Search: penalty u/s 271

1 result for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 80Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi56 Mumbai54 Bangalore27 Ahmedabad17 Jaipur15 Hyderabad13 Lucknow11 Kolkata11 Pune10 Indore6 Jodhpur3 Amritsar3 Ranchi3 Raipur2 Cochin2 Chandigarh1 Rajkot1 SC1

Key Topics

Section 2635 Section 143(3)2

SHRI GIRISHKUMAR VACHHRAJ DHOLAKIA,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for the 12

ITA 157/RJT/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot03 Oct 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Waseem Ahmed

For Appellant: Shri S. N. Soparkar & Samir Jain, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Jitendra Kumar – CIT-D.R

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 263Section 56(2)

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act shall be initiated.” Being aggrieved by the order of ld CIT assessee is in the second appeal before us. 5. The ld AR for the assessee before us filed a paper book which is running from pages 1-242 and submitted that the last hearing was concluded on dated