhi8Kolkata7Chennai5Chandigarh4Jaipur4Agra3Hyderabad3Patna3Raipur2Rajkot2Indore2Surat2Nagpur2Bangalore1Dehradun1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 1474Section 69A2Section 1482Limitation/Time-bar2Condonation of Delay2

OM CERAMIC INDUSTRIES,MORBI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD 1, MORBI, MORBI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 494/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Oct 2025AY 2020-21
Section 143(3)Section 271ASection 272ASection 272A(1)(d)Section 5

272A(1)(d)\non 13.02.2023, which was served on 13.02.2023 and appeal before hon. CIT(A),\nwas filed on 23.04.2025, hence there was delay of 770 days.\n3. Your honour may kindly appreciate that Ld. AO has passed order u/s 271AAC(1)\non 13.02.2023, which was served on 13.02.2023 and appeal before hon. CIT(A),\nwas filed on 23.04.2025, hence

SHREE MARU KANSARA SONI GNATI,ANJAR vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD-1 RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 789/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot13 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Sainiआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 789/Rjt/2025 धििाारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: (2017-18) Shree Maru Kansara Soni Gnati बनाम Income Tax Officer (Exemption), /Vs. C/O Rajesh K Soni, Shashtri Road, Ward- 1, Rajkot, Anjar, Kutch-360 001(Gujarat) It Office, New Aayakar Bhavan,Vatiaka, Rajkot-360 001 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aarts 1920 N (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Gopi Nath Chaubey, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 234ASection 250Section 274

272A(1) (d) and 271F of the I.T. Act, 1961. 7. That, the Ld. AO has wrongly charged interest u/s 234A, 234B, 234C,234D of the I.T. Act, 1961. 8. That, the findings of the Ld. AO are not justified and are bad- in- law. 9. The appellant craves to add, amend, alter OR DLEETE any of the above grounds