BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

218 results for “reassessment”+ Reopening of Assessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,210Delhi2,043Chennai785Ahmedabad639Kolkata502Jaipur415Bangalore333Hyderabad306Pune288Chandigarh260Rajkot218Raipur194Indore170Surat168Visakhapatnam109Patna97Nagpur96Cochin90Cuttack90Amritsar86Guwahati80Agra77Lucknow58Dehradun51Jodhpur43Allahabad34Ranchi34Panaji13Jabalpur8Varanasi6

Key Topics

Section 148113Section 14777Addition to Income56Section 143(3)46Reassessment35Reopening of Assessment31Section 25028Section 142(1)16Section 271(1)(c)15Section 139

THE ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, RAJKOT vs. SHRI VICKY BALKRISHNA MEHTA, RAJKOT

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 130/RJT/2020[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot22 Feb 2023AY 2004-05

Bench: Mrs. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal"नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2004-05 Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. Shri Vicky Balkrishna Mehta, Income-Tax, 7Th Floor, Mansrovar Central Circle-2, Apartment, Royal Park, Rajkot Kalawad Road, Rajkot Pan : Agqpm 6495 B अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri D.M. Rindani, Ar Revenue By : Shri Shramdeep Sinha, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 28.11.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 22.02.2023 आदेश/O R D E R Per Annapurna Gupta: This Appeal Is Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-13, Ahmedabad (Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(A)”) Dated 22.01.2020 Passed U/S 250(6) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961, (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) For Assessment Year (Ay) 2004-05. 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Revenue Read As Under:

For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, CIT-DR
Section 147Section 148Section 149Section 149(1)(c)Section 149(3)

Showing 1–20 of 218 · Page 1 of 11

...
12
Section 143(2)12
Cash Deposit12
Section 250(6)

reopening assessments, which have attained finality on expiry of prescribed period of limitation. Sub-section (2) in putting such embargo refers to whole of sub-section (1) meaning thereby to insulate all assessments, which have become final and may have been found liable to reassessments

KUMAR RAMESH SAHU,RAJKOT, GUJARAT vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(2), RAJKOT, RAJKOT, GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 336/RJT/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Apr 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.336/Rjt/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10) Kumar Ramesh Sahu बनाम/ The Acit, Sundaram, 72/3, New Cirtcle-2(3) Vs. College Wadi Rajkot – 60 001 150Ft5. Ring Road Opp. Meera Apartment Rajkot – 360 005 (Gujarat) "ायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aesps 5531 C (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) .. Assessee By : Shri M.N. Manvar, Ld. Ar Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing 13/01/2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 04/04/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha:

For Appellant: Shri M.N. Manvar, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)Section 54Section 68

reassess income chargeable to tax if he has reason to believe that income for any assessment year has escaped assessment. The word reason in the phrase reason to believe would mean cause or justification. If the AO has cause or justification to know or suppose that income had escaped assessment, it can be said to have reason to believe that

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 290/RJT/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reopening of assessment was made for particular reasons, say, for X, however, ultimate addition was made on different footing, say, for Y, therefore, re-assessment proceedings for assessment year 2015–16 and for assessment year 2016–17 should be quashed. The Ld. Counsel also pointed out that reasons recorded, by the assessing officer, are defective on several counts, hance, reassessment

CLASSIC NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,RAJKOT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL -1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 178/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reopening of assessment was made for particular reasons, say, for X, however, ultimate addition was made on different footing, say, for Y, therefore, re-assessment proceedings for assessment year 2015–16 and for assessment year 2016–17 should be quashed. The Ld. Counsel also pointed out that reasons recorded, by the assessing officer, are defective on several counts, hance, reassessment

CLASSIC NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,RAJKOT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL - 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 177/RJT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reopening of assessment was made for particular reasons, say, for X, however, ultimate addition was made on different footing, say, for Y, therefore, re-assessment proceedings for assessment year 2015–16 and for assessment year 2016–17 should be quashed. The Ld. Counsel also pointed out that reasons recorded, by the assessing officer, are defective on several counts, hance, reassessment

CLASSIC NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED,RAJKOT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL -1 RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 176/RJT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reopening of assessment was made for particular reasons, say, for X, however, ultimate addition was made on different footing, say, for Y, therefore, re-assessment proceedings for assessment year 2015–16 and for assessment year 2016–17 should be quashed. The Ld. Counsel also pointed out that reasons recorded, by the assessing officer, are defective on several counts, hance, reassessment

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT vs. CLASSIC NETWORK PVT. LTD., RJAKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 286/RJT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reopening of assessment was made for particular reasons, say, for X, however, ultimate addition was made on different footing, say, for Y, therefore, re-assessment proceedings for assessment year 2015–16 and for assessment year 2016–17 should be quashed. The Ld. Counsel also pointed out that reasons recorded, by the assessing officer, are defective on several counts, hance, reassessment

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. CLASSIC NETWORK PVT. LTD., RAJKOT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 287/RJT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reopening of assessment was made for particular reasons, say, for X, however, ultimate addition was made on different footing, say, for Y, therefore, re-assessment proceedings for assessment year 2015–16 and for assessment year 2016–17 should be quashed. The Ld. Counsel also pointed out that reasons recorded, by the assessing officer, are defective on several counts, hance, reassessment

