SMT. ILLABEN JAYANTKUMAR DOSHI,,RAJKOT-GUJARAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2),, RAJKOT-GUJARAT
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed
ITA 124/RJT/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot04 Feb 2019AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Pradipkumar Kediaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.124/Rjt/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri R.D. Lal Chandani, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jitendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 36
158/-and as unsecured loans of Rs. 5,73,24,900/-. It is also noticed that you have allowed loans and advances totaling to Rs.2,91,73,941/-. However, you had charged interest of Rs.5,35,493/- only from Parul J Doshi, whom loan of Rs.55,23,730/- was given. No interest had been charged from remaining loans and advances