BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

121 results for “reassessment”+ Section 139(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,881Mumbai1,318Chennai562Bangalore560Jaipur553Kolkata424Hyderabad312Ahmedabad291Chandigarh197Pune184Indore156Visakhapatnam145Amritsar122Rajkot121Surat112Raipur106Cochin101Patna71Guwahati68Nagpur66Karnataka52Lucknow52Agra42Allahabad39Telangana37Cuttack36Jodhpur33SC19Ranchi18Dehradun18Panaji17Jabalpur9Calcutta5Orissa4Rajasthan4Varanasi4Punjab & Haryana3Kerala2Uttarakhand1Gauhati1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1

Key Topics

Section 147117Section 148112Section 153A94Section 26384Section 143(3)78Addition to Income53Section 142(1)31Reopening of Assessment29Reassessment22

SHRI GIRISHBHAI NANJIBHAI SOLANKI,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (2), RAJKOT

ITA 31/RJT/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot01 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos. 31 & 32/Rjt/2020 िनधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Years:2011-12, 2012-13 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष"

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B. D. Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

139 of the Act comes into play ITA Nos.31,32 & 38to40/Rjt/2020 A.Y. 2010-11 to 2012-13 5 to a return filed under section 148 of the Act. The relevant provisions of section 148 of the Act read as under: [Issue of notice where income has escaped assessment. 148. [(1)] Before making the assessment, reassessment

Showing 1–20 of 121 · Page 1 of 7

Penalty21
Section 25020
Section 143(2)20

SHRI GIRISHBHAI NANJIBHAI SOLANKI,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (2), RAJKOT

ITA 32/RJT/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot01 Mar 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos. 31 & 32/Rjt/2020 िनधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Years:2011-12, 2012-13 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष"

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B. D. Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

139 of the Act comes into play ITA Nos.31,32 & 38to40/Rjt/2020 A.Y. 2010-11 to 2012-13 5 to a return filed under section 148 of the Act. The relevant provisions of section 148 of the Act read as under: [Issue of notice where income has escaped assessment. 148. [(1)] Before making the assessment, reassessment

SHRI MANISH GYANCHAND JAIN ,GANDHIDHAM vs. THEACIT, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE, GANDHIDHAM

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 93/RJT/2020[2016-17]Status: HeardITAT Rajkot08 Jul 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi , A.RFor Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr. D.R
Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 23A

5,83,333.00 under the provisions of section 69 of the Act. The reason of making the addition was based on the proceedings before the ADIT (Inv) as mentioned in the assessment order. The relevant extract is reproduced as under: Unexplained investment u/s.69 of the Act. During the earlier proceedings before ADIT(Inv) the assessee has accepted total profits

MANISH GYANCHAND JAIN,GANDHIDHAM vs. ASSTT. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE, , GANDHIDHAM

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 96/RJT/2018[2010-11]Status: HeardITAT Rajkot08 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi , A.RFor Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr. D.R
Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 23A

5,83,333.00 under the provisions of section 69 of the Act. The reason of making the addition was based on the proceedings before the ADIT (Inv) as mentioned in the assessment order. The relevant extract is reproduced as under: Unexplained investment u/s.69 of the Act. During the earlier proceedings before ADIT(Inv) the assessee has accepted total profits

MANISH GYANCHAND JAIN,GANDHIDHAM vs. ASSTT. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE, , GANDHIDHAM

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 95/RJT/2018[2009-10]Status: HeardITAT Rajkot08 Jul 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi , A.RFor Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr. D.R
Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 23A

5,83,333.00 under the provisions of section 69 of the Act. The reason of making the addition was based on the proceedings before the ADIT (Inv) as mentioned in the assessment order. The relevant extract is reproduced as under: Unexplained investment u/s.69 of the Act. During the earlier proceedings before ADIT(Inv) the assessee has accepted total profits

MANISH GYANCHAND JAIN,GANDHIDHAM vs. ASSTT. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE, , GANDHIDHAM

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 97/RJT/2018[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Rajkot08 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi , A.RFor Respondent: Shri B.D. Gupta, Sr. D.R
Section 131Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 23A

5,83,333.00 under the provisions of section 69 of the Act. The reason of making the addition was based on the proceedings before the ADIT (Inv) as mentioned in the assessment order. The relevant extract is reproduced as under: Unexplained investment u/s.69 of the Act. During the earlier proceedings before ADIT(Inv) the assessee has accepted total profits

SHRI GIRISHBHAI NANJIBHAI SOLANKI,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (2), RAJKOT

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed partly for the statistical purposes

ITA 30/RJT/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot29 Mar 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri B. D. Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 148Section 254Section 69

