BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 144Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai151Delhi125Chennai57Ahmedabad37Jaipur30Pune29Visakhapatnam28Bangalore27Hyderabad25Chandigarh24Kolkata17Agra14Raipur12Lucknow11Indore9Cochin5Allahabad4Nagpur4Surat4Rajkot3Amritsar2Patna2Guwahati1SC1Dehradun1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 2636Section 143(3)5Section 142(1)3Section 1472Section 148A2Addition to Income2

JITENDRASINH ZALA,JAMNAGAR vs. THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMNAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee, is allowed

ITA 871/RJT/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot18 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Chetan Agarwal, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 263

house property during the year under consideration. Hence, only assessee claimed interest on self-occupied property and not shown any deemed rent income. 7. Regarding room rent expenses of Rs. 23,74,186/-, site expenses of Rs. 28,93,270/-, and salary overtime expenses, the assessee submitted as follows before the learned PCIT: (a)Regarding Room Rent Expenses: the assessee

MINABEN SUDHIRBHAI SOMPURA,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ITO WARD-1 , SURENDRANAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 55/RJT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot09 Mar 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinha

For Appellant: Shri Hem Chhajad, Ld. A.R
Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 69

144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”). 2. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as follows: “1.The order passed by the Ld. CIT (A) is against law, equity & justice. 2. The Ld. CIT (A) has erred in law and on facts in considering the validity of assessment order as there is violation

ACIT, CIRCLE-1(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT vs. GANDHI REALITY (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 110/RJT/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot25 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm

For Appellant: Shri R. K. Doshi, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Verma, Ld. CIT. (DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 230

144B of the Act, after issuance of the prior show cause notice and on availing an opportunity to the Assessee. Accordingly, after issuing a fresh notice u/s 142(1) of the Act, dated 06/12/2022, and a show -cause notice dated 14/12/2022, were issued to the assessee, granting opportunity to explain its case and furnish the relevant details/documents. 4. During