Search: penalty u/s 271

8 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 234Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai123 Delhi85 Ahmedabad43 Hyderabad26 Raipur19 Surat10 Bangalore10 Jaipur8 Rajkot8 Kolkata4 Indore4 Dehradun3 Chandigarh2 Nagpur2 Jodhpur2 Jabalpur1 Patna1 Agra1

Key Topics

Section 80I10 Section 1478 Section 2507 Penalty7 Addition to Income7 Section 1486 Section 143(3)6 Section 234A6 Section 271(1)(c)5

MAHENDRAKUMAR BHANJIBHAI CHHANIYARA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO WARD 1 (2) (1) RAJKOT, RAJKOT

ITA 280/RJT/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Aug 2025AY 2016-17

Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 210Section 250Section 271(1)(b)Section 271F

271(1)(b) of the IT Act 1961\nrequires to be dropped.\n10. That the appellant is an individual and not having any taxable Income and\nas such not required to file Income Tax return u/s 139 of the Income Tax Act\n1961 Therefore, the penalty initiated u/s 271F of the Income Tax Act 1961 is\nrequire to be dropped

MAHENDRAKUMAR BHANJIBHAI CHHANIYARA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO WARD 1 (2) (1) RAJKOT, RAJKOT

P THREE CONSTRUCTION CO.,NAKHATRANA vs. ITO, WARD-2, BHUJ, BHUJ

MAHENDRAKUMAR BHANJIBHAI CHHANIYARA,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO WARD 1 (2) (1) RAJKOT, RAJKOT

P THREE CONSTRUCTION CO.,NAKHATRANA vs. ITO, WARD-2, BHUJ, BHUJ

URVASHI GIRISHBHAI LAL,RAJKOT vs. ITO WD 1(2)(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

BHAVESH ISHWARLAL PANCHASARA,RAJKOT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJKOT

SHRI SUBHAS HANSARAJ NANDU,BHACHAU-KUTCH vs. THE ACIT, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE, GANDHIDHAM-KUTCH

SHRI MANOJ DHANJIBHAI PANSURIYA,RAJKOT vs. THE NFAC, DELHI, DELHI

SHRI DHARMESH BHAILAL VAGHELA,RAJKOT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER-WARD-3 (1)(2),, RAJKOT

M/S MKC INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,,ANJAR vs. THE ASSTT. COMMR. INCOME TAX, CIRCLE,, GANDHIDHAM