139 of the Act as a return of income under section 148 of the Act. Thereafter, the AO issued notice under section 143(2) of the Act dated 07-12-2016 and after providing final opportunity to the assessee framed the assessment vide order dated 30-12-2016 wherein certain additions were made to the total income of the assessee

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 288/RJT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

5,93,16,000 97,30,528 4,95,85,472 Total 20,29,63,176 3,02,56,860/- 17,27,06,316/- 5.6 In view of the above decision, it is found that the undersigned had estimate GP of the assessee @ 8% in respect of unrecorded sales/receipt for A.Y.2013-14

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 274/RJT/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

5,93,16,000 97,30,528 4,95,85,472 Total 20,29,63,176 3,02,56,860/- 17,27,06,316/- 5.6 In view of the above decision, it is found that the undersigned had estimate GP of the assessee @ 8% in respect of unrecorded sales/receipt for A.Y.2013-14

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 275/RJT/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

5,93,16,000 97,30,528 4,95,85,472 Total 20,29,63,176 3,02,56,860/- 17,27,06,316/- 5.6 In view of the above decision, it is found that the undersigned had estimate GP of the assessee @ 8% in respect of unrecorded sales/receipt for A.Y.2013-14

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 273/RJT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

5,93,16,000 97,30,528 4,95,85,472 Total 20,29,63,176 3,02,56,860/- 17,27,06,316/- 5.6 In view of the above decision, it is found that the undersigned had estimate GP of the assessee @ 8% in respect of unrecorded sales/receipt for A.Y.2013-14

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT vs. CLASSIC NETWORK PVT. LTD., RJAKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 286/RJT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

5,93,16,000 97,30,528 4,95,85,472 Total 20,29,63,176 3,02,56,860/- 17,27,06,316/- 5.6 In view of the above decision, it is found that the undersigned had estimate GP of the assessee @ 8% in respect of unrecorded sales/receipt for A.Y.2013-14

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 3/RJT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

5,93,16,000 97,30,528 4,95,85,472 Total 20,29,63,176 3,02,56,860/- 17,27,06,316/- 5.6 In view of the above decision, it is found that the undersigned had estimate GP of the assessee @ 8% in respect of unrecorded sales/receipt for A.Y.2013-14

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 289/RJT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

5,93,16,000 97,30,528 4,95,85,472 Total 20,29,63,176 3,02,56,860/- 17,27,06,316/- 5.6 In view of the above decision, it is found that the undersigned had estimate GP of the assessee @ 8% in respect of unrecorded sales/receipt for A.Y.2013-14

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. CLASSIC NETWORK PVT. LTD., RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 287/RJT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

5,93,16,000 97,30,528 4,95,85,472 Total 20,29,63,176 3,02,56,860/- 17,27,06,316/- 5.6 In view of the above decision, it is found that the undersigned had estimate GP of the assessee @ 8% in respect of unrecorded sales/receipt for A.Y.2013-14

CLASSIC NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,RAJKOT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL - 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 177/RJT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

5,93,16,000 97,30,528 4,95,85,472 Total 20,29,63,176 3,02,56,860/- 17,27,06,316/- 5.6 In view of the above decision, it is found that the undersigned had estimate GP of the assessee @ 8% in respect of unrecorded sales/receipt for A.Y.2013-14

CLASSIC NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,RAJKOT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL -1 RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 176/RJT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

5,93,16,000 97,30,528 4,95,85,472 Total 20,29,63,176 3,02,56,860/- 17,27,06,316/- 5.6 In view of the above decision, it is found that the undersigned had estimate GP of the assessee @ 8% in respect of unrecorded sales/receipt for A.Y.2013-14

CLASSIC NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,RAJKOT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL -1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 178/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

5,93,16,000 97,30,528 4,95,85,472 Total 20,29,63,176 3,02,56,860/- 17,27,06,316/- 5.6 In view of the above decision, it is found that the undersigned had estimate GP of the assessee @ 8% in respect of unrecorded sales/receipt for A.Y.2013-14

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 13/RJT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

5,93,16,000 97,30,528 4,95,85,472 Total 20,29,63,176 3,02,56,860/- 17,27,06,316/- 5.6 In view of the above decision, it is found that the undersigned had estimate GP of the assessee @ 8% in respect of unrecorded sales/receipt for A.Y.2013-14

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 290/RJT/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

5,93,16,000 97,30,528 4,95,85,472 Total 20,29,63,176 3,02,56,860/- 17,27,06,316/- 5.6 In view of the above decision, it is found that the undersigned had estimate GP of the assessee @ 8% in respect of unrecorded sales/receipt for A.Y.2013-14