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 289/RJT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reopening of assessment was made for particular reasons, say, for X, however, ultimate addition was made on different footing, say, for Y, therefore, re-assessment proceedings for assessment year 2015–16 and for assessment year 2016–17 should be quashed. The Ld. Counsel also pointed out that reasons recorded, by the assessing officer, are defective on several counts, hance, reassessment

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 288/RJT/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reopening of assessment was made for particular reasons, say, for X, however, ultimate addition was made on different footing, say, for Y, therefore, re-assessment proceedings for assessment year 2015–16 and for assessment year 2016–17 should be quashed. The Ld. Counsel also pointed out that reasons recorded, by the assessing officer, are defective on several counts, hance, reassessment

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 275/RJT/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reopening of assessment was made for particular reasons, say, for X, however, ultimate addition was made on different footing, say, for Y, therefore, re-assessment proceedings for assessment year 2015–16 and for assessment year 2016–17 should be quashed. The Ld. Counsel also pointed out that reasons recorded, by the assessing officer, are defective on several counts, hance, reassessment

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 274/RJT/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reopening of assessment was made for particular reasons, say, for X, however, ultimate addition was made on different footing, say, for Y, therefore, re-assessment proceedings for assessment year 2015–16 and for assessment year 2016–17 should be quashed. The Ld. Counsel also pointed out that reasons recorded, by the assessing officer, are defective on several counts, hance, reassessment

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 273/RJT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reopening of assessment was made for particular reasons, say, for X, however, ultimate addition was made on different footing, say, for Y, therefore, re-assessment proceedings for assessment year 2015–16 and for assessment year 2016–17 should be quashed. The Ld. Counsel also pointed out that reasons recorded, by the assessing officer, are defective on several counts, hance, reassessment

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 3/RJT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reopening of assessment was made for particular reasons, say, for X, however, ultimate addition was made on different footing, say, for Y, therefore, re-assessment proceedings for assessment year 2015–16 and for assessment year 2016–17 should be quashed. The Ld. Counsel also pointed out that reasons recorded, by the assessing officer, are defective on several counts, hance, reassessment

M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 291/RJT/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reopening of assessment was made for particular reasons, say, for X, however, ultimate addition was made on different footing, say, for Y, therefore, re-assessment proceedings for assessment year 2015–16 and for assessment year 2016–17 should be quashed. The Ld. Counsel also pointed out that reasons recorded, by the assessing officer, are defective on several counts, hance, reassessment

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. M/S. CLASSIC NETWORK LIMITED,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 13/RJT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot30 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

reopening of assessment was made for particular reasons, say, for X, however, ultimate addition was made on different footing, say, for Y, therefore, re-assessment proceedings for assessment year 2015–16 and for assessment year 2016–17 should be quashed. The Ld. Counsel also pointed out that reasons recorded, by the assessing officer, are defective on several counts, hance, reassessment

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

ITA 612/RJT/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Mar 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(23)(iiia)Section 11Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)(b)

reopening of assessment dated 22/03/2023 has been issued by ITO Ward 5, Gandhidham (Mundra) (referred to as the "Other ITO" hereinafter for short). The copy of notice u/s 148A(b) of the Act is enclosed at page no. 59 Page 8 of 25 ITA No. 611 & 612/RJT/2025 Dff Shri Gandhi Maulana Azas Shramjivi Ashra 2. The order u/s 148A

SHRI GANDHI MAULANA AZAD SHRAMJIVI ASHRA,KUTCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeals of the assessee, are allowed

ITA 611/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot10 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 10Section 10(23)(iiia)Section 11Section 139Section 142(1)Section 145(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)(b)

reopening of assessment dated 22/03/2023 has been issued by ITO Ward 5, Gandhidham (Mundra) (referred to as the "Other ITO" hereinafter for short). The copy of notice u/s 148A(b) of the Act is enclosed at page no. 59 Page 8 of 25 ITA No. 611 & 612/RJT/2025 Dff Shri Gandhi Maulana Azas Shramjivi Ashra 2. The order u/s 148A

THE ITO, WARD-3(1)(1),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. SHRI GIRISHKUMAR M. PURUSWANI,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 407/RJT/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot31 Jan 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reopen an assessment, cannot seek to undertake a fishing or roving inquiry and seek to verify the claims as if it were a scrutiny assessment. " (Unquote) . 5.8 The Ahmedabad IT AT has also taken the same view in case of Sonal Arpit Doshi (decision dated 21.10.2015 in ITA No. 366/Ahd/2015) and quashed the reassessment

THE ITO, WARD-3(1)(1),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. SHRI GIRISHKUMAR M. PURUSWANI,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 405/RJT/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot31 Jan 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reopen an assessment, cannot seek to undertake a fishing or roving inquiry and seek to verify the claims as if it were a scrutiny assessment. " (Unquote) . 5.8 The Ahmedabad IT AT has also taken the same view in case of Sonal Arpit Doshi (decision dated 21.10.2015 in ITA No. 366/Ahd/2015) and quashed the reassessment