DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. SHRI MUKESH MANEKCHAND SHETH, RAJKOT

1)(b) were defective and not followed correctly. Specifically, there was a non-application of mind by the Assessing Officer in not quoting the 'assessment year' and other crucial details, rendering the reassessment proceedings invalid.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": ["Section 147", "Section 148", "Section 143(3)", "Section 145

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. SHRI MUKESH MANEKCHAND SHETH, RAJKOT

1)(b) were defective. The Tribunal also noted a non-application of mind by the Assessing Officer in not quoting the 'assessment year' and that the reasons provided were insufficient for reopening the assessment.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "147", "148", "148A", "149", "143(3)", "145(3)", "43CA", "153A", "153C", "151" ], "issues": "The primary issue was whether the reassessment

MUKESH MANEKCHAND SHETH,RAJKOT vs. THE DCIT-ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

sections": ["147", "148", "143(3)", "145(3)", "132", "133A", "131", "148A", "149", "149(1)(b)", "43CA", "153A", "153C", "151"], "issues": "The primary issue was the validity of the reassessment

MUKESH MANEKCHAND SHETH,RAJKOT vs. THE DCIT-ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

1)(b).", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "147", "148", "148A", "149", "153A", "153C", "143(3)", "145(3)", "43CA" ], "issues": "Whether the reassessment

MUKESH MANEKCHAND SHETH,RAJKOT vs. THE DCIT-ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE -2, RAJKOT., RAJKOT

1)(b) of the Act. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings were quashed.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "147", "148", "148A", "149", "143(3)", "132", "133A", "145

MUKESH MANEKCHAND SHETH,RAJKOT vs. THE DCIT-ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE -2, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

1) (b) of the Act, were defective and not\nfollowed by the assessing officer, as per the provisions of the Act, and non-\napplication of mind by the assessing officer in not quoting the 'assessment year'\netc, as set out earlier, and the reasons recorded were not sufficient reasons for\nreopening the assessment proceedings. We, therefore, quash the reassessment\nproceedings

SHRI GIRISHBHAI NANJIBHAI SOLANKI,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (2), RAJKOT

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos. 31 & 32/Rjt/2020 िनधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Years:2011-12, 2012-13 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष"

145 Taxman 12 wherein it was held as under: “Section 148 does not provide any methodology for computing the income on reassessment or assessment. On the contrary, it creates a legal fiction that such return shall be treated as one made under section 139. By the creation of such legal fiction all the procedures prescribed in and subsequent to section

SHRI GIRISHBHAI NANJIBHAI SOLANKI,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (2), RAJKOT

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos. 31 & 32/Rjt/2020 िनधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Years:2011-12, 2012-13 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष"

145 Taxman 12 wherein it was held as under: “Section 148 does not provide any methodology for computing the income on reassessment or assessment. On the contrary, it creates a legal fiction that such return shall be treated as one made under section 139. By the creation of such legal fiction all the procedures prescribed in and subsequent to section

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

145(3) of the Act. 7. That, the Ld. AO has wrongly initiated penalty proceedings u/s 270A, 271A, 271B and 271F of the Act. 8. That, the Ld. AO has wrongly charged interest u/s 234A and 234B of the Act. 9. That, the findings of the Ld. AO are not justified and are bad-in-law. The appellant craves

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

145(3) of the Act. 7. That, the Ld. AO has wrongly initiated penalty proceedings u/s 270A, 271A, 271B and 271F of the Act. 8. That, the Ld. AO has wrongly charged interest u/s 234A and 234B of the Act. 9. That, the findings of the Ld. AO are not justified and are bad-in-law. The appellant craves

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reassessment itself is quashed, all other issues on merits of the additions, and other technical arguments of ld. Counsel for Page 32 of44 ITA No. 286 to 298, 177 & 178/Rjt/2022 & 2024 Classic Network Pvt. Ltd. (Group Case) the assessee, in the impugned assessment proceedings, are rendered academic and infructuous. 50. In the result, the appeal of the assessee

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reassessment itself is quashed, all other issues on merits of the additions, and other technical arguments of ld. Counsel for Page 32 of44 ITA No. 286 to 298, 177 & 178/Rjt/2022 & 2024 Classic Network Pvt. Ltd. (Group Case) the assessee, in the impugned assessment proceedings, are rendered academic and infructuous. 50. In the result, the appeal of the assessee

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reassessment itself is quashed, all other issues on merits of the additions, and other technical arguments of ld. Counsel for Page 32 of44 ITA No. 286 to 298, 177 & 178/Rjt/2022 & 2024 Classic Network Pvt. Ltd. (Group Case) the assessee, in the impugned assessment proceedings, are rendered academic and infructuous. 50. In the result, the appeal of the assessee

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reassessment itself is quashed, all other issues on merits of the additions, and other technical arguments of ld. Counsel for Page 32 of44 ITA No. 286 to 298, 177 & 178/Rjt/2022 & 2024 Classic Network Pvt. Ltd. (Group Case) the assessee, in the impugned assessment proceedings, are rendered academic and infructuous. 50. In the result, the appeal of the assessee

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reassessment itself is quashed, all other issues on merits of the additions, and other technical arguments of ld. Counsel for Page 32 of44 ITA No. 286 to 298, 177 & 178/Rjt/2022 & 2024 Classic Network Pvt. Ltd. (Group Case) the assessee, in the impugned assessment proceedings, are rendered academic and infructuous. 50. In the result, the appeal of the assessee

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reassessment itself is quashed, all other issues on merits of the additions, and other technical arguments of ld. Counsel for Page 32 of44 ITA No. 286 to 298, 177 & 178/Rjt/2022 & 2024 Classic Network Pvt. Ltd. (Group Case) the assessee, in the impugned assessment proceedings, are rendered academic and infructuous. 50. In the result, the appeal of the assessee

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reassessment itself is quashed, all other issues on merits of the additions, and other technical arguments of ld. Counsel for Page 32 of44 ITA No. 286 to 298, 177 & 178/Rjt/2022 & 2024 Classic Network Pvt. Ltd. (Group Case) the assessee, in the impugned assessment proceedings, are rendered academic and infructuous. 50. In the result, the appeal of the assessee

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reassessment itself is quashed, all other issues on merits of the additions, and other technical arguments of ld. Counsel for Page 32 of44 ITA No. 286 to 298, 177 & 178/Rjt/2022 & 2024 Classic Network Pvt. Ltd. (Group Case) the assessee, in the impugned assessment proceedings, are rendered academic and infructuous. 50. In the result, the appeal of the assessee

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reassessment itself is quashed, all other issues on merits of the additions, and other technical arguments of ld. Counsel for Page 32 of44 ITA No. 286 to 298, 177 & 178/Rjt/2022 & 2024 Classic Network Pvt. Ltd. (Group Case) the assessee, in the impugned assessment proceedings, are rendered academic and infructuous. 50. In the result, the appeal of the assessee