CLASSIC NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,RAJKOT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL - 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

12,16,31,595 97,30,528 Total 29,66,48,738 8,15,62,000 37,82,10,738 3,02,56,860/- 5.15 Therefore, addition made by the assessing officer in the assessment order is directed to be modified as under:- A.Y. Addition made in the assessment order Addition confirmed Relief granted

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

12,16,31,595 97,30,528 Total 29,66,48,738 8,15,62,000 37,82,10,738 3,02,56,860/- 5.15 Therefore, addition made by the assessing officer in the assessment order is directed to be modified as under:- A.Y. Addition made in the assessment order Addition confirmed Relief granted

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. CLASSIC NETWORK PVT. LTD., RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

12,16,31,595 97,30,528 Total 29,66,48,738 8,15,62,000 37,82,10,738 3,02,56,860/- 5.15 Therefore, addition made by the assessing officer in the assessment order is directed to be modified as under:- A.Y. Addition made in the assessment order Addition confirmed Relief granted

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

12,16,31,595 97,30,528 Total 29,66,48,738 8,15,62,000 37,82,10,738 3,02,56,860/- 5.15 Therefore, addition made by the assessing officer in the assessment order is directed to be modified as under:- A.Y. Addition made in the assessment order Addition confirmed Relief granted

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

12,16,31,595 97,30,528 Total 29,66,48,738 8,15,62,000 37,82,10,738 3,02,56,860/- 5.15 Therefore, addition made by the assessing officer in the assessment order is directed to be modified as under:- A.Y. Addition made in the assessment order Addition confirmed Relief granted

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

12,16,31,595 97,30,528 Total 29,66,48,738 8,15,62,000 37,82,10,738 3,02,56,860/- 5.15 Therefore, addition made by the assessing officer in the assessment order is directed to be modified as under:- A.Y. Addition made in the assessment order Addition confirmed Relief granted

CLASSIC NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,RAJKOT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL -1 RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

12,16,31,595 97,30,528 Total 29,66,48,738 8,15,62,000 37,82,10,738 3,02,56,860/- 5.15 Therefore, addition made by the assessing officer in the assessment order is directed to be modified as under:- A.Y. Addition made in the assessment order Addition confirmed Relief granted

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

12,16,31,595 97,30,528 Total 29,66,48,738 8,15,62,000 37,82,10,738 3,02,56,860/- 5.15 Therefore, addition made by the assessing officer in the assessment order is directed to be modified as under:- A.Y. Addition made in the assessment order Addition confirmed Relief granted

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

12,16,31,595 97,30,528 Total 29,66,48,738 8,15,62,000 37,82,10,738 3,02,56,860/- 5.15 Therefore, addition made by the assessing officer in the assessment order is directed to be modified as under:- A.Y. Addition made in the assessment order Addition confirmed Relief granted

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

12,16,31,595 97,30,528 Total 29,66,48,738 8,15,62,000 37,82,10,738 3,02,56,860/- 5.15 Therefore, addition made by the assessing officer in the assessment order is directed to be modified as under:- A.Y. Addition made in the assessment order Addition confirmed Relief granted

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

12,16,31,595 97,30,528 Total 29,66,48,738 8,15,62,000 37,82,10,738 3,02,56,860/- 5.15 Therefore, addition made by the assessing officer in the assessment order is directed to be modified as under:- A.Y. Addition made in the assessment order Addition confirmed Relief granted

CLASSIC NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,RAJKOT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL -1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

12,16,31,595 97,30,528 Total 29,66,48,738 8,15,62,000 37,82,10,738 3,02,56,860/- 5.15 Therefore, addition made by the assessing officer in the assessment order is directed to be modified as under:- A.Y. Addition made in the assessment order Addition confirmed Relief granted

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reassessment under Section 148 within the prescribed time limits. Further, Section 151 requires assessing officers to obtain sanction of the specified authority before issuing notice under Section 148. In Chhugamal Rajpal v. S P Chaliha, a three-Judge Bench of this Court held that Section 151 must be strictly adhered to because it contains "important safeguards." 65 Section 151 imposes

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reassessment under Section 148 within the prescribed time limits. Further, Section 151 requires assessing officers to obtain sanction of the specified authority before issuing notice under Section 148. In Chhugamal Rajpal v. S P Chaliha, a three-Judge Bench of this Court held that Section 151 must be strictly adhered to because it contains "important safeguards." 65 Section 151 imposes

SHRI GIRISHBHAI NANJIBHAI SOLANKI,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (2), RAJKOT

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos. 31 & 32/Rjt/2020 िनधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Years:2011-12, 2012-13 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष"

10. It is settled position of law that the once notice for reopening assessment under section 148 of the Act was issued, the assessee is required to furnish return of income in response to such notice. It is further provided that the return filed under section 148 of the Act is deemed to have filed under section

SHRI GIRISHBHAI NANJIBHAI SOLANKI,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1 (1) (2), RAJKOT

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Ms. Madhumita Royआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos. 31 & 32/Rjt/2020 िनधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Years:2011-12, 2012-13 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष"

10. It is settled position of law that the once notice for reopening assessment under section 148 of the Act was issued, the assessee is required to furnish return of income in response to such notice. It is further provided that the return filed under section 148 of the Act is deemed to have filed under section

MANISH GYANCHAND JAIN,GANDHIDHAM vs. ASSTT. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE, , GANDHIDHAM

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

reassess the income in respect of issues which have escaped assessment, if such issues come to his notice in the course of proceedings under this Section even though the said issues did not find mention in the reasons recorded and the notice issued under section 148 of the Act. 14.3 Now coming to the facts of the case before

MANISH GYANCHAND JAIN,GANDHIDHAM vs. ASSTT. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE, , GANDHIDHAM

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

reassess the income in respect of issues which have escaped assessment, if such issues come to his notice in the course of proceedings under this Section even though the said issues did not find mention in the reasons recorded and the notice issued under section 148 of the Act. 14.3 Now coming to the facts of the case before