BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 226(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi286Karnataka136Mumbai135Chennai122Jaipur78Ahmedabad60Bangalore39Raipur32Kolkata29Hyderabad22Lucknow19Indore15Chandigarh15Pune15Cuttack13Cochin12Dehradun8Surat5Guwahati5Rajkot5Patna4Allahabad4Panaji4Visakhapatnam3Kerala3SC2Rajasthan2Telangana1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 686Section 143(3)4Addition to Income4Section 271(1)(c)3Section 133(6)2Section 2502Unexplained Money2Cash Deposit2Demonetization

THE ACIT, CIRCLE- 1,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. SMT. MANISHABEN N. MASHRU,, RAJKOT-GUJARAT

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 355/RJT/2011[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Jan 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Shri Rajpal Yadavsr.No.

For Appellant: Shri M.J. Ranpura, CAFor Respondent: Shri Hargovind Singh, CIT-DR
Section 131Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2005-06. Since in all these appeals/cross- objections, issues and facts are intertwined to each other, we proceed to dispose of all by this common order for the sake of brevity and convenience. 3. Before adverting

2
Double Taxation/DTAA2
Natural Justice2
Disallowance2

ACIT CIRCLE-1(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. GRENIC TILES PVT LTD, MORBI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas\nappeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 682/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri R. K. Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld.Sr.DR
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

penalty\nproceedings are also unwarranted and deserve to be quashed.\n10. Without prejudice to the above your assessee craves leave to add, amend,\nalter, vary or withdraw all or any grounds of appeal on or before the hearing of\nappeal.\"\n4. First, we shall adjudicate revenue's appeal in ITA No. 682/Rjt/2025. The\nfacts necessary for disposal of the revenue

GRENIC TILES PRIVATE LIMITED,WANKANER-MORBI vs. ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE 1(1) RKT, RAJKOT

The appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas\nappeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 624/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot11 Mar 2026AY 2017-18
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

penalty\nproceedings are also unwarranted and deserve to be quashed.\n10. Without prejudice to the above your assessee craves leave to add, amend,\nalter, vary or withdraw all or any grounds of appeal on or before the hearing of\nappeal.\"\n4. First, we shall adjudicate revenue's appeal in ITA No. 682/Rjt/2025. The\nfacts necessary for disposal of the revenue

THE ASSTT. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE,, GANDHIDHAM vs. M/S SWAMINARAYAN VIJAY CARRY TRADE PVT. LTD.,, BHUJ

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 333/RJT/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot26 Jun 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed&Smt. Madhumita Royआयकरअपीलसं.Ita Nos.333&399/Rjt/2016 "नधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year: 2011-12 Acit Vs. M/S. Swaminarayan Gandhidham Circle, Vijay Carry Trade (P) Gandhidham-Kutch Ltd. Svtc House, Bhuj- Mirzapar Highway, Bhuj- Kutch-370001 Pan:Aad Cs0 141 C अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "त् यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Smt. Namita Khura, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Vimal Desai, AR
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961and against the order dated 30.08.2016 passed by the CIT(A)-3, Rajkot under sec. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) arising out of the order dated 22.09.2014 passed by the Ld. JCIT, Gandhidham respectively, both for Financial Year 2011-12. 2. Since

THE ASSTT. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, GANDHIDHAM CIRCLE,, GANDHIDHAM vs. M/S SWAMINARAYAN VIJAY CARRY TRADE PVT. LTD.,, BHUJ

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 399/RJT/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot26 Jun 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed&Smt. Madhumita Royआयकरअपीलसं.Ita Nos.333&399/Rjt/2016 "नधा"रणवष"/Asstt. Year: 2011-12 Acit Vs. M/S. Swaminarayan Gandhidham Circle, Vijay Carry Trade (P) Gandhidham-Kutch Ltd. Svtc House, Bhuj- Mirzapar Highway, Bhuj- Kutch-370001 Pan:Aad Cs0 141 C अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "त् यथ"/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Smt. Namita Khura, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Vimal Desai, AR
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961and against the order dated 30.08.2016 passed by the CIT(A)-3, Rajkot under sec. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) arising out of the order dated 22.09.2014 passed by the Ld. JCIT, Gandhidham respectively, both for Financial Year 2011-12. 2. Since