Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 144aclear

Sorted by relevance

Allahabad37 Mumbai24 Delhi23 Indore13 Chennai10 Bangalore9 Lucknow8 Hyderabad5 Surat4 Ahmedabad4 Jaipur3 Kerala3 Pune3 Amritsar2 Chandigarh2 Kolkata2 Rajkot2 Agra1 Raipur1 Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 5712 Section 1448 Section 44A4 Section 271(1)(c)2 Section 143(2)2 Section 142(1)2 Deduction2 Penalty2 Disallowance2 Comparables/TP2

KANTILAL BABULAL SOLANKI,,JUNAGADH vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, JUNAGADH

In the result, the quantum appeal in ITA No

ITA 115/RJT/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot27 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 44ASection 57

Penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year (A.Y) 2011-12. I.T.A No. 124/Rjt/2016 & 115/A/2019 A.Y. 2011-12 Page No 2 Kantilal Babulal Solanki Vs. ITO 2. Brief facts of the case is that the assessee is an individual. For the Asst. Year

KANTILAL BABULAL SOLANKI,,JUNAGADH vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2),, JUNAGADH

In the result, the quantum appeal in ITA No

ITA 124/RJT/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot27 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)Section 44ASection 57