BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1 result for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 168clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi275Mumbai194Karnataka100Ahmedabad53Jaipur52Bangalore46Indore35Calcutta34Raipur31Pune24Chandigarh19Chennai15Cochin12Lucknow11Kolkata10Hyderabad9Visakhapatnam8Dehradun8Surat8Nagpur7Guwahati5Allahabad4Ranchi2Agra2Amritsar2Jodhpur1Rajasthan1Rajkot1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 271B6Section 44A5

NIKUNJ SOJITRA,JAMNAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(7), JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 859/RJT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot08 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.859/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Hybrid Hearing) Nikunj Sojitra Vs. Income-Tax Officer, Dhudashiya, Jamvanthali, Ito Ward – 2(7), Jamnagar - 361130 Jamnagar - 361008 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Gdeps4923M (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Chetan Agarwal, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri K. L. Solanki, Ld. Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 24 / 04 /2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 08 / 07 /2025

For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agarwal, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri K. L. Solanki, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 144Section 271Section 271BSection 44A

271 B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Nikunj Sojitra vs. The ITO ward-2 2. GROUNDS OF APPEAL: - 1. Learned CIT(A) erred in law as well as on facts in upholding the penalty of Rs. 1,50,000/- u/s 271B of the without considering the fact that books of account are not maintained as per section 44AA