Search: penalty u/s 271

8 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 282clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi92 Mumbai60 Jaipur43 Bangalore43 Ahmedabad30 Amritsar19 Hyderabad18 Allahabad17 Kolkata17 Pune16 Indore14 Chandigarh13 Rajkot8 Patna5 Surat4 Cochin4 Visakhapatnam3 Dehradun3 Chennai2 Nagpur1 Jodhpur1 Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)17 Section 14816 Section 80P(2)(b)9 Section 142(1)9 Section 1398 Penalty8 Section 80P7 Section 1446 Section 2505

VIJAYABEN RAMBHAI VAJA,RAJKOT vs. ITO, WARD-1(2)(4), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 283/RJT/2022[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Rajkot23 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 139Section 142(1)Section 144Section 148Section 271(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 271F

section 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) and I.T.A Nos. 281 to 284/Rjt/2022 A.Y. 2012-13 Page No 2 Smt. Vijayaben Rambhai Vaja Vs. ITO Penalties levied u/s. 271(1)(c), 271(1)(b) and 271F of the Act relating to the Assessment Year (A.Y) 2012-13. 2.1. The brief fact

VIJAYABEN RAMBHAI VAJA,RAJKOT vs. ITO, WARD-1(2)(4), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

VIJAYABEN RAMBHAI VAJA,RAJKOT vs. ITO, WARD-1(2)(4), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

VIJAYABEN RAMBHAI VAJA,RAJKOT vs. ITO, WARD-1(2)(4), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

VIJAYABEN RAMBHAI VAJA,RAJKOT vs. ITO, WARD-1(2)(4), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

VIJAYABEN RAMBHAI VAJA,RAJKOT vs. ITO, WARD-1(2)(4), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SHRI BHAKTINAGAR CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO 3 (1) (1), RAJKOT

BHAVARSINH ANESINH RAJPUT,ANJAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, GANDHIDHAM, GANDHIDHAM

SHRI BHAVARSINH ANESINH RAJPUT,VILLAGE MEGHPAR, TAL. ANJAR-KUTCH vs. THE ITO WARD 1, GANDHIDHAM, GANDHIDHAM KUTCHH

SURENDRANAGAR DISTRICT CO OP PRODUCERS UNION LIMITED,SURENDRANAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SURENDRANAGAR CIRCLE