Search: penalty u/s 271

1 result for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 142Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi7 Chennai7 Chandigarh7 Pune6 Patna4 Lucknow3 Indore3 Bangalore2 Jaipur2 Mumbai2 Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)5 Section 50C2 Section 1472

KALINDI JAYENDRA RANPARA RAJKOT,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO WARD-2(1)(2), RAJKOT

ITA 125/RJT/2024[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot28 Mar 2025AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपीलसं./Ita No.125/Rjt/2024 Assessment Year: (2006-07) (Hybrid Hearing) Kalindi Jayendra Ranpara. Vs. The Ito Ward-2(1)(2), Rajkot. Shrungar Jewellers, Soni Bazar Main Road, Rajkot-360001. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Abgpr6315Q (Assessee) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri D.M. Rindani, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 234Section 274Section 50C

penalty proceedings u/s.274 rws 271(1)(c) is totally wrong, unwarranted, unjustified and bad in law. 6). Your assessee reserves the right in addition or alteration in the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing. 3. The relevant material facts, as culled out from the material on record, are as follows. The case of the assessee was reopened u/s