Search: penalty u/s 271

9 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 271Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(b)28 Section 271B17 Section 44A10 Penalty9 Addition to Income7 Section 143(3)4 Section 1443 Section 142(1)3 Section 1473 Section 250

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, all the five appeals filed by the assessee are hereby allowed

ITA 134/RJT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot03 Mar 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 271(1)(b)

u/s. 144 assessment order is deleted by the Ld. CIT(A). Thus, the grievance made out by the assessee is found to be genuine and reasonable. In the above circumstances the levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(b) in our considered opinion is unwarranted. For better understanding Section 271(1)(b) and 273B are extracted below: “271

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, all the five appeals filed by the assessee are hereby allowed

ITA 130/RJT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot03 Mar 2023AY 2016-17

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

SHREENATHJI DEVLOPERS,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-2 (1) (1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

YESHA DHIRAJLAL THAKRAR,RAJKOT vs. THE DCIT, NFAC DELHI, DELHI

SHRI DAYALJI JAMNADAS THACKER,BHUJ-KUTCH vs. THE ITO-WARD-2, BHUJ-KUTCH, BHUJ-KUTCH

HIRABEN RAJUBHAI BOKHIRIYA,PORBANDAR vs. INDIVIDUAL, PORBANDAR

NIKUNJ SOJITRA,JAMNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(7), JